![]() |
How the Tube was built, illustrated article
The Standard has an article with very good pictures of what's now the
Circle line being built in the 1860s: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...e-8759404.html |
How the Tube was built, illustrated article
In message
nternet.com, at 14:05:54 on Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Recliner remarked: The Standard has an article with very good pictures of what's now the Circle line being built in the 1860s: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...e-8759404.html And this article caught my eye at the bottom: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...e-bosses-tell- staff--after-plans-to-close-every-ticket-office-are-revealed- 8760381.html -- Roland Perry |
How the Tube was built, illustrated article
On 13/08/2013 20:05, Recliner wrote:
The Standard has an article with very good pictures of what's now the Circle line being built in the 1860s: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...e-8759404.html I presume when the author writes "There is, sadly, no trace of any of the stations that were built on the first Underground line..." that he is referring only to the Baker St to Farringdon section and then only to the station buildings, rather than the platform area. Bayswater, and Gloucester Road station buildings are two that still survive. |
How the Tube was built, illustrated article
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:11:22 +0100, Subterraneo nowhere@com wrote:
On 13/08/2013 20:05, Recliner wrote: The Standard has an article with very good pictures of what's now the Circle line being built in the 1860s: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...e-8759404.html I presume when the author writes "There is, sadly, no trace of any of the stations that were built on the first Underground line..." that he is referring only to the Baker St to Farringdon section and then only to the station buildings, rather than the platform area. Bayswater, and Gloucester Road station buildings are two that still survive. Yes, I think he must have been referring to the surface buildings rather than the platforms, most of which remain in the same place and don't look dramatically difference (apart from often being built over). But, as you say, remnants of some original surface buildings do survive. |
How the Tube was built, illustrated article
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 20:05:54 UTC+1, Recliner wrote:
The Standard has an article with very good pictures of what's now the Circle line being built in the 1860s: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...e-8759404.html |
How the Tube was built, illustrated article
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 20:05:54 UTC+1, Recliner wrote:
The Standard has an article with very good pictures of what's now the Circle line being built in the 1860s: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...e-8759404.html Evidence once again that all 'underground' railways - even cut-and-cover - are now regarded as 'The Tube'? |
How the Tube was built, illustrated article
wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 20:05:54 UTC+1, Recliner wrote: The Standard has an article with very good pictures of what's now the Circle line being built in the 1860s: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...e-8759404.html Evidence once again that all 'underground' railways - even cut-and-cover - are now regarded as 'The Tube'? For sure, LU itself recently celebrated "the Tube's" 150th anniversary. Colloquially it happened many years ago, but it's now official. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk