![]() |
Overground article
|
Overground article
On 29/05/2015 13:18, eastender wrote: In today's Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...tfl-overground I'm in little doubt these transfers will be success stories - the to-be-Crossrail Shenfield route is inevitable, but I'm thinking particularly of the West Anglia metro routes. It might not be quite the 'immediate overnight success story' that the NLL transfer was - I think in significant part the immediate passenger figure jump on the NLL was down to lots of existing users actually starting to pay their fares! But since then the numbers have of course continued to rise considerably. Good luck to TfL Rail, LOROL and MTR Crossrail. |
Overground article
Mizter T wrote:
On 29/05/2015 13:18, eastender wrote: In today's Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...tfl-overground I'm in little doubt these transfers will be success stories - the to-be-Crossrail Shenfield route is inevitable, but I'm thinking particularly of the West Anglia metro routes. It might not be quite the 'immediate overnight success story' that the NLL transfer was - I think in significant part the immediate passenger figure jump on the NLL was down to lots of existing users actually starting to pay their fares! But since then the numbers have of course continued to rise considerably. Good luck to TfL Rail, LOROL and MTR Crossrail. Many of the same factors should apply: much better revenue protection, safer stations encouraging more off-peak travel, cleaner (if not yet newer) trains more inviting, etc. |
Overground article
On 29/05/2015 16:04, Recliner wrote: Mizter T wrote: On 29/05/2015 13:18, eastender wrote: In today's Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...tfl-overground I'm in little doubt these transfers will be success stories - the to-be-Crossrail Shenfield route is inevitable, but I'm thinking particularly of the West Anglia metro routes. It might not be quite the 'immediate overnight success story' that the NLL transfer was - I think in significant part the immediate passenger figure jump on the NLL was down to lots of existing users actually starting to pay their fares! But since then the numbers have of course continued to rise considerably. Good luck to TfL Rail, LOROL and MTR Crossrail. Many of the same factors should apply: much better revenue protection, safer stations encouraging more off-peak travel, cleaner (if not yet newer) trains more inviting, etc. Agreed. My feeling is that it might take a bit longer for (real) patronage to grow (thinking more of the WA routes here). Despite - rather than because of - Silverlink and their minimal efforts (arguably in large part structural), the NLL - and the WLL - were increasingly popular routes before the LO takeover. People were using it despite the wholly decrepit nature of it all. |
Overground article
Mizter T wrote:
It might not be quite the 'immediate overnight success story' that the NLL transfer was - I think in significant part the immediate passenger figure jump on the NLL was down to lots of existing users actually starting to pay their fares! Yes! I have fond memories of the number of people making u-turns with grumpy faces on the rare days tickets were being checked - fond as the chances of a seat were much higher. But since then the numbers have of course continued to rise considerably. Population growth must have helped: 20 to 30 percent growth since 2007 in several East London boroughs. -- Robin reply to address is (meant to be) valid |
Overground article
On 29.05.15 15:59, Mizter T wrote:
On 29/05/2015 13:18, eastender wrote: In today's Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...tfl-overground I'm in little doubt these transfers will be success stories - the to-be-Crossrail Shenfield route is inevitable, but I'm thinking particularly of the West Anglia metro routes. It might not be quite the 'immediate overnight success story' that the NLL transfer was - I think in significant part the immediate passenger figure jump on the NLL was down to lots of existing users actually starting to pay their fares! But since then the numbers have of course continued to rise considerably. Good luck to TfL Rail, LOROL and MTR Crossrail. I hope that they do last a while. The amount of changes in TOCs on the Lea Valley Lines has made me lose track. It reminds me of an episode of the U.S. animated sitcom "The Simpsons," called "Blame it on Lisa." The Simpson family had received an unexpectedly large phone bill, and Marge said that she would go staighten it out at the phone company's office. Find the dialogue below, which I think is quite apt when discussing TOCs on LVL. "We'll just go down to the phone company and straighten it out." Which phone company? There are hundreds of them. "And they all keep changing their names." "I think we're with Comquaaq." "No, I think its Niagular." "No, last week they became Vertiqual." |
Overground article
On 29.05.15 15:59, Mizter T wrote:
On 29/05/2015 13:18, eastender wrote: In today's Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...tfl-overground I'm in little doubt these transfers will be success stories - the to-be-Crossrail Shenfield route is inevitable, but I'm thinking particularly of the West Anglia metro routes. It might not be quite the 'immediate overnight success story' that the NLL transfer was - I think in significant part the immediate passenger figure jump on the NLL was down to lots of existing users actually starting to pay their fares! But since then the numbers have of course continued to rise considerably. Good luck to TfL Rail, LOROL and MTR Crossrail. Will TfL also operate the Stansted Express, BTW, or will Abelia continue to hold that concession? |
Overground article
In article , () wrote:
On 29.05.15 15:59, Mizter T wrote: On 29/05/2015 13:18, eastender wrote: In today's Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...ervices-london -tfl-overground I'm in little doubt these transfers will be success stories - the to-be-Crossrail Shenfield route is inevitable, but I'm thinking particularly of the West Anglia metro routes. It might not be quite the 'immediate overnight success story' that the NLL transfer was - I think in significant part the immediate passenger figure jump on the NLL was down to lots of existing users actually starting to pay their fares! But since then the numbers have of course continued to rise considerably. Good luck to TfL Rail, LOROL and MTR Crossrail. Will TfL also operate the Stansted Express, BTW, or will Abelia continue to hold that concession? Th services that go beyond the Oyster zones will stay with Greater Anglia. That includes the Lea Valley line via Tottenham Hale and a few services via the Southbury loop. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Overground article
|
Overground article
On 30.05.15 0:12, Mizter T wrote:
On 29/05/2015 19:29, wrote: On 29.05.15 15:59, Mizter T wrote: [snip] Good luck to TfL Rail, LOROL and MTR Crossrail. I hope that they do last a while. The amount of changes in TOCs on the Lea Valley Lines has made me lose track. The devolution of responsibility for these routes to TfL is essentially permanent (or at least for the foreseeable future). TfL can change the concessionaire chosen to run the routes though, but the public face of the service wouldn't change (think DLR - was operated by Serco until December 2014, now it's run by Keolis/Amey). The West Anglia metro routes are being rolled into the overall London Overground concession operated by LOROL, which after an extension now lasts until November 2016. They might well win a new contract to continue operating it of course. It almost reminds me of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority in New York City or RATP in Paris. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk