It seems the intellectual powerhouse masquarading as a naive wet 70s throwback
has suggested women only carraiges would be a good idea.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...arriages-a-pos
sibility-under-jeremy-corbyn

Aside from the obvious problems with enforcing it, I'd love to know how this
towering genius suggests this would take place on the walk through trains that
are becoming more and more popular such as LU S Stock and 378s.

--
Spud

On 26/08/2015 09:20, y wrote:
It seems the intellectual powerhouse masquarading as a naive wet 70s throwback
has suggested women only carraiges would be a good idea.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...arriages-a-pos
sibility-under-jeremy-corbyn

Aside from the obvious problems with enforcing it, I'd love to know how this
towering genius suggests this would take place on the walk through trains that
are becoming more and more popular such as LU S Stock and 378s.

--
Spud

He'll probably be suggesting women only trains next to overcome that
problem.

The lunatics are taking over the asylum.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

Cock o' the North writes:

He'll probably be suggesting women only trains next to overcome that
problem.

With a woman driver and guard

On 26/08/2015 09:20, y wrote:
It seems the intellectual powerhouse masquarading as a naive wet 70s throwback
has suggested women only carraiges would be a good idea.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...arriages-a-pos
sibility-under-jeremy-corbyn

Aside from the obvious problems with enforcing it, I'd love to know how this
towering genius suggests this would take place on the walk through trains that
are becoming more and more popular such as LU S Stock and 378s.

--
Spud


It's OK. He is going to reopen all the coal mines as well, so it will be
steam engines and compartment stock again.

;-)

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:20:11 +0000 (UTC), y wrote:

It seems the intellectual powerhouse masquarading as a naive wet 70s throwback
has suggested women only carraiges would be a good idea.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...arriages-a-pos
sibility-under-jeremy-corbyn

Aside from the obvious problems with enforcing it, I'd love to know how this
towering genius suggests this would take place on the walk through trains that
are becoming more and more popular such as LU S Stock and 378s.

He must have been watching the BBC TV programmes on trains in Mumbai.
So next thing will be doors that don't shut with good handles for
hanging on outside the train.

Guy Gorton

On 26/08/15 13:51, Hils wrote:
On 26/08/15 09:20, y wrote:
It seems the intellectual powerhouse masquarading as a naive wet 70s throwback
has suggested women only carraiges would be a good idea.

Wrong again, what JC actually wrote was this: "Some women have raised
with me that a solution to the rise in assault and harassment on public
transport could be to introduce women only carriages. My intention would
be to make public transport safer for everyone from the train platform,
to the bus stop to on the mode of transport itself. However, I would
consult with women and open it up to hear their views on whether
women-only carriages would be welcome."

People who try to throw **** find that they end up a good deal dirtier
than their targets.

A more useful idea would be sober only carriages, perhaps some boffins
can invent a breathalyser activated door.


IIRC Tonbridge or Tunbridge Wells (or both) station still has a
ladies-only waiting room. I will have a look later...

On 8/26/2015 9:22 AM, Tim Watts wrote:
On 26/08/15 13:51, Hils wrote:
On 26/08/15 09:20, y wrote:
It seems the intellectual powerhouse masquarading as a naive wet 70s
throwback
has suggested women only carraiges would be a good idea.

Hmm - let's extend.

Women only carriages
Women shall be alcohol free
Women shall have an associated male in an adjacent carriage to escort
and arrange taxi at destination
Women shall be modestly dressed

Great idea - Sharia creeps in on little stealthy paws ...

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:51:56 +0100
Hils wrote:
On 26/08/15 09:20, y wrote:
It seems the intellectual powerhouse masquarading as a naive wet 70s
throwback
has suggested women only carraiges would be a good idea.

Wrong again, what JC actually wrote was this: "Some women have raised
with me that a solution to the rise in assault and harassment on public
transport could be to introduce women only carriages. My intention would
be to make public transport safer for everyone from the train platform,
to the bus stop to on the mode of transport itself. However, I would
consult with women and open it up to hear their views on whether
women-only carriages would be welcome."

People who try to throw **** find that they end up a good deal dirtier
than their targets.

When you see someone like that, let us know.

In the meantime, the fact he even considers it and thinks implementing it is
simply down to whether a tiny minority of women want it or not shows the man
is clueless.

--
Spud

On 26/08/2015 15:44, Glazebrook East wrote:

From the article to which you referred:

"Last year, Claire Perry, a Conservative junior transport minister
said the idea of women only carriages was interesting"

As in "That's an interesting idea"? I suspect politicians of all kinds
say that to people with Good Ideas on a regular basis.

--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

On 26.08.15 9:20, y wrote:
It seems the intellectual powerhouse masquarading as a naive wet 70s throwback
has suggested women only carraiges would be a good idea.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...arriages-a-pos
sibility-under-jeremy-corbyn

Aside from the obvious problems with enforcing it, I'd love to know how this
towering genius suggests this would take place on the walk through trains that
are becoming more and more popular such as LU S Stock and 378s.

--
Spud

Trying to appeal to radical feminists?