Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015\11\29 14:51, Recliner wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:56:21 +0000, Basil Jet wrote: On 2015\11\29 11:09, wrote: Are there any other abandoned routes in the London and immediate surrounds that could be considered in the same light? Demolition of buildings will be required on such routes but would for example rebuilding the Hammersmith Grove Road link facilitate route opportunities from the nearer parts of SW London to N London should CrossRail generate so much traffic from further out that becomes overcrowded. I expect the nearby Hammersmith and Chiswick is a lost cause though. I can't think of any use for it even if the track was still there. For decades I've been trying, on and off, to think of a solution to the Gunnersbury Shuffle[1] that wouldn't both cost a fortune *and* make things worse. I may have hit on it. When the Picc takes over Ealing Broadway, divert the District Line trains from Richmond through the old diveunder east of Fishers Lane, which is long enough for two Piccadilly tracks over it. This would give two straight adjacent District tracks east of Acton Lane which could have two platforms built on them. The existing District platforms would be served by the Piccadilly Line, and all Piccadilly services at Turnham Green would cease. The curve on the north side of the Gunnersbury Triangle would be reinstated, and the North London Line would be diverted via the *NEW* District platforms in both directions, with a reversal there. Thus all trains in the area would call at Chiswick Park. The west side of the Gunnersbury Triangle could be abandoned and become part of the nature reserve, to make up for any land lost on the north side. If having NLL trains occupying District platforms while the driver changes ends is a problem, then there would have to be NLL platforms alongside the new District ones, for which there is room, but the extra junctions east of Acton Lane would push all of the new platforms further away from the station entrance. [1] North London Line - Gunnersbury - Turnham Green - Acton Town - Heathrow What about the new blocks of flats on Bollo Lane which are probably in the way of the line and platforms you want to build? The platforms would be east of Acton Lane. I wasn't sure if those flats were on the old alignment. A slightly tighter curve just south of them should be okay... it would be nowhere near as curved as Metropolitan Junction. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:14:52 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote: On 2015\11\29 14:51, Recliner wrote: On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:56:21 +0000, Basil Jet wrote: On 2015\11\29 11:09, wrote: Are there any other abandoned routes in the London and immediate surrounds that could be considered in the same light? Demolition of buildings will be required on such routes but would for example rebuilding the Hammersmith Grove Road link facilitate route opportunities from the nearer parts of SW London to N London should CrossRail generate so much traffic from further out that becomes overcrowded. I expect the nearby Hammersmith and Chiswick is a lost cause though. I can't think of any use for it even if the track was still there. For decades I've been trying, on and off, to think of a solution to the Gunnersbury Shuffle[1] that wouldn't both cost a fortune *and* make things worse. I may have hit on it. When the Picc takes over Ealing Broadway, divert the District Line trains from Richmond through the old diveunder east of Fishers Lane, which is long enough for two Piccadilly tracks over it. This would give two straight adjacent District tracks east of Acton Lane which could have two platforms built on them. The existing District platforms would be served by the Piccadilly Line, and all Piccadilly services at Turnham Green would cease. The curve on the north side of the Gunnersbury Triangle would be reinstated, and the North London Line would be diverted via the *NEW* District platforms in both directions, with a reversal there. Thus all trains in the area would call at Chiswick Park. The west side of the Gunnersbury Triangle could be abandoned and become part of the nature reserve, to make up for any land lost on the north side. If having NLL trains occupying District platforms while the driver changes ends is a problem, then there would have to be NLL platforms alongside the new District ones, for which there is room, but the extra junctions east of Acton Lane would push all of the new platforms further away from the station entrance. [1] North London Line - Gunnersbury - Turnham Green - Acton Town - Heathrow What about the new blocks of flats on Bollo Lane which are probably in the way of the line and platforms you want to build? The platforms would be east of Acton Lane. I wasn't sure if those flats were on the old alignment. A slightly tighter curve just south of them should be okay... it would be nowhere near as curved as Metropolitan Junction. But where would the Overground tracks go? |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015\11\30 11:39, Recliner wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:14:52 +0000, Basil Jet wrote: On 2015\11\29 14:51, Recliner wrote: On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:56:21 +0000, Basil Jet wrote: On 2015\11\29 11:09, wrote: Are there any other abandoned routes in the London and immediate surrounds that could be considered in the same light? Demolition of buildings will be required on such routes but would for example rebuilding the Hammersmith Grove Road link facilitate route opportunities from the nearer parts of SW London to N London should CrossRail generate so much traffic from further out that becomes overcrowded. I expect the nearby Hammersmith and Chiswick is a lost cause though. I can't think of any use for it even if the track was still there. For decades I've been trying, on and off, to think of a solution to the Gunnersbury Shuffle[1] that wouldn't both cost a fortune *and* make things worse. I may have hit on it. When the Picc takes over Ealing Broadway, divert the District Line trains from Richmond through the old diveunder east of Fishers Lane, which is long enough for two Piccadilly tracks over it. This would give two straight adjacent District tracks east of Acton Lane which could have two platforms built on them. The existing District platforms would be served by the Piccadilly Line, and all Piccadilly services at Turnham Green would cease. The curve on the north side of the Gunnersbury Triangle would be reinstated, and the North London Line would be diverted via the *NEW* District platforms in both directions, with a reversal there. Thus all trains in the area would call at Chiswick Park. The west side of the Gunnersbury Triangle could be abandoned and become part of the nature reserve, to make up for any land lost on the north side. If having NLL trains occupying District platforms while the driver changes ends is a problem, then there would have to be NLL platforms alongside the new District ones, for which there is room, but the extra junctions east of Acton Lane would push all of the new platforms further away from the station entrance. [1] North London Line - Gunnersbury - Turnham Green - Acton Town - Heathrow What about the new blocks of flats on Bollo Lane which are probably in the way of the line and platforms you want to build? The platforms would be east of Acton Lane. I wasn't sure if those flats were on the old alignment. A slightly tighter curve just south of them should be okay... it would be nowhere near as curved as Metropolitan Junction. But where would the Overground tracks go? Just south of the buildings, on the north side of the triangular nature reserve. There might even be only one track, since the northbound and southbound NLL would have to cross paths between South Acton and the reversal at the new Chiswick Park platforms, so it might be okay for them to cross paths via a single track section 200 metres long. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Machete attack on Norbury train | London Transport | |||
Terror attack "highly likely" | London Transport | |||
Drunk passenger attack leads to strike | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
she should attack once, believe weekly, then solve alongside the candle around the shower | London Transport |