Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:53:23 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote: On 2016\01\20 09:42, d wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:39:22 +0100 Robin9 wrote: d;153328 Wrote: Unfortunately Goldsmith is a bit of a non-entity so Khan has a good chance of winning. -- Spud Semantic casuistry time: Mr. Goldsmith isn't a non-entity; he's a non-event sitting on a pile of unearned money. He has established a definite public persona: "committed", wimpish and negative, and he has gained much media attention so he's not - alas - a non-entity. Well , call him what you like but he's not mayoral material (and neither is Khan). You have to wonder if the Tory party want to lose the election by choosing him. Perhaps Cameron can't be arsed with yet another greasy pole climber nipping at his heals like Boris has done so is prepared to let Labour win since the Mayor doesn't have much genuine power anyway. Cameron won't lead the Tories into another GE, Pig-gate put paid to that, so I don't think that's his motive. Cameron announced during the GE campaign that he'd step down before the following GE, as he though that ten years was too long at the top. So it's no secret that he'll go in around 2019, when he'll have done nine years as PM, and Tory leader for 14 years. Nothing to do with the later, unsourced, and almost certainly invented tale in Ashcroft's revenge ("I donated so much money that I expected a big job") book. Pig-gate was nothing to do with Cameron, and just served to damage the reputations of the authors the book, Ashcroft and Isabel Oakeshott. The problem with the mayor's job is that it doesn't really lead anywhere, so most of the heavy hitters don't want it. Boris had to have his arm twisted to stand the first time, and as they were in opposition at the time, he liked the idea of being the most important elected Tory in the country. Now they're in power, you wouldn't find any senior London Tory ministers wanting to stand for the job. Also, London voters seem to prefer maverick mayors anyway, which might help Zac once his campaign actually gets underway (he's certainly had a slow start). I suppose there might be the implied promise that he will be able to get more investment from the government than a Labour mayor would, which is more than likely true. London also seems to elect mayors with a slightly racy side to them, and Zac fits that bill better than boring family man Sadiq: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...0m-payout.html |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:39:34 +0000
Recliner wrote: London also seems to elect mayors with a slightly racy side to them, and Zac fits that bill better than boring family man Sadiq: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oldsmith-admit -adultery-wife-divorces-days-Election--faces-100m-payout.html Looking the the drop dead gorgeous wife and then the Ms Plain Jane mistress you have to question the mans judgement somewhat. Or eyesight at least! -- Spud |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016\01\20 13:57, d wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:39:34 +0000 Recliner wrote: London also seems to elect mayors with a slightly racy side to them, and Zac fits that bill better than boring family man Sadiq: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oldsmith-admit -adultery-wife-divorces-days-Election--faces-100m-payout.html Looking the the drop dead gorgeous wife and then the Ms Plain Jane mistress you have to question the mans judgement somewhat. Or eyesight at least! That's not very nice... hang on, she did cheat with a married man, so I suppose we don't have to be nice to her... err.. let me see... oh yeah. clears throat "I always wondered what the clown balloon from the testcard was doing these days" |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-01-20, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 22:10:25 on Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Eric remarked: [Train drivers] overpaid is a matter of opinion. And anyone who has that opinion should spend a few full shifts in the cab. You could also say that about nurses in A&E and constables on the beat. Both of whom earn about half that of a train driver. Of course you could. OK then, overpaid and underpaid are both a matter of opinion, and in many cases that opinion could be modified by spending significant time observing the job concerned. Eric -- ms fnd in a lbry |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 16:46:56 on Wed, 20
Jan 2016, Eric remarked: [Train drivers] overpaid is a matter of opinion. And anyone who has that opinion should spend a few full shifts in the cab. You could also say that about nurses in A&E and constables on the beat. Both of whom earn about half that of a train driver. Of course you could. OK then, overpaid and underpaid are both a matter of opinion, and in many cases that opinion could be modified by spending significant time observing the job concerned. I also observe the existence of closed shops, and the effect that has on wages. -- Roland Perry |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric wrote:
On 2016-01-20, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 22:10:25 on Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Eric remarked: [Train drivers] overpaid is a matter of opinion. And anyone who has that opinion should spend a few full shifts in the cab. You could also say that about nurses in A&E and constables on the beat. Both of whom earn about half that of a train driver. Of course you could. OK then, overpaid and underpaid are both a matter of opinion, and in many cases that opinion could be modified by spending significant time observing the job concerned. Even better, open up recruitment to anyone who wants to apply, not just existing staff. That way the market can decide whether the job is over or underpaid, so we won't need to rely on opinion. How many weeks training are needed to become an LU driver? |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:46:56 +0100
Eric wrote: On 2016-01-20, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 22:10:25 on Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Eric remarked: [Train drivers] overpaid is a matter of opinion. And anyone who has that opinion should spend a few full shifts in the cab. You could also say that about nurses in A&E and constables on the beat. Both of whom earn about half that of a train driver. Of course you could. OK then, overpaid and underpaid are both a matter of opinion, and in many cases that opinion could be modified by spending significant time observing the job concerned. So other than getting up for early shifts occasionally (which many other jobs require), fill us in on what is so taxing about the job of a tube driver that justifies them being paid twice as much as a nurse or a bus driver or a police constable. Obviously theres some incredibly intellectually or physically demanding part of the job that we're just not aware of so please tell us what it is. -- Spud |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 11:18:34 on Wed, 20 Jan 2016, d remarked: try working as a junior doctor for 70 hours a week making life and death decisions on possibly an hourly basis Not to mention the nine years training, and having to be "AAA" at A-level material. I don't think that's a "have to", it's just a convenient filter. IME there's no equivalent academic expectation in many other countries for "entry level" doctors. tim |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL £5Bn short for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
Alternative/short-term solution for Thameslink at London Bridge | London Transport | |||
Jan 2 - usual cock-up on FGWL | London Transport | |||
Tube only short distance season tickets | London Transport | |||
"Short Journey - Ask Driver" | London Transport |