Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Coffee wrote:
My address is also not in the post code data base which can cause problems. In my case my land line had to be installed in an "outbuilding" at my postcode! When I've found addresses missing from the PAF, Royal Mail have generally fixed it pretty quickly. Though in one case I had to go to the council as the building really didn't have an address (despite existing, and receiving post, for over 20 years). It still got sorted in a couple of weeks, and we got an official letter telling us our "new" address. Of course it then takes months or years for everyone else to update their copies of that database! Mike |
#92
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22/01/2016 10:20, Roland Perry wrote:
ps We do still have some counties in our addresses; places in Peterborough for example, which is a County. Although in any event Peterborough is a "Post Town". Ooh, it's been a while since we last had a good old uk.railway "geopolitics of Peterborough" thread. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#93
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#94
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:26:59 +0000, Basil Jet
wrote: On 2016\01\22 12:30, aurora wrote: Then in 1965 came the ultimate land grab. Newly created Greater London stretched from Chessington to Enfield. Middlesex ceased to exist as a county authority. Most of remaining Middlesex became Greater London, with small enclaves transferring to Surrey. Or Herts. Incidentally, the county boundary between Potters Bar and Barnet used to have Hertfordshire on the south side and now the same county boundary has Hertfordshire on the north side. Could this be a unique occurrence in the world? I wonder if the "Welcome to Hertfordshire" signs were just turned around on the same pole. "Informative" signs on highways are not always precisely located unlike older official boundary markers. Many of the former are positioned in a manner that implies some kind of no-mans-land in between while a few others can overlap. |
#95
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:02:31 +0000, Martin Coffee
wrote: On 22/01/16 10:57, Optimist wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:20:07 +0000, Roland Perry wrote: In message -sept I wonder if we could thwart them by typing "England" as the county and "European Union" as the country? ps We do still have some counties in our addresses; places in Peterborough for example, which is a County. Although in any event Peterborough is a "Post Town". The post town should be abolished, as we have the post code. It often misleads strangers who not unreasonably follow signposts to it but can find themselves miles away from their intended destination. The post town is useful for the Postie if the post code is incorrect. As is the county when dealing with a placename which is not unique. |
#96
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:30:05 -0800, aurora wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:14:43 +0000, Roland Perry wrote: In message -sept ember.org, at 08:42:10 on Fri, 22 Jan 2016, Recliner remarked: The Royal Mail dropped county names from addresses years ago. Yes, but too many web forms still make it a mandatory field, probably because they were originally designed to collect US addresses. Not literally so, because US addresses don't include the county. In general they are shorter than UK addresses, only having Street, Town, State (universally abbreviated) and Zipcode. For example, Microsoft is: One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, 98052-7329. No mention at all of King County. One would have expected Nigel to have known that. Is there any postal authority that still uses counties, or their functional equivalent? An Post; Japan Post if you count prefectures as equivalent to counties. As a consequence of ignoring counties it seems if you want to find the postcode to 1 High Street, Sutton in RM's address/postcode finder then you're buggered if you don't have native knowledge of UK geography. |
#97
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#98
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#99
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:52:47 -0800 (PST), "R. Mark Clayton"
wrote: On Friday, 22 January 2016 13:49:39 UTC, e27002 wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:26:11 -0800 (PST), "R. Mark Clayton" wrote: On Friday, 22 January 2016 12:51:22 UTC, e27002 wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 02:09:50 +0000, Basil Jet wrote: SNIP In 1855 the Metropolitan Board of Works was imposed on the urbanized parts of Middlesex, Surrey, and Kent adjacent to the City. This was an unelected, unpopular body that descended into corruption. So, in 1889, without the consent of the governed, half of Middlese,x and parts of neighboring Surrey, and Kent were annexed into the London County Council Area. Really - no members of parliament then - I thought the reform act was in 1832. Do remind me of when the residents of Middlesex were polled in a referendum regarding their future. General elections were held in 1885 and 1886 on a reformed franchise (nor universal, but most adult males). A referendum is only really appropriate for something one cannot practically reverse e.g. Independence of Scotland or joining the EU. If the boundaries do not work then parliament can just as easily revise them as it did with the counties of Avon, Humberside and Cleveland. The London County Council was unique in being granted powers not given to other counties. Why these powers could not have been granted the Middlesex, Surrey, and Kent is a mystery. Because they related to a capital city (and the largest urban centre by a large margin)? IIRC the extra powers related to education and orphanages. These are hardly matters that could not be handled by the existing boroughs, or counties. Really, so why was ILEA set up then? ILEA was incorporated in 1965 at the same time as the GLC. Prior to that the LCC handled education, My post was in chronological order. So, yes, REALLY. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Overground expansion | London Transport | |||
London Overground expansion | London Transport | |||
London Overground Expansion | London Transport | |||
Congestion charging expansion plans: zone expansion. | London Transport |