Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-02-16 17:02:17 +0000, d said:
101 things I haven't even thought of. You can say that again. |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:21:30 +0000
Mizter T wrote: On 15/02/2016 12:06, d wrote: I see the ELL is closed it for 9 days. I had my suspicions that it wasn't being taken seriously as a transport link by TfL given its slow service and poor timetable, and this rather proves it. Can you imagine any tube line being closed for that many consecutive days now unless there had been a major incident? You're such a plonker. I'll take that as a complement, coming from the man who sets the benchmark of it on here. -- Spud |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:21:30 +0000 Mizter T wrote: On 15/02/2016 12:06, d wrote: I see the ELL is closed it for 9 days. I had my suspicions that it wasn't being taken seriously as a transport link by TfL given its slow service and poor timetable, and this rather proves it. Can you imagine any tube line being closed for that many consecutive days now unless there had been a major incident? You're such a plonker. I'll take that as a complement, coming from the man who sets the benchmark of it on here. A complement to what? |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:25:46 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:21:30 +0000 Mizter T wrote: On 15/02/2016 12:06, d wrote: I see the ELL is closed it for 9 days. I had my suspicions that it wasn't being taken seriously as a transport link by TfL given its slow service and poor timetable, and this rather proves it. Can you imagine any tube line being closed for that many consecutive days now unless there had been a major incident? You're such a plonker. I'll take that as a complement, coming from the man who sets the benchmark of it on here. A complement to what? Not had your morning coffee yet? -- Spud |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:25:46 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:21:30 +0000 Mizter T wrote: On 15/02/2016 12:06, d wrote: I see the ELL is closed it for 9 days. I had my suspicions that it wasn't being taken seriously as a transport link by TfL given its slow service and poor timetable, and this rather proves it. Can you imagine any tube line being closed for that many consecutive days now unless there had been a major incident? You're such a plonker. I'll take that as a complement, coming from the man who sets the benchmark of it on here. A complement to what? Not had your morning coffee yet? I realise that English clearly isn't your first, and perhaps not even your second, language, so perhaps you should find a dictionary to discover what complement means. Hint: it's not synonymous with compliment. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:51:48 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:25:46 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:21:30 +0000 Mizter T wrote: On 15/02/2016 12:06, d wrote: I see the ELL is closed it for 9 days. I had my suspicions that it wasn't being taken seriously as a transport link by TfL given its slow service and poor timetable, and this rather proves it. Can you imagine any tube line being closed for that many consecutive days now unless there had been a major incident? You're such a plonker. I'll take that as a complement, coming from the man who sets the benchmark of it on here. A complement to what? Not had your morning coffee yet? I realise that English clearly isn't your first, and perhaps not even your second, language, so perhaps you should find a dictionary to discover what complement means. Hint: it's not synonymous with compliment. Oh clever old you, you spotted a spelling mistake. Pat yourself on the back and be your usual smug self for the day. -- Spud |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:51:48 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:25:46 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:21:30 +0000 Mizter T wrote: On 15/02/2016 12:06, d wrote: I see the ELL is closed it for 9 days. I had my suspicions that it wasn't being taken seriously as a transport link by TfL given its slow service and poor timetable, and this rather proves it. Can you imagine any tube line being closed for that many consecutive days now unless there had been a major incident? You're such a plonker. I'll take that as a complement, coming from the man who sets the benchmark of it on here. A complement to what? Not had your morning coffee yet? I realise that English clearly isn't your first, and perhaps not even your second, language, so perhaps you should find a dictionary to discover what complement means. Hint: it's not synonymous with compliment. Oh clever old you, you spotted a spelling mistake. Pat yourself on the back and be your usual smug self for the day. From your previous answer, it quite obviously wasn't a spelling mistake. You simply didn't know what the word meant. Have you now looked it up in a dictionary, or asked an English-speaker what it means? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A stock after closure of ELL | London Transport | |||
Weekend District/Circle Closure | London Transport | |||
Closure of Liverpool Street this morning | London Transport | |||
Five Day closure of Central Line (was surprised) | London Transport | |||
Success of Central Line Closure answer to Track Maintenance | London Transport |