Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From ITV Teletext
PLANS TO DEVELOP LINE The Strategic Rail Authority plans to develop under-used train lines, including the one in Hertfordshire. The SRA plans to designate the line a '' community railway'' to cut costs and enhance low-frequency low-speed lines without lessening safety and quality. A consultation paper identifies the Watford Junction to St Albans Abbey line as a route for the project. Burkey |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JWBA68" wrote in message ... From ITV Teletext PLANS TO DEVELOP LINE The Strategic Rail Authority plans to develop under-used train lines, including the one in Hertfordshire. The SRA plans to designate the line a '' community railway'' to cut costs and enhance low-frequency low-speed lines without lessening safety and quality. A consultation paper identifies the Watford Junction to St Albans Abbey line as a route for the project. Burkey Only a few years ago there were heavy rumours of a tramway being built from Watford, along the route of the St Albans branch to Hatfield and beyond !! Cheerz, Baz |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Acrosticus wrote:
From: (JWBA68) Date: 26/02/2004 14:27 GMT Standard Time Message-id: The SRA plans to designate the line a '' community railway'' to cut costs and enhance low-frequency low-speed lines without lessening safety and quality. How do you cut costs without lessening safety and quality? This seems to be another case of Bowker's boys talking out of their anuses. Shows how much you know, as usual. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:29:53 -0000, "Marratxi"
wrote: "JWBA68" wrote in message ... From ITV Teletext PLANS TO DEVELOP LINE The Strategic Rail Authority plans to develop under-used train lines, including the one in Hertfordshire. The SRA plans to designate the line a '' community railway'' to cut costs and enhance low-frequency low-speed lines without lessening safety and quality. A consultation paper identifies the Watford Junction to St Albans Abbey line as a route for the project. Burkey Only a few years ago there were heavy rumours of a tramway being built from Watford, along the route of the St Albans branch to Hatfield and beyond !! And then a guided busway was rumoured.... The community railway approach is not what the users want - they would prefer a through service to London" -- Peter Lawrence |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Lawrence" wrote in message ... And then a guided busway was rumoured.... The community railway approach is not what the users want - they would prefer a through service to London" The two are not mutually exclusive. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:11:50 +0000, Cast_Iron wrote:
The two are not mutually exclusive. Indeed. What (other than lack of demand and easy interchange, or "it's always been that way") is the reason why the branch does not have a through service to London, at least in the peaks? Is it stock-related? Can the 321s operate the branch, or only the 313s for some reason (e.g. clearance)? Or is it simply line capacity? Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK Mail me on neil at the above domain; mail to the above address is NOT read |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:11:50 +0000, Cast_Iron wrote: The two are not mutually exclusive. Indeed. What (other than lack of demand and easy interchange, or "it's always been that way") is the reason why the branch does not have a through service to London, at least in the peaks? Is it stock-related? Can the 321s operate the branch, or only the 313s for some reason (e.g. clearance)? Or is it simply line capacity? Neil I was under the impression that it was the need for trains to cross over the whole WCML on the flat to reach the DC lines. (BICBW) -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:41:00 +0000, Dave Arquati wrote:
I was under the impression that it was the need for trains to cross over the whole WCML on the flat to reach the DC lines. (BICBW) I'd heard that...but why the DC lines? It's overhead electrified, is it not? (I think...) Why not run non-stop from Watford Jn to Euston on the AC lines? That said, it'd still have to cross the fasts. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK Mail me on neil at the above domain; mail to the above address is NOT read |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Community Bike Ride!! | London Transport | |||
NEW GROUP - Eco Friendly low carbon executive cars chauffeur services to be designed for and with the Business Community - we seek your views - contact the group or new website today... | London Transport | |||
[ANN] London Commuter's community site | London Transport | |||
Croydon - rail access key to £2 billion investment plans | London Transport | |||
Rail link plans get backing | London Transport |