![]() |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 and Turning South London
"Neil Williams" wrote in message ... On 2016-07-18 11:57:12 +0000, tim... said: at a 3% mark up (YMMV - happy to be told where I, someone with irregular income, can get one that doesn't) Banks in "profitable business" shocker :) At margins of up to 30% - yes I really did see people charging that much on holiday last week Only gullible people pay that. But there are still people who use the dodgy exchanges (the obvious answer is, otherwise they wouldn't be there, but I can further, I actually watched them) The best deal can usually be had by either buying in advance That cannot work for the whole of your spending, it is impossible to estimate accurately how much cash you need and you will always need to top up whilst you are there (or come home with a large under-spend) in any case pre-booking doesn't get you a good rate for "exotic" currencies (which in reality means anything except the top dozen currencies, and lots of currencies not exotic at all) or using your card in a cash dispenser. see my previous comment tim |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2andTurning South London Orange?
"Mark Goodge" wrote in message house.net... On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:01:24 -0000 (UTC), Anna Noyd-Dryver put finger to keyboard and typed: Mark Goodge wrote: On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 20:20:09 -0000 (UTC), bob put finger to keyboard and typed: Mark Goodge wrote: In real life, I think it's likely we will end up as members of EFTA. The benefits are useful, and the downsides of belonging are minimal (membership carries far fewer obligations than EU membership). Whether we then go for EEA membership will depend, I think, on whether or not we can negotiate a suitable set of Swiss-style bilateral treaties with the EU or whether the only way to get what we want is to join the EEA. The difficulty is both EEA and EFTA involve paying money to the EU and accepting free movement of people. An awful lot of people who voted "leave" we're under the impression these were the things they were voting to get rid of, and will be pretty miffed if they are retained. EEA membership requires acceptance of the "four freedoms", including freedom of movement, across the whole of EFTA and the EU. EFTA membership alone doesn't. Switzerland has a bilateral treaty with the EU which includes freedom of movement, but it would be possible not to have it. The Swiss voted to restrict freedom of movement two years ago but haven't yet found a way to implement it. Indeed; they can't do that without renegotiating the treaties which include it, because if they simply impose it then the treaties become invalid. That doesn't mean it's impossible, simply that the other benefits of the treties that would be lost are too important to simply give up on. If we want the same benefits then we, too, would almost certainly need to accept freedom of movement, either via EEA membership or a bilateral treaty. But it's not entirely implausible that the UK, being a considerably larger, richer and more populous country than Switzerland, can either do without if that's what it takes, or negotiate a better deal to begin with. Precisely :-) tim |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 andTurning South London Orange?
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:16:20 +0100, "tim..."
wrote: "Charles Ellson" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:22:57 +0100, "tim..." wrote: "Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message ... I want us to be able to trade with our European neighbours. But I also want us to have absolute control of our borders so we can limit the numbers of non-UK people that we allow in The UK is not in Schengen, so it has control over its borders already. No we don't in Schengen or otherwise, EU rules EEA rules. forbid us from excluding entry for another EU citizen except in very exceptional circumstances. If someone has an EU passport, Valid EEA ID card or passport. they are in, end of. The (usual) reasons for wanting to exclude someone: Failing to produce the above. Actually, failure to produce the relevant ID document is not a "usual" reason for waning to exclude someone. You had better tell the chap/ess who wrote the Border Force's instruction book. Various reasons for refusal are clearly stated and are reasonably expected events of which failure to prooduce suitably ID is a rather basic reason although there is discretion allowed unlike when a person is subject to a current deportation order or has convicted of an offence for the punishment has exceeded specified minimum periods [https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigrat...s-for-refusal] Whilst it is true that border control go to great lengths to ensure that people without documentation don't actually turn up on their doorstep (because it is expensive to deal with), if someone does manage it, then that is not a prima facia reason to exclude them. "Grounds on which entry clearance or leave to enter the United Kingdom should normally be refused (8) failure by a person arriving in the United Kingdom to furnish the Immigration Officer with such information as may be required for the purpose of deciding whether he requires leave to enter and, if so, whether and on what terms leave should be given;" There are a (large) set of individuals who do have a, de facto, right to enter the UK and if you can satisfy border control that you are such a person they will let you in, lack of documentation notwithstanding. tim |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 and Turning South London Orange?
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 18:34:45 +0100, "tim..."
wrote: "David Walters" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:41:26 +0100, tim... wrote: Oh so the company that refurbishes antique mercury-based scientific instruments didn't have to close its operation because the EU banned the sale of these instruments, then? Do you have a source for that? The 2007 press release I've found says antiques are exmpted: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/...070706IPR08897 Is there a more recent ban? No, there isn't the exception applies to items sold in their current state of working-ness (sorry can't find a real word for that) once they go wrong the rules forbid the mechanise from being repaired using historic components, they have to be left not working or repaired with a non-mercury based device. who the hell wants the latter in an antique device? There are plenty of antique items which collectors are happy to possess without using them for their original purpose. Do ****pot collectors usually insist on using their treasures ? Do collectors of Maori warclubs moan because they can't go down the high street and **** the locals with them ? |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 andTurning South London Orange?
tim... wrote:
"David Walters" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:41:26 +0100, tim... wrote: Oh so the company that refurbishes antique mercury-based scientific instruments didn't have to close its operation because the EU banned the sale of these instruments, then? Do you have a source for that? The 2007 press release I've found says antiques are exmpted: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/...070706IPR08897 Is there a more recent ban? No, there isn't the exception applies to items sold in their current state of working-ness (sorry can't find a real word for that) once they go wrong the rules forbid the mechanise from being repaired using historic components, they have to be left not working or repaired with a non-mercury based device. who the hell wants the latter in an antique device? "The ban covers only the sale of new devices. Existing instruments can still be repaired or bought and sold second-hand." [...] "Another Parliament amendment accepted by Council lays down that mercury measuring devices may be traded if they are more than 50 years old, since they are to be classified as antiques or cultural goods. " Anna Noyd-Dryver |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 andTurning South London Orange?
"Charles Ellson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:16:20 +0100, "tim..." wrote: "Charles Ellson" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:22:57 +0100, "tim..." wrote: "Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message ... I want us to be able to trade with our European neighbours. But I also want us to have absolute control of our borders so we can limit the numbers of non-UK people that we allow in The UK is not in Schengen, so it has control over its borders already. No we don't in Schengen or otherwise, EU rules EEA rules. forbid us from excluding entry for another EU citizen except in very exceptional circumstances. If someone has an EU passport, Valid EEA ID card or passport. they are in, end of. The (usual) reasons for wanting to exclude someone: Failing to produce the above. Actually, failure to produce the relevant ID document is not a "usual" reason for waning to exclude someone. You had better tell the chap/ess who wrote the Border Force's instruction book. Various reasons for refusal are clearly stated and are reasonably expected events of which failure to prooduce suitably ID is a rather basic reason although there is discretion allowed Think about how that works in practice you have a person in front of you who has "lost" his ID you refuse him entry and insist that the carrier return him to his point of origin he gets the stands in front of border control tells them that he has lost his ID, they refuse him entry and insist that the carrier return him to his point of origin He gets there, stands in front of border control, tells them he has lost his ID ...... tim |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 and Turning South London Orange?
In message , at 18:30:37 on Mon, 18 Jul
2016, tim... remarked: It's every much the same sort of thing: banning a commodity because it's harmful/unethical or whatever. There is a mile of difference between unethical and harmful, especially when in normal use the item isn't harmful at all, it's only harmful if it's abused. Ivory hunting is harmful to elephants. The reason I mentioned that one example (rather than say a pesticide) is that sufficiently old examples have grandfather rights. Which you might be suggesting doesn't apply to mercury instruments?? The grandfather rights to antique mercury based instruments apply to unrepaired ones (whether still working or otherwise). as soon as they (the mechanism) is newly repaired they have to follow the same rules as newly made, which means that their sale is banned. Cite? If true, I agree; but I've never come across a situation that a repaired grandfathered item is suddenly ungrandfathered. -- Roland Perry |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 and Turning South London Orange?
In message , at 18:29:03 on Mon, 18 Jul
2016, Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked: "Another Parliament amendment accepted by Council lays down that mercury measuring devices may be traded if they are more than 50 years old, since they are to be classified as antiques or cultural goods. " Exactly like ivory then. -- Roland Perry |
Will Brexit lead to the abandonment of Crossrail2 and Turning South London
In article ,
(Neil Williams) wrote: On 2016-07-18 11:32:04 +0000, said: Ah! The old British Imperial arrogance! The EU has plenty of trading opportunities without the UK and can afford to be hard bon us as we can afford to be hard on them, nearly 10 times the size. I voted Remain, but even given that, if they impose *punitive* tariffs they are selfish idiots barely worse than a child throwing toys out of their pram. They won't impose tariffs. They will just refuse to accept British demands if they are as diplomatic as Boris Johnson and David Davis. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk