Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Clank" wrote in message ... tim... wrote: "Someone Somewhere" wrote in message ... On 11/08/2016 09:13, Robin9 wrote: That Uber don't like these new requirements and have prepared a ready-made email for their drivers to send to TfL indicates three things: 1) A lot of Uber drivers don't speak English very well; 2) Taking back in house the testing of private hire drivers and setting even a moderate standard will immediately reduce the number of new entrants; 3) The propaganda put out by the "remain" group that all immigrants working in this country were exceptionally gifted people unmatched by any Briton was nonsense. Why do we want less cabbies (of all types, including black and private hire) anyway? Most other industries are left to set their own level of employees and even where people are self-employed the market is somewhat self-balancing. because by being a self employed person and "earning" minimum wage for the minimum number of hours, entitles you to in work benefits. That may not be very much for as single guy, but bring your family over and you soon get someone earning 8K a year, "contributing" 300 quid in NI and taxes and then leaching 20 grand a year in benefits. We can't stop Brits doing this, but we damned well ought to be able top stop foreigners doing it If I were you, I'd be more concerned about stopping the Brits doing it - it's the lazy, waste of space scum that won't work for a living that make that Septic Isle a ********, And look at the furore when the last Chancellor tried exactly that. (That's not to say that I disagree it is necessary, just that I don't believe it is deliverable) not the immigrants who do the jobs you're too lazy to. I'm not entirely sure why you are making such a personal jibe. I have never claimed a penny in benefit payments in my life, so whether I am too lazy or not to take on a particular type of work is no business of yours. tim |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 10:19:31 +0200
Robin9 wrote: ;157495 Wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:01:03 +0100 Recliner wrote:- On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:18:57 +0000 (UTC), d wrote:- firms whose staff end up earning less than the minimum wage. But hey, its an app so what do the Kool Kids care if they guy delivering their organic soya salad earns a pittance, he's just a grunt right?- http://tinyurl.com/h8vevqc ate-against-new-contract- Can't blame them. 3.75 per delivery is royally taking the ****. All those striking RMT ****s should have a good look at that to understand what poor pay and conditions really means. -- Spud Perhaps they do know what low pay and poor working conditions are! They want to make sure they're not inflicted on them. So you think if they don't go on strike every other month about some fatuous non-issue they'll suddenly find their 50K+ salaries dropped to mininum wage? You ever heard of UK contract law for permanent staff? Union bashers should never overlook the central truth that when we had strong unions in this country, working people did not have to let themselves be exploited. And union supporters should remember its 2016, not 1916. -- Spud |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 20:11:48 +0200
Robin9 wrote: It depends also on whether one thinks rationally! First of all, job mobility is a luxury for people who are not suffering extreme poverty. I'm quite sure that none of the Really? Explain how a couple of million east europeans and other assorted migrants manage to rock up here and get a job then. large number of people in this country currently working in exploitation circumstances finds job mobility within their grasp. If someone is young and single they have no excuse not to move around the place to find work other than laziness. -- Spud |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil Williams" wrote in message ... On 2016-08-11 13:10:24 +0000, tim... said: Though none of that is to say that I think the test isn't appropriate for Taxi drivers. I do think that they should be able to master conversational English, if they are targeting English speaking passengers. Unless I have the option to select an English speaking driver from a minicab company or Uber, that is *every* driver. It's not technically impossible for Uber to provide the option of language spoken and make sure that your request is satisfied. I'm sure that there are sufficient equality of supply of/demand for Urdu, Gujarati etc, for them to be offered as alternatives to English. But I doubt that offering Romanian or Bulgarian results in an equality of supply & demand. tim |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 20:11:48 +0200 Robin9 wrote: It depends also on whether one thinks rationally! First of all, job mobility is a luxury for people who are not suffering extreme poverty. I'm quite sure that none of the Really? Explain how a couple of million east europeans and other assorted migrants manage to rock up here and get a job then. because they are not the ones from East Europe who are in extreme poverty those have to stay behind tim |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:50:03 +0100
"tim..." wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 20:11:48 +0200 Robin9 wrote: It depends also on whether one thinks rationally! First of all, job mobility is a luxury for people who are not suffering extreme poverty. I'm quite sure that none of the Really? Explain how a couple of million east europeans and other assorted migrants manage to rock up here and get a job then. because they are not the ones from East Europe who are in extreme poverty those have to stay behind Extreme poverty is relative. The chavs here would think it means not being able to afford Sky Sports and an extra packet of fags a week. -- Spud |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 12:26:08 on Mon, 15 Aug
2016, tim... remarked: I have never claimed a penny in benefit payments in my life, so whether I am too lazy or not to take on a particular type of work is no business of yours. Not having children removes a person from many forms of benefit, whether tax breaks, tax credits, child benefit(sic), or a lower threshold for things like income support, housing benefit(sic) and council tax benefit(sic). I never claimed unemployment benefit between jobs until a PPI (yes, I know) policy on a mortgage wouldn't pay out unless I registered as unemployed, as well as in fact being laid off and having a P45 to prove it. Complying with all the DWP requirements[1] felt like a full time job in its own right. [1] Some of which seemed similar to a redundant Concorde pilot being required to spend a certain number of hours a day scouring job ads just in case there were any vacancies for Concorde pilots outside of BA/Air France. -- Roland Perry |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... In article , (tim...) wrote: wrote in message ... In article , (Someone Somewhere) wrote: I thought it was a bit of an exaggeration, but then I used on online calculator (www.entitledto.co.uk), claiming I worked 20 hours a week for 8K per annum and was single with 4 kids, living in a band C council property in Tower Hamlets with a rent of £120 a week. This is what it came out with: Initial Tax Credit £14,996.10 £288.39 This figure is based on the income you received last year. The Tax Credits figure shown below is based on your current income amount. Tax Credits £14,996.10 £288.39 Working tax credit and child tax credit. Council Tax Support £364.52 £6.99 Your full Council Tax bill of £15.30 per week will be reduced to £8.31 per week because of your entitlement to Council Tax Support. The amount you get can be affected by other benefits. We have included the amounts we have calculated for Working Tax Credit (£63.91 per week). Housing Benefit £4,835.39 £92.99 Your full rent of £120.00 per week will be reduced by £92.99 per week because of your entitlement to Housing Benefit. This means you will have to pay £27.01 each week. The amount you get can be affected by other benefits. We have included the amounts we have calculated for Working Tax Credit (£63.91 per week). Child Benefit £3,213.60 £61.80 Total Entitlements £23,409.61 £450.17 So, £23k - even more than was claimed! and falling. hence the reason why I plumped for 20K instead of the current maximum of 23K When does child benefit beyond 2nd child stop? It doesn't (the proposal was for Child Tax Credits to be restricted to first 2 children, but that got quashed in the Lords along with the other recent changes) I accept that my suggestion that someone can get 20K in benefits from earning 8K per annum in uncommon, but it most certainly isn't the complete fiction that you suggested it was I thought the switch to Universal Credit was going to penalise children after the first 2? The point made after the Lords defeat was that it was only temporary. I think it's only for children born after a certain date. Existing claimants will keep it. James |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sadiq Khan and the Central Line | London Transport | |||
Sadiq Khan to review Tube ticket office closures | London Transport | |||
Sadiq Khan and TfL on taxis and minicabs | London Transport | |||
TFL and minicabs. | London Transport | |||
Taxis and the congestion charge | London Transport |