tim... wrote:

"Recliner" wrote in message
...
Mizter T wrote:

On 25/09/2016 12:16, Recliner wrote:
There's a short item in today's Sunday Times that suggests that the
government is favouring the Heathrow Hub option:
http://www.heathrowhub.com

This is cheaper than the third runway, needs much less land (and very
few
properties will be affected), will be much quicker to build, and will
not
increase the noise footprint nearly as much. The scheme as proposed (not
by
HAL) also includes a road-rail interchange on the M4 and GWML (and
possibly
an HS2 spur), immediately to the north of the airport, with a direct
light
rail link to the terminals. However, I think that's really a separate
idea.

Crucially, BA is backing this scheme, rather than the third runway:
http://news.sky.com/story/ba-owner-s...cheme-10319759



Interesting. Especially given that the Heathrow Hub proposal was
rejected by the Airports Commission.

If Heathrow is the government's choice then it's still going to face
some almighty opposition, though perhaps given the whole Heathrow
question has been going on for so long - a 'war of attrition' if you
will - maybe some of that opposition could fall by the wayside.

Poyle would be razed under the scheme - much of the area is a trading
estate, though there are some residential streets south of Bath Rd that
would have to go. (As would the current T5 Pod Parking!)

More Heathrow rumours:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...e-in-parliame/



That's hardly a surprise, it will be carried by labour votes

Yes, most of the high profile opponents are Tories. One exception is John
Mcdonnell, the local MP, and Corbyn's minder:

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3355941.html

More Heathrow rumours:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...e-in-parliame/

For those of us too posh to read the Telegraph, the FT says the same thing:

https://www.ft.com/content/d84abea2-...sharetype=gift

Rather vague about whether it'd be the third runway or Hub, though.