![]() |
Battersea extension
|
Battersea extension
In message , at 13:46:17 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked: On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:28:02 +0100 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 13:10:15 on Thu, 13 Oct 2016, d remarked: My original point was I found out his home address from his usenet post in literally 10 seconds flat. And my point is "why do I care". Assuming it's not the address of my accountant, of course. Whether you care is irrelevant. Just demonstrating that perhaps before accusing other people of ignorance of the ways of the internet you should take a look in the mirror first. I know perfectly well about the "ways of the Internet", which is why this particular aspect is somewhere between "doesn't worry me" and "that genie escaped the bottle long ago". Also you'd have to have a pretty stupid accountant for him to allow you to use his home address since that is clearly not solely a business premises. If I was "in hiding" he could be doing it as a favour. -- Roland Perry |
Battersea extension
|
Battersea extension
In message , at 17:31:43 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, tim... remarked: electoral roll, planning permission applications[1], do they have names on? The former would be pretty useless without names on, and yes, the latter do, or I wouldn't have mentioned it. -- Roland Perry |
Battersea extension
"Roland Perry" electoral roll, planning permission applications[1], do they have names on? The former would be pretty useless without names on, and yes, the latter do, or I wouldn't have mentioned it. I recently discovered Part-B-Entitlement-to-register-March-2010.pdf Some special category electors must be entered on the register without their qualifying address or without their name and qualifying address. Further information on such electors can be found in Part F, ‘Special category electors’. http://www.electoralcommission.org.u...March-2010.pdf -- Mike D |
Battersea extension
In message , at 21:27:39 on Fri, 14
Oct 2016, Michael R N Dolbear remarked: electoral roll, planning permission applications[1], do they have names on? The former would be pretty useless without names on, and yes, the latter do, or I wouldn't have mentioned it. I recently discovered Part-B-Entitlement-to-register-March-2010.pdf Some special category electors must be entered on the register without their qualifying address or without their name and qualifying address. Further information on such electors can be found in Part F, ‘Special category electors’. http://www.electoralcommission.org.u...ral_commission _pdf_file/0011/43958/Part-F-Special-category-electors-March-2010.pdf Yes, I'm aware of that[1] and this precaution is only available after you've been at risk, and obviously can't be retrospective to previous electoral rolls and those databases which have scraped them. It's very much for the situation I mentioned earlier, of going into hiding after your safety has been compromised. [1] There was also some hiccup along the lines they forgot to make the list of special category electors immune from FOI requests. -- Roland Perry |
Battersea extension
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:18:39 +0100
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 13:49:22 on Thu, 13 Oct 2016, d remarked: On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:30:32 +0100 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 13:07:52 on Thu, 13 Oct Stalking doesn't "just happen". Even nutters don't pick a random person to stalk, there's always a reason. Precisely so. If someone wants to stalk you they'll do irregardless of an accommodation address on your email domain. You can't stalk someone you can't find. Of course you can. You can stalk them at work or even drum roll over the Internet. How exactly do you "stalk" someone over a computer network? Send them nasty emails and tweets? Aww, diddums. Anyone who is bothered by that needs to grow a pair. And if you can't find someone you can't stalk them at work either can you? And if you could find them at work you could follow them home too. Is it? I'd be far more concerned with someone turning up on the doorstep with a knife than someone sending me nasty texts or emails or finding out my CC number and buying crap on amazon. YMMV however. You must lead an exciting life for people to become that upset with you. It seems to bother you since you're involved in stalking. Perhaps talking from experience? -- Spud |
Battersea extension
|
Battersea extension
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:24:45 +0100
Roland Perry wrote: Although of course that's trolling rather than stalking. Quite. And if you can't find someone you can't stalk them at work either can you? And if you could find them at work you could follow them home too. It's not necessarily the case that every work stalker follows the victim home. You'd expect that as the obvious escalation though. -- Spud |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk