In article , (tim...)
wrote:

I think you misspelt "anyone with something to hide..."

I think that's unfair

especially from a person who spends his spare time discussing the
minutiae of Stalker Protection legislation with government

I have to agree.

My company is registered several hundred miles from me, and mail is
forwarded, specifically beause of stalking.

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
Please Help us dispose of unwanted virtual currency:
Bitcoin: 1LzAJBqzoaEudhsZ14W7YrdYSmLZ5m1seZ

In message , at 10:43:46 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, tim... remarked:

Don't flatter yourself. If you put your home address in a public
repository that can be accessed by anyone with half a clue then more
fool you. Anyone with any sense registers their domain at their
accountants address or failing that a P.O Box.

I think you misspelt "anyone with something to hide..."

I think that's unfair

especially from a person who spends his spare time discussing the
minutiae of Stalker Protection legislation with government

Some stalking prevention measures can be very effective, but hiding
where you've been living for years (rather than where you moved to last
week to avoid the stalker) is extremely low on the list, and in our
modern big-data[3] world virtually impossible anyway.

Yes, I'd like to see people thinking more seriously about whether
people's names and addresses should be scrapeable from Companies House,
electoral roll, planning permission applications[1], and various other
places[2] plus DVLA, Nominet, Verisign and so on. But that's a lost
cause at the moment because the law says it's preferable for the public
to be able to check up on who you really are, than to protect these
persons on the registers from stalkers.

[1] yes Mr Hayter, that's you.
[2] all which then turn up at 192.com
[3] Leaking location via social media too.
--
Roland Perry

In message , at 10:04:52 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:

I think you misspelt "anyone with something to hide..."

I think that's unfair

especially from a person who spends his spare time discussing the minutiae
of Stalker Protection legislation with government

I don't think he really gets irony.

Odd when that's what my post was

ps Did I miss your guess at my car's colour?
--
Roland Perry

In message , at 11:22:00
on Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Paul Cummins
remarked:
I think you misspelt "anyone with something to hide..."

I think that's unfair

especially from a person who spends his spare time discussing the
minutiae of Stalker Protection legislation with government

I have to agree.

My company is registered several hundred miles from me, and mail is
forwarded, specifically beause of stalking.

That's an understandable move once you have become a victim. I presume
the previous registered address of your company isn't where you are
living now, but before the stalking started, because that would be a
dead give-away.
--
Roland Perry

On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:31:23 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:04:52 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:

I think you misspelt "anyone with something to hide..."

I think that's unfair

especially from a person who spends his spare time discussing the minutiae
of Stalker Protection legislation with government

I don't think he really gets irony.

Odd when that's what my post was

ps Did I miss your guess at my car's colour?

No idea given the blue saab is the only one in the picture, but sometimes a
bluff produces results. Ask a poker player My guess is you no longer have a
car - probably an organic meat free rickshaw with the seat padded with old
copies of The Guardian or something.

--
Spud

On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:33:20 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 11:22:00
on Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Paul Cummins
remarked:
I think you misspelt "anyone with something to hide..."

I think that's unfair

especially from a person who spends his spare time discussing the
minutiae of Stalker Protection legislation with government

I have to agree.

My company is registered several hundred miles from me, and mail is
forwarded, specifically beause of stalking.

That's an understandable move once you have become a victim. I presume

Its an understandable move before you become a victim, specifically to prevent
it.

--
Spud

In message , at 10:39:34 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:

ps Did I miss your guess at my car's colour?

No idea given the blue saab is the only one in the picture, but sometimes a
bluff produces results. Ask a poker player My guess is you no longer have a
car - probably an organic meat free rickshaw with the seat padded with old
copies of The Guardian or something.

I have only one car a a time, including now. Keep struggling.
--
Roland Perry

In message , at 10:44:07 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:
My company is registered several hundred miles from me, and mail is
forwarded, specifically beause of stalking.

That's an understandable move once you have become a victim. I presume

Its an understandable move before you become a victim, specifically to prevent
it.

Not unless you expect loads of outraged customers coming to beating on
your door. And you don't "prevent yourself being stalked", like catching
a cold it 'just happens'. Hiding your address is only going to thwart a
small subset of stalking activity, and is virtually useless unless
you've moved to get away from the stalker.
--
Roland Perry

In article , (Roland
Perry) wrote:

That's an understandable move once you have become a victim. I
presume the previous registered address of your company isn't where
you are living now, but before the stalking started, because that
would be a dead give-away.

The Registered address is in a different country, the previous company
was wound up and assetts transferred, and with consent of Companies House,
the director is of a different name than the previous one.

Additionally, I have never posted in my legal name in any case, and I'm
not on the Electoral Roll that the public can see (even in person at the
Council Offices), which doesn't stop several people from still trying to
find me.

I have a current police investigation ongoing.

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
Please Help us dispose of unwanted virtual currency:
Bitcoin: 1LzAJBqzoaEudhsZ14W7YrdYSmLZ5m1seZ

On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:39:34 +0000 (UTC), d wrote:

On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:31:23 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:04:52 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:

I think you misspelt "anyone with something to hide..."

I think that's unfair

especially from a person who spends his spare time discussing the minutiae
of Stalker Protection legislation with government

I don't think he really gets irony.

Odd when that's what my post was

ps Did I miss your guess at my car's colour?

No idea given the blue saab is the only one in the picture, but sometimes a
bluff produces results. Ask a poker player My guess is you no longer have a
car - probably an organic meat free rickshaw with the seat padded with old
copies of The Guardian or something.

We already know from Roland's postings here what his current car is,
including what kind of transmission it has.