On 16/11/2016 14:49, Martin Coffee wrote:
On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news

wrote in message news On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=

Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

Why couldn't you be bothered to see who he was replying to?

Martin Coffee wrote:
On 16/11/16 15:27, Recliner wrote:
Martin Coffee wrote:
On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news
wrote in message news On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=
Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

It's a verb, not a noun.

But it's meaning in this case was obvious.

Yes, but your snarky Google reference just confirmed the error.

"Martin Coffee" wrote in message
news
On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news

wrote in message news On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=
Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

I did Google for it, it's a Verb

It is used as a Noun

tim

"Martin Coffee" wrote in message
news
On 16/11/16 15:27, Recliner wrote:
Martin Coffee wrote:
On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news
wrote in message
news On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16
Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this
country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about
their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted
to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=
Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

It's a verb, not a noun.

But it's meaning in this case was obvious.

Of course, that's how come I made the mistake in the first place.

I was surprised that the spell checker didn't throw it out because you can't
pluralise a verb, but, of course, it's the their person form

tim

On 16/11/2016 09:13, Optimist wrote:

There's another aspect here though - the referendum. Legislation for this had been passed by
Parliament last year. The people were told that the decision was theirs,

But who told them that? Or was the idea that it might be binding just an
assumption made by the kind of people who don't talk about trains using
a obscure format from the dark age of online communications?


--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:44:38 -0000, "tim..."
wrote:


"Martin Coffee" wrote in message
news
On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news
wrote in message news On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=
Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

I did Google for it, it's a Verb

It is used as a Noun

In Timmish maybe but not in English English.

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:53:06 +0000
Arthur Figgis wrote:
On 16/11/2016 09:13, Optimist wrote:

There's another aspect here though - the referendum. Legislation for this
had been passed by
Parliament last year. The people were told that the decision was theirs,

But who told them that? Or was the idea that it might be binding just an
assumption made by the kind of people who don't talk about trains using
a obscure format from the dark age of online communications?

The whole parliament must ratify nonsense is just another ploy by Remoaners
to block Brexit. Parliment exists to enact the will of the people, however if
the will of the people has already been made perfectly clear via a referendum
then the role of parliament is redundant in the matter. And whats more - if
parliament go against the will of the people then we're sliding into a
parliamentary dictatorship.

--
Spud

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:55:16 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:32:45 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:


So you don't want immigrants to UK to vote because they wern't born here
and you don't want people who were born here to be able to vote either.
That does not make any sense.

Born here and living here. If you've ****ed off to live in another country
you absolve any right to have an influence on whether your country of birth
remains in the EU since it is no longer your concern. And if all those chavs
and criminals living on the costas are worried about their status when we
exit then they should apply for Spanish citizenship. Ditto anywhere else.


So where can an immigrant vote - his original country or his new one?


--
Mark

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:07:51 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:55:16 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:32:45 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:


So you don't want immigrants to UK to vote because they wern't born here
and you don't want people who were born here to be able to vote either.
That does not make any sense.

Born here and living here. If you've ****ed off to live in another country
you absolve any right to have an influence on whether your country of birth
remains in the EU since it is no longer your concern. And if all those chavs
and criminals living on the costas are worried about their status when we
exit then they should apply for Spanish citizenship. Ditto anywhere else.


So where can an immigrant vote - his original country or his new one?

I couldn't care less.

--
Spud

"Charles Ellson" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:44:38 -0000, "tim..."
wrote:


"Martin Coffee" wrote in message
news
On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news
wrote in message
news On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16
Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this
country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about
their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted
to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=
Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

I did Google for it, it's a Verb

It is used as a Noun

In Timmish maybe but not in English English.

well that was the point

I wrongly used it as a noun (in fact all I did was pick the wrong word out
of the spell checker list :-)

And then I came back to make a joke of my mistake - an attempt that
backfired :-(

tim