Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#292
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Coffee wrote:
On 16/11/16 15:27, Recliner wrote: Martin Coffee wrote: On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote: "tim..." wrote in message news ![]() wrote in message news ![]() Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov 2016, d remarked: Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those immigrants won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark alley...). Racist and fascist. Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific. A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race. Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational thinking person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a playground insult designed to shut down debate. As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the right to question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives. Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native'). And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their opinions in this context anyway. apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to Hm, what on earth is an immigrate? Oops tim Google should be your friend. https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights= Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its meaning? It's a verb, not a noun. But it's meaning in this case was obvious. Yes, but your snarky Google reference just confirmed the error. |
#293
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Coffee" wrote in message news ![]() On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote: "tim..." wrote in message news ![]() wrote in message news ![]() Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov 2016, d remarked: Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those immigrants won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark alley...). Racist and fascist. Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific. A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race. Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational thinking person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a playground insult designed to shut down debate. As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the right to question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives. Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native'). And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their opinions in this context anyway. apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to Hm, what on earth is an immigrate? Oops tim Google should be your friend. https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights= Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its meaning? I did Google for it, it's a Verb It is used as a Noun tim |
#294
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Coffee" wrote in message news ![]() On 16/11/16 15:27, Recliner wrote: Martin Coffee wrote: On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote: "tim..." wrote in message news ![]() wrote in message news ![]() Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov 2016, d remarked: Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those immigrants won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark alley...). Racist and fascist. Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific. A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race. Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational thinking person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a playground insult designed to shut down debate. As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the right to question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives. Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native'). And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their opinions in this context anyway. apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to Hm, what on earth is an immigrate? Oops tim Google should be your friend. https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights= Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its meaning? It's a verb, not a noun. But it's meaning in this case was obvious. Of course, that's how come I made the mistake in the first place. I was surprised that the spell checker didn't throw it out because you can't pluralise a verb, but, of course, it's the their person form tim |
#295
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/11/2016 09:13, Optimist wrote:
There's another aspect here though - the referendum. Legislation for this had been passed by Parliament last year. The people were told that the decision was theirs, But who told them that? Or was the idea that it might be binding just an assumption made by the kind of people who don't talk about trains using a obscure format from the dark age of online communications? -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#296
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:44:38 -0000, "tim..."
wrote: "Martin Coffee" wrote in message news ![]() On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote: "tim..." wrote in message news ![]() wrote in message news ![]() Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov 2016, d remarked: Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those immigrants won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark alley...). Racist and fascist. Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific. A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race. Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational thinking person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a playground insult designed to shut down debate. As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the right to question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives. Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native'). And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their opinions in this context anyway. apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to Hm, what on earth is an immigrate? Oops tim Google should be your friend. https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights= Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its meaning? I did Google for it, it's a Verb It is used as a Noun In Timmish maybe but not in English English. |
#297
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:53:06 +0000
Arthur Figgis wrote: On 16/11/2016 09:13, Optimist wrote: There's another aspect here though - the referendum. Legislation for this had been passed by Parliament last year. The people were told that the decision was theirs, But who told them that? Or was the idea that it might be binding just an assumption made by the kind of people who don't talk about trains using a obscure format from the dark age of online communications? The whole parliament must ratify nonsense is just another ploy by Remoaners to block Brexit. Parliment exists to enact the will of the people, however if the will of the people has already been made perfectly clear via a referendum then the role of parliament is redundant in the matter. And whats more - if parliament go against the will of the people then we're sliding into a parliamentary dictatorship. -- Spud |
#298
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:55:16 +0000 (Mark Bestley) wrote: wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:32:45 +0000 (Mark Bestley) wrote: Roland Perry wrote: So you don't want immigrants to UK to vote because they wern't born here and you don't want people who were born here to be able to vote either. That does not make any sense. Born here and living here. If you've ****ed off to live in another country you absolve any right to have an influence on whether your country of birth remains in the EU since it is no longer your concern. And if all those chavs and criminals living on the costas are worried about their status when we exit then they should apply for Spanish citizenship. Ditto anywhere else. So where can an immigrant vote - his original country or his new one? -- Mark |
#299
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:07:51 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote: wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:55:16 +0000 (Mark Bestley) wrote: wrote: On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:32:45 +0000 (Mark Bestley) wrote: Roland Perry wrote: So you don't want immigrants to UK to vote because they wern't born here and you don't want people who were born here to be able to vote either. That does not make any sense. Born here and living here. If you've ****ed off to live in another country you absolve any right to have an influence on whether your country of birth remains in the EU since it is no longer your concern. And if all those chavs and criminals living on the costas are worried about their status when we exit then they should apply for Spanish citizenship. Ditto anywhere else. So where can an immigrant vote - his original country or his new one? I couldn't care less. -- Spud |
#300
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Ellson" wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:44:38 -0000, "tim..." wrote: "Martin Coffee" wrote in message news ![]() On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote: "tim..." wrote in message news ![]() wrote in message news ![]() Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov 2016, d remarked: Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those immigrants won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark alley...). Racist and fascist. Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific. A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race. Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational thinking person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a playground insult designed to shut down debate. As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the right to question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives. Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native'). And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their opinions in this context anyway. apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to Hm, what on earth is an immigrate? Oops tim Google should be your friend. https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights= Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its meaning? I did Google for it, it's a Verb It is used as a Noun In Timmish maybe but not in English English. well that was the point I wrongly used it as a noun (in fact all I did was pick the wrong word out of the spell checker list :-) And then I came back to make a joke of my mistake - an attempt that backfired :-( tim |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bye Bye Wolmar | London Transport | |||
"The Subterranean Railway" - Wolmar | London Transport |