![]() |
Tube drivers to strike on Southern strike days
|
Tube drivers to strike on Southern strike days
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:53:27 +0000
Recliner wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-38094257 Any organisation that indulges in deliberately anti-social practices should have all its bank accounts frozen and eventually wound up. Its time for the RMT to go. -- Spud |
Tube drivers to strike on Southern strike days
On Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:14:02 UTC, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:53:27 +0000 Recliner wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-38094257 Any organisation that indulges in deliberately anti-social practices should have all its bank accounts frozen and eventually wound up. Its time for the RMT to go. Surely they are pro-social practices. |
Tube drivers to strike on Southern strike days
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 07:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Offramp wrote: On Thursday, 24 November 2016 15:14:02 UTC, wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:53:27 +0000 Recliner wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-38094257 Any organisation that indulges in deliberately anti-social practices should have all its bank accounts frozen and eventually wound up. Its time for the RMT to go. Surely they are pro-social practices. I'd love to see your definition of pro-social. -- Spud |
Tube drivers to strike on Southern strike days
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0000, Recliner wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-38094257 which says, amongst other things "LU called the strikes "premature" as there were talks scheduled for Friday". While I'm normally a harsh critic of the RMT, LU are being silly here. The union is required to give at least 7 days notice of strike action, how awful of them to give more notice than is required. -- David Cantrell | Pope | First Church of the Symmetrical Internet It's my experience that neither users nor customers can articulate what it is they want, nor can they evaluate it when they see it -- Alan Cooper |
Tube drivers to strike on Southern strike days
On 25/11/2016 15:23, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0000, Recliner wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-38094257 which says, amongst other things "LU called the strikes "premature" as there were talks scheduled for Friday". While I'm normally a harsh critic of the RMT, LU are being silly here. The union is required to give at least 7 days notice of strike action, how awful of them to give more notice than is required. That's your interpretation of premature? Surely what LU mean is that there are still meetings scheduled to resolve the issue(s) and an escalation to strike action is therefore an unnecessary premature and provocative action, rather than just the date give for the strikes. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk