![]() |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
John Levine wrote:
I'm surprised a 737 can fly for 7 hours without refueling. What ****ty budget airline was dishing them up for long haul? Let us know so we can avoid it. It's the 737-700ER, with a range of 5,630 nm. That's enough to get from London to anywhere in the continental US. Not I suspect if you include fuel safety margins. It depends on the wind and the loading. LHR-LAX is 4741 nm, so well within the nominal range, but if the 737 has max payload and there's the usual headwind, it may be insufficient. I suppose, but since the last third of the flight is over southern Canada and the US, there'd be plenty of places to land and refuel if need be. |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
John Levine wrote:
John Levine wrote: I'm surprised a 737 can fly for 7 hours without refueling. What ****ty budget airline was dishing them up for long haul? Let us know so we can avoid it. It's the 737-700ER, with a range of 5,630 nm. That's enough to get from London to anywhere in the continental US. Not I suspect if you include fuel safety margins. It depends on the wind and the loading. LHR-LAX is 4741 nm, so well within the nominal range, but if the 737 has max payload and there's the usual headwind, it may be insufficient. I suppose, but since the last third of the flight is over southern Canada and the US, there'd be plenty of places to land and refuel if need be. True, it wouldn't be unsafe, but if headwinds are going to add an hour to the flight, and if the plane is fully loaded (and therefore unable to carry max fuel), they might as well plan a tech stop. |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 20:05:19 on Thu, 19 Jan 2017, tim... remarked: If anyone's at a loose end next week there's a 48-seat A319 corporate jet flying Sydney to Lisbon next week, for an 'up to 75% off' price of EUR110,000. I'm guessing that's the fuel and crew cost. so a full price of close to half a million Actually the list price for that flight is EUR 876,550 and it's an "empty leg". So someone else must have hired it one-way the opposite direction. oh for the whole plane load I thought you were quoting a per seat price (like the one that started this thread) tim |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
In message , at 22:35:29 on Fri, 20 Jan
2017, tim... remarked: If anyone's at a loose end next week there's a 48-seat A319 corporate jet flying Sydney to Lisbon next week, for an 'up to 75% off' price of EUR110,000. I'm guessing that's the fuel and crew cost. so a full price of close to half a million Actually the list price for that flight is EUR 876,550 and it's an "empty leg". So someone else must have hired it one-way the opposite direction. oh for the whole plane load I thought you were quoting a per seat price (like the one that started this thread) Seriously? You think it costs twenty million to hire a plane for a day! They cost "only" $90m new. -- Roland Perry |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:58:30 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 22:35:29 on Fri, 20 Jan 2017, tim... remarked: If anyone's at a loose end next week there's a 48-seat A319 corporate jet flying Sydney to Lisbon next week, for an 'up to 75% off' price of EUR110,000. I'm guessing that's the fuel and crew cost. so a full price of close to half a million Actually the list price for that flight is EUR 876,550 and it's an "empty leg". So someone else must have hired it one-way the opposite direction. oh for the whole plane load I thought you were quoting a per seat price (like the one that started this thread) Seriously? You think it costs twenty million to hire a plane for a day! They cost "only" $90m new. Probably a lot less than that in reality: nobody pays the list price for planes. |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
In message , at 12:10:52 on
Sat, 21 Jan 2017, Recliner remarked: If anyone's at a loose end next week there's a 48-seat A319 corporate jet flying Sydney to Lisbon next week, for an 'up to 75% off' price of EUR110,000. I'm guessing that's the fuel and crew cost. so a full price of close to half a million Actually the list price for that flight is EUR 876,550 and it's an "empty leg". So someone else must have hired it one-way the opposite direction. oh for the whole plane load I thought you were quoting a per seat price (like the one that started this thread) Seriously? You think it costs twenty million to hire a plane for a day! They cost "only" $90m new. Probably a lot less than that in reality: nobody pays the list price for planes. I thought most were leased. -- Roland Perry |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:06:09 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 12:10:52 on Sat, 21 Jan 2017, Recliner remarked: If anyone's at a loose end next week there's a 48-seat A319 corporate jet flying Sydney to Lisbon next week, for an 'up to 75% off' price of EUR110,000. I'm guessing that's the fuel and crew cost. so a full price of close to half a million Actually the list price for that flight is EUR 876,550 and it's an "empty leg". So someone else must have hired it one-way the opposite direction. oh for the whole plane load I thought you were quoting a per seat price (like the one that started this thread) Seriously? You think it costs twenty million to hire a plane for a day! They cost "only" $90m new. Probably a lot less than that in reality: nobody pays the list price for planes. I thought most were leased. Many are, but in which case the leasing company (quite possibly based in Ireland) paid much less than the list price. |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 22:35:29 on Fri, 20 Jan 2017, tim... remarked: If anyone's at a loose end next week there's a 48-seat A319 corporate jet flying Sydney to Lisbon next week, for an 'up to 75% off' price of EUR110,000. I'm guessing that's the fuel and crew cost. so a full price of close to half a million Actually the list price for that flight is EUR 876,550 and it's an "empty leg". So someone else must have hired it one-way the opposite direction. oh for the whole plane load I thought you were quoting a per seat price (like the one that started this thread) Seriously? You think it costs twenty million to hire a plane for a day! I didn't really think about it and in any case didn't know how many seats it had it could have been 6 tim |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:41:38 -0000, "tim..."
wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 22:35:29 on Fri, 20 Jan 2017, tim... remarked: If anyone's at a loose end next week there's a 48-seat A319 corporate jet flying Sydney to Lisbon next week, for an 'up to 75% off' price of EUR110,000. I'm guessing that's the fuel and crew cost. so a full price of close to half a million Actually the list price for that flight is EUR 876,550 and it's an "empty leg". So someone else must have hired it one-way the opposite direction. oh for the whole plane load I thought you were quoting a per seat price (like the one that started this thread) Seriously? You think it costs twenty million to hire a plane for a day! I didn't really think about it and in any case didn't know how many seats it had it could have been 6 The text you quoted said it had 48 seats. |
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet
"Recliner" wrote in message ... On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:41:38 -0000, "tim..." wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 22:35:29 on Fri, 20 Jan 2017, tim... remarked: If anyone's at a loose end next week there's a 48-seat A319 corporate jet flying Sydney to Lisbon next week, for an 'up to 75% off' price of EUR110,000. I'm guessing that's the fuel and crew cost. so a full price of close to half a million Actually the list price for that flight is EUR 876,550 and it's an "empty leg". So someone else must have hired it one-way the opposite direction. oh for the whole plane load I thought you were quoting a per seat price (like the one that started this thread) Seriously? You think it costs twenty million to hire a plane for a day! I didn't really think about it and in any case didn't know how many seats it had it could have been 6 The text you quoted said it had 48 seats. ok, i missed that as well :-( |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk