Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely
genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, 7 April 2017 22:03:49 UTC+1, Recliner wrote:
I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. I'll bet Euston and Finsbury Park were involved. But probably not Mile End. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Offramp wrote:
On Friday, 7 April 2017 22:03:49 UTC+1, Recliner wrote: I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. I'll bet Euston and Finsbury Park were involved. But probably not Mile End. No, none of those. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, 7 April 2017 22:03:49 UTC+1, Recliner wrote:
I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. I am not sure about the stocks, but I now think you ay have started on the Met, changed at Wembley Park for the Jube, then at Baker Street got on the Bakerloo. At some point I think you got on the District Line but I cannot think where that might have been, if not Mile End. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 04:27:38 -0700 (PDT), Offramp
wrote: On Friday, 7 April 2017 22:03:49 UTC+1, Recliner wrote: I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. I am not sure about the stocks, but I now think you ay have started on the Met, changed at Wembley Park for the Jube, then at Baker Street got on the Bakerloo. At some point I think you got on the District Line but I cannot think where that might have been, if not Mile End. No, I didn't use the District line at all (I'm counting the Met's S stock as the newest stock). Other than that, you're not too far off, but I was travelling south to north (so I finished on the Met, changing to it at Finchley Road). |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017\04\07 22:00, Recliner wrote:
I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. Clapham North - N - Stockwell - V (oldest) - Oggy Circus - B - Baker Street - J - Finchley Road - M (newest? Aren't the S7s newer than the S8s?) - Preston Road |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:33:12 +0100, Basil Jet
wrote: On 2017\04\07 22:00, Recliner wrote: I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. Clapham North - N - Stockwell - V (oldest) - Oggy Circus - B - Baker Street - J - Finchley Road - M (newest? Aren't the S7s newer than the S8s?) - Preston Road Yup, that's near enough the route, apart from slightly different start (Clapham Common) and end (Harrow-on-the-Hill) stations. The oldest stock, of course, is the Bakerloo's 1972 TS, not the Victoria Line's 2009 TS. I was treating all the S stock as one fleet (and you do sometimes get S7+1 stock on the Met). |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017\04\08 14:39, Recliner wrote:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:33:12 +0100, Basil Jet wrote: On 2017\04\07 22:00, Recliner wrote: I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. Clapham North - N - Stockwell - V (oldest) - Oggy Circus - B - Baker Street - J - Finchley Road - M (newest? Aren't the S7s newer than the S8s?) - Preston Road Yup, that's near enough the route, apart from slightly different start (Clapham Common) and end (Harrow-on-the-Hill) stations. The oldest stock, of course, is the Bakerloo's 1972 TS, not the Victoria Line's 2009 TS. g I forgot the 1967s had been replaced. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017\04\08 14:39, Recliner wrote:
Clapham North - N - Stockwell - V (oldest) - Oggy Circus - B - Baker Street - J - Finchley Road - M (newest? Aren't the S7s newer than the S8s?) - Preston Road Yup, that's near enough the route, apart from slightly different start (Clapham Common) and end (Harrow-on-the-Hill) stations. Oh! I'm surprised you didn't go via Marylebone then. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 21:00:45 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: I wondered how unusual my journey on LU today was? It was a completely genuine journey, not in any way contrived, and which I've done from time to time in the past. It involved five LU lines, with all four changes being cross-platform. It would have been possible to use fewer lines, but the journey would have been longer, and with less convenient interchanges. As on the previous times I've taken this route, all went very smoothly, with no delays or problems, and with no interchange requiring a wait longer than two minutes for the next train. As an aside, it used both LU's oldest and newest stock. You have way too much free time. Get a job! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Unusual terminal points on LU | London Transport | |||
Relaunched trivia: Unusual vehicles at Feltham Goods Yard | London Transport | |||
DMU's on Unusual Lines | London Transport | |||
An unusual request | London Transport | |||
Harrow: unusual taxi, the LU-owned market and the dead gasworks branch | London Transport |