Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:27:35 +0000 " wrote: On 18.12.17 10:10, wrote: On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:44:02 +0000 "Clive D.W. Feather" wrote: In article , writes Anyone know why there's an overhead wire on the southbound of highbury station (and maybe others, I didn't check) on the moorgate line? Its obviously not some old catenary since the line was always 3rd/4th rail and its only hung from the ceiling by some thin wires anyway. Is it in case a pan is left up at Drayton? I believe that's the case, yes; it's not powered, it's just to stop the pan disassembing itself on the tunnel roof. I've a vague memory that it was put in when the line was handed over to BR. That seemed the most likely scenario to me. Wonder how often the pan gets left up on that line? Must happen occasionally. Is there nothing that will force a pan drop? One Metro-North, for example, the M2 runs dual-mode DC on 3rd rail and AC under the wire. I assume that the same happens with the newer M8. As soon as that train's shoes come into contact with live 3rd rail, the pantographs automatically come down. The train will not take power, Thats a bit sophisticated for UK railways. Plus if it was done automatically the RMT would probably call a strike about taking work away from its members, thin end of the wedge, blah blah. I'm amazed we managed to get ATO anywhere in this country. Guess what? Drivers of ATO trains get paid more, or at least they did when it was first introduced. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:06:12 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:27:35 +0000 " wrote: On 18.12.17 10:10, wrote: On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:44:02 +0000 "Clive D.W. Feather" wrote: In article , writes Anyone know why there's an overhead wire on the southbound of highbury station (and maybe others, I didn't check) on the moorgate line? Its obviously not some old catenary since the line was always 3rd/4th rail and its only hung from the ceiling by some thin wires anyway. Is it in case a pan is left up at Drayton? I believe that's the case, yes; it's not powered, it's just to stop the pan disassembing itself on the tunnel roof. I've a vague memory that it was put in when the line was handed over to BR. That seemed the most likely scenario to me. Wonder how often the pan gets left up on that line? Must happen occasionally. Is there nothing that will force a pan drop? One Metro-North, for example, the M2 runs dual-mode DC on 3rd rail and AC under the wire. I assume that the same happens with the newer M8. As soon as that train's shoes come into contact with live 3rd rail, the pantographs automatically come down. The train will not take power, Thats a bit sophisticated for UK railways. Plus if it was done automatically the RMT would probably call a strike about taking work away from its members, thin end of the wedge, blah blah. I'm amazed we managed to get ATO anywhere in this country. Guess what? Drivers of ATO trains get paid more, or at least they did when it was first introduced. That doesn't surprise me. Another please-don't-strike bribe no doubt. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18.12.17 16:01, wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:27:35 +0000 " wrote: On 18.12.17 10:10, wrote: On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:44:02 +0000 "Clive D.W. Feather" wrote: In article , writes Anyone know why there's an overhead wire on the southbound of highbury station (and maybe others, I didn't check) on the moorgate line? Its obviously not some old catenary since the line was always 3rd/4th rail and its only hung from the ceiling by some thin wires anyway. Is it in case a pan is left up at Drayton? I believe that's the case, yes; it's not powered, it's just to stop the pan disassembing itself on the tunnel roof. I've a vague memory that it was put in when the line was handed over to BR. That seemed the most likely scenario to me. Wonder how often the pan gets left up on that line? Must happen occasionally. Is there nothing that will force a pan drop? One Metro-North, for example, the M2 runs dual-mode DC on 3rd rail and AC under the wire. I assume that the same happens with the newer M8. As soon as that train's shoes come into contact with live 3rd rail, the pantographs automatically come down. The train will not take power, Thats a bit sophisticated for UK railways. Plus if it was done automatically the RMT would probably call a strike about taking work away from its members, thin end of the wedge, blah blah. I'm amazed we managed to get ATO anywhere in this country. Also don't have door overrides in case of an overshoot. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/12/17 16:12, wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:06:12 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:27:35 +0000 " wrote: On 18.12.17 10:10, wrote: On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:44:02 +0000 "Clive D.W. Feather" wrote: In article , writes Anyone know why there's an overhead wire on the southbound of highbury station (and maybe others, I didn't check) on the moorgate line? Its obviously not some old catenary since the line was always 3rd/4th rail and its only hung from the ceiling by some thin wires anyway. Is it in case a pan is left up at Drayton? I believe that's the case, yes; it's not powered, it's just to stop the pan disassembing itself on the tunnel roof. I've a vague memory that it was put in when the line was handed over to BR. That seemed the most likely scenario to me. Wonder how often the pan gets left up on that line? Must happen occasionally. Is there nothing that will force a pan drop? One Metro-North, for example, the M2 runs dual-mode DC on 3rd rail and AC under the wire. I assume that the same happens with the newer M8. As soon as that train's shoes come into contact with live 3rd rail, the pantographs automatically come down. The train will not take power, Thats a bit sophisticated for UK railways. Plus if it was done automatically the RMT would probably call a strike about taking work away from its members, thin end of the wedge, blah blah. I'm amazed we managed to get ATO anywhere in this country. Guess what? Drivers of ATO trains get paid more, or at least they did when it was first introduced. That doesn't surprise me. Another please-don't-strike bribe no doubt. You're not an MP are you? "Everyone gets a 0 or 1% pay rise except us." |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:08:38 +0000
Martin Coffee wrote: On 18/12/17 16:12, wrote: Guess what? Drivers of ATO trains get paid more, or at least they did when it was first introduced. That doesn't surprise me. Another please-don't-strike bribe no doubt. You're not an MP are you? "Everyone gets a 0 or 1% pay rise except us." Driving a train is a blue collar job. It probably requires less skill than driving an HGV (which I have a license for invidentaly) or a bus. There's sod all reason for them to be paid 50K+ for driving a vehicle that does everything itself anyway except accelerate and brake even if not ATO. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , () wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:08:38 +0000 Martin Coffee wrote: On 18/12/17 16:12, wrote: Guess what? Drivers of ATO trains get paid more, or at least they did when it was first introduced. That doesn't surprise me. Another please-don't-strike bribe no doubt. You're not an MP are you? "Everyone gets a 0 or 1% pay rise except us." Driving a train is a blue collar job. It probably requires less skill than driving an HGV (which I have a license for invidentaly) or a bus. There's sod all reason for them to be paid 50K+ for driving a vehicle that does everything itself anyway except accelerate and brake even if not ATO. Showing your usual deep ignorance I see. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , (Clive D.W.
Feather) wrote: In article , writes Is there nothing that will force a pan drop? If it rises too high, it will drop automatically. I don't think there's any stock where the automatic power control magnets drop the pan - they just trip the main breaker instead. One Metro-North, for example, the M2 runs dual-mode DC on 3rd rail and AC under the wire. I assume that the same happens with the newer M8. As soon as that train's shoes come into contact with live 3rd rail, the pantographs automatically come down. What about in the reverse direction? You want the pan to come up while in the transition area. The train will not take power, however, until the engineer sets the power mode switch to the proper setting. On 313s there's an alarm that goes off in the cab while the train is drawing power from the supply that the AC/DC switch doesn't select. But that's all. I certainly hope that such control and alarm technology has moved on somewhat since the 313s were built over 40 years ago! -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:47:38 -0600
wrote: In article , () wrote: On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:08:38 +0000 Martin Coffee wrote: On 18/12/17 16:12, wrote: Guess what? Drivers of ATO trains get paid more, or at least they did when it was first introduced. That doesn't surprise me. Another please-don't-strike bribe no doubt. You're not an MP are you? "Everyone gets a 0 or 1% pay rise except us." Driving a train is a blue collar job. It probably requires less skill than driving an HGV (which I have a license for invidentaly) or a bus. There's sod all reason for them to be paid 50K+ for driving a vehicle that does everything itself anyway except accelerate and brake even if not ATO. Showing your usual deep ignorance I see. Feel free to fill us in on all the arduous tasks a train driver has to perform. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Changing from NR to Northern Line at Moorgate | London Transport | |||
City Thameslink overhead wires | London Transport | |||
A Moorgate to London Bridge Tunnel (Old chestnut) | London Transport | |||
Moorgate - Closed to WAGN for 1 year | London Transport | |||
Trains to Moorgate now go via Liverpool Street | London Transport |