![]() |
Signal failure at Victoria
Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44721415 -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Signal failure at Victoria
To be accurate it's a power outage in Streatham.
|
Signal failure at Victoria
In message , at 09:58:26 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018,
Graeme Wall remarked: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44721415 I smell a rat. It's extremely unlikely that Network Rail has experienced the simultaneous failure of three separate incoming grid feeds, nor would it take all day to get just one of them re-instated. This sounds like the *Network Rail* equipment which merges the three feeds into the supply to the signalling centre has gone up in smoke. Any other electricity supply issues reported overnight in Stretham? -- Roland Perry |
Signal failure at Victoria
In message , at 09:58:26 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018,
Graeme Wall remarked: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44721415 It just did: 11:23 Disruption expected until 7am tomorrow National Rail has now said disruption will continue until at least 7am tomorrow morning (Friday, July 6). -- Roland Perry |
Signal failure at Victoria
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 09:58:26 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Graeme Wall remarked: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44721415 I smell a rat. It's extremely unlikely that Network Rail has experienced the simultaneous failure of three separate incoming grid feeds, nor would it take all day to get just one of them re-instated. This sounds like the *Network Rail* equipment which merges the three feeds into the supply to the signalling centre has gone up in smoke. Any other electricity supply issues reported overnight in Stretham? Presumably you’re referring to the tweet referenced in that article “Passengers are advised not to travel from the South into London this morning due to total loss of signalling power that Network Rail has experienced on 3 separate supplies in Streatham area.”? I see no suggestion that it’s external rather than railway-internal power supplies which have failed. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
Signal failure at Victoria
In message , at 11:50:20 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018,
Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked: Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:58:26 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Graeme Wall remarked: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44721415 I smell a rat. It's extremely unlikely that Network Rail has experienced the simultaneous failure of three separate incoming grid feeds, nor would it take all day to get just one of them re-instated. This sounds like the *Network Rail* equipment which merges the three feeds into the supply to the signalling centre has gone up in smoke. Any other electricity supply issues reported overnight in Stretham? Presumably you’re referring to the tweet referenced in that article “Passengers are advised not to travel from the South into London this morning due to total loss of signalling power that Network Rail has experienced on 3 separate supplies in Streatham area.”? I see no suggestion that it’s external rather than railway-internal power supplies which have failed. It's one signalling centre which is without power, thus the "three supplies" must be those for that centre. Here's another report from Network Rail (via Simon Calder): "A generator has been sourced to isolate the power feed and is expected to arrive at the signalling centre later this morning. Once the generator arrives, the situation will be re-assessed." Note, not three generators, one for each of hypothetically three separate sites. -- Roland Perry |
Signal failure at Victoria
In message , at 13:34:01 on Thu, 5 Jul
2018, Roland Perry remarked: In message , at 11:50:20 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked: Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:58:26 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Graeme Wall remarked: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44721415 I smell a rat. It's extremely unlikely that Network Rail has experienced the simultaneous failure of three separate incoming grid feeds, nor would it take all day to get just one of them re-instated. This sounds like the *Network Rail* equipment which merges the three feeds into the supply to the signalling centre has gone up in smoke. Any other electricity supply issues reported overnight in Stretham? Presumably you’re referring to the tweet referenced in that article “Passengers are advised not to travel from the South into London this morning due to total loss of signalling power that Network Rail has experienced on 3 separate supplies in Streatham area.”? I see no suggestion that it’s external rather than railway-internal power supplies which have failed. It's one signalling centre which is without power, thus the "three supplies" must be those for that centre. Here's another report from Network Rail (via Simon Calder): "A generator has been sourced to isolate the power feed and is expected to arrive at the signalling centre later this morning. Once the generator arrives, the situation will be re-assessed." Note, not three generators, one for each of hypothetically three separate sites. Note that I've seen the post-mortems of various data centre power outages. They typically have two grid power feeds, plus generators/UPS on site. What almost always goes wrong (apart from there being no fuel in the generator tanks because they've been doing too much test-running) is that occasionally the fail-over mechanisms, err, fail. [When they work, few outsiders get to hear about it] While I'm not speculating about the precise cause of this particular incident, what's happened before is one of two alternate power feeds failing for a random reason (the kind of back-hoe or other incident which is why you have two feeds in the first place), then the "fuses blowing" on the second feed, because instead of the feeds being sized for (say) 40% each in normal circumstances, thus 80% when one is operating alone; they turn out to have been supplying 60% each, and when one fails the other can't supply 120%. Anyway, here's a recent example of failing fail-over in a different transport industry: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/0...data_centre_co nfiguration/ -- Roland Perry |
Signal failure at Victoria
On 05/07/2018 11:28, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 09:58:26 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Graeme Wall remarked: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44721415 I smell a rat. Of course it could be a rat (probably fried) & I bet a lot of equipment cabinets are not designed to dissipate the sort of heat we currently have. I remember building simple circuits and seeing how tolerant they were to both low and high temperatures as they were to be in a field. |
Signal failure at Victoria
On 05/07/2018 14:50, Jim Chisholm wrote:
On 05/07/2018 11:28, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:58:26 on Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Graeme Wall remarked: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44721415 I smell a rat. Of course it could be a rat (probably fried) & I bet a lot of equipment cabinets are not designed to dissipate the sort of heat* we currently have. I remember building simple circuits and seeing how tolerant they were to both low and high temperatures as they were to be in a field. I wonder how often failures like this occur in India due to heat? We do have hot summers and cold winters -- perhaps not to the same degree and length, respectively, as India and Russia, but nonetheless we are hit with weather extremes. |
Signal failure at Victoria
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk