Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:33:58 +0100
The Other Mike wrote: On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:46:47 +0000 (UTC), wrote: the sand, forget this idea of a two minute charge because thats how long it takes for your hydrocarbon car to refuel to do 600 miles to the back end of nowhere without stopping for urinating or whatever and realise the average car is, with absolute certainty, sat doing absolutely nothing but depreciating for many thousands of hours a year. Around half of that almost certainly at home. So what? Its the energy that it uses when it is moving thats the issue. Really? No wait, what am I thinking - its the energy they use when they're switched off and not moving that really matters! When I last commuted to work by car it was a round trip of about 40 miles, say 2 gallons of diesel which is approx 300 million joules of energy. 20mpg from a diesel 'car'? I could nearly get that from a UNIMOG This involved heavy traffic and is a real world mpg, not what you might have been suckered into believing in the EU test figures. Now I don't know about you, but I suspect an extra 240 * 30 = 7.2KW load multiplied by however many houses have electric cars multiplied by 7 hours will be quite a bit extra for the local substation to cope with. How about using real world kWh/distance travelled published for all commercially available electric cars rather than 'guessing'? Guessing? Sorry, was that pre-school maths too complex for you? Plus get this idea out of your head that everyone today drives around with a near full tank of hydrocarbon fuel and/or they all need to do x hundred miles a day and they need to emulate anything even remotely resembling your declared 'charging' regime There are enough people who do high mileages for whom an electric car currently is not viable. Sure, for the old lady who only goes to the supermarket once a week or the guy who drives 2 miles to work and back - win. 27kWh spread across 100 hours per week 'at home', or just 270W when on charge Recharge with 270W? LOL , yeah ok, if you hardly went anywhere you could trickle charge on that ![]() Here's some facts for you - a nissan leaf has a 40kwh battery. So to do a full recharge with 270W assuming no losses would take: 40,000 / 270 / 24 = 6 *DAYS* Feel free to point out where I've made an error in that. Or do you think a 6 day recharge time is reasonable? |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Williamson wrote:
My brother owns an electric car. When it was new, it did about 100 miles per charge, so it was useful for trips to his kids' sports fixtures in the same county as well as going shopping in the nearest town a few miles away. After less than 5 years, he has to get his Ford Focus out if it's more than a 60 mile round trip. Also, when his electric car was new, he could just plug in to one of the (then rare) charging points and top it up for free while he was shopping. Now, he is not guaranteed a charge when he's away from home as the points are all being hogged by plug in hybrids, and he has to pay to top up due to changes in the systems. Progress... What model of car is it? All are not created equal. The battery lifetimes seem much worse on those without a battery temperature management system (eg Nissan Leaf), against those with liquid cooling. Theo |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
36 more electric buses for London | London Transport | |||
New electric buses | London Transport | |||
Electric buses | London Transport | |||
Electric Buses for TfL routes 507 and 521 | London Transport | |||
Longer trains for Waterloo-Reading, Waterloo-Windsor lines | London Transport |