Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
https://www.citymetric.com/transport...bury-park-4277
The article is illustrated with a splendid example of a shabby GN 313, with its previous FCC branding peeping out from underneath. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 15 October 2018 15:18:20 UTC+1, Recliner wrote:
https://www.citymetric.com/transport...bury-park-4277 The article is illustrated with a splendid example of a shabby GN 313, with its previous FCC branding peeping out from underneath. Many thanks. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Recliner
writes https://www.citymetric.com/transport...ern-city-line- history-moorgate-finsbury-park-4277 At least two blatantly obvious errors in it, even though they cited my web site. -- Clive D.W. Feather |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
In article , Recliner writes https://www.citymetric.com/transport...ern-city-line- history-moorgate-finsbury-park-4277 At least two blatantly obvious errors in it, even though they cited my web site. Yes, it's quite a lightweight article, written by a generalist reporter, but is quite a nice summary of the line's surprisingly complex history. It's also a reminder that TfL is a bit naughty to omit both this line and Thameslink from the Tube map. It's not helpful to passengers, who don't care if a line is run by LU, LO or GTR. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Recliner wrote: It's also a reminder that TfL is a bit naughty to omit both this line and Thameslink from the Tube map. It's not helpful to passengers, who don't care if a line is run by LU, LO or GTR. It's on the rail and tube services map which is the useful one these days. -- Regards, John Levine, , Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 03:03:02 on Tue, 16 Oct 2018,
John Levine remarked: It's also a reminder that TfL is a bit naughty to omit both this line and Thameslink from the Tube map. It's not helpful to passengers, who don't care if a line is run by LU, LO or GTR. It's on the rail and tube services map which is the useful one these days. Showing it on tube maps would tend to lead people to expect a more frequent service than it offers. For an inner zone line, anyway. -- Roland Perry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 03:03:02 on Tue, 16 Oct 2018, John Levine remarked: It's also a reminder that TfL is a bit naughty to omit both this line and Thameslink from the Tube map. It's not helpful to passengers, who don't care if a line is run by LU, LO or GTR. It's on the rail and tube services map which is the useful one these days. Showing it on tube maps would tend to lead people to expect a more frequent service than it offers. For an inner zone line, anyway. It's better than many LO services, which are shown. So that logic doesn't work. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Levine wrote:
In article , Recliner wrote: It's also a reminder that TfL is a bit naughty to omit both this line and Thameslink from the Tube map. It's not helpful to passengers, who don't care if a line is run by LU, LO or GTR. It's on the rail and tube services map which is the useful one these days. How widely is that map displayed? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:37:42PM -0000, Recliner wrote:
It's also a reminder that TfL is a bit naughty to omit both this line and Thameslink from the Tube map. It's not helpful to passengers, who don't care if a line is run by LU, LO or GTR. It would make the map too complicated. It's *already* too complicated around the area where the Northern City line runs with all the indistinguishably orange lines. -- David Cantrell | Bourgeois reactionary pig I think the most difficult moment that anyone could face is seeing their domestic servants, whether maid or drivers, run away -- Abdul Rahman Al-Sheikh, writing on 25 Jan 2004 at http://www.arabnews.com/node/243486 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:47:58 +0100
David Cantrell wrote: On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:37:42PM -0000, Recliner wrote: It's also a reminder that TfL is a bit naughty to omit both this line and Thameslink from the Tube map. It's not helpful to passengers, who don't care if a line is run by LU, LO or GTR. It would make the map too complicated. It's *already* too complicated around the area where the Northern City line runs with all the indistinguishably orange lines. That might be a valid excuse if it wasn't for the fact that the moorgate branch was on the tube map for decades. And it was TfLs decision to have a uniform colour for all the Overground routes when they could easily have chosen seperate ones for the ELL, NLL and Goblin lines at the very least. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
This just in - tube journey not a nightmare! | London Transport | |||
It's not big, it's not clever - "Source who works for TfL" picks onpoor gullible journalist | London Transport | |||
Oyster & tube .. not scanning in | London Transport | |||
Tube doors not opening at station | London Transport | |||
Not to Do With London Transport | London Transport |