Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 08:04:06 on Thu, 4 Apr
2019, Someone Somewhere remarked: I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one or more of the stations by now? If so, then any associated workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that down any further. While they all might look identical in their orange outfits, in practice they have many different skills and are employed by many different contractors. Some skills/employments may be transferable, but lots aren't. -- Roland Perry |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 10:18:55 on Thu, 4 Apr 2019,
Recliner remarked: I think, by definition, some stations still have lots more work to do, which is why the opening has been delayed so much. I'm far from convinced the stations themselves are on the critical path. Signalling (installation/testing) is likely to be the main hold up. -- Roland Perry |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/04/2019 14:21, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 08:04:06 on Thu, 4 Apr 2019, Someone Somewhere remarked: I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one or more of the stations by now?Â* If so, then any associated workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that down any further. While they all might look identical in their orange outfits, in practice they have many different skills and are employed by many different contractors. Some skills/employments may be transferable, but lots aren't. True - but with a station you have the people who do lifts, who do tiles, who do other decoration, who install ticket barriers, the sparkies, etc etc, but each station at various times will need each of the sets... |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 15:52:30 on Thu, 4 Apr
2019, Someone Somewhere remarked: On 04/04/2019 14:21, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 08:04:06 on Thu, 4 Apr 2019, Someone Somewhere remarked: I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one or more of the stations by now?* If so, then any associated workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that down any further. While they all might look identical in their orange outfits, in practice they have many different skills and are employed by many different contractors. Some skills/employments may be transferable, but lots aren't. True - but with a station you have the people who do lifts, who do tiles, who do other decoration, who install ticket barriers, the sparkies, etc etc, but each station at various times will need each of the sets... That doesn't help much if the stations are being fitted out by different contracting firms. -- Roland Perry |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:52:30 on Thu, 4 Apr 2019, Someone Somewhere remarked: On 04/04/2019 14:21, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 08:04:06 on Thu, 4 Apr 2019, Someone Somewhere remarked: I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one or more of the stations by now?Â* If so, then any associated workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that down any further. While they all might look identical in their orange outfits, in practice they have many different skills and are employed by many different contractors. Some skills/employments may be transferable, but lots aren't. True - but with a station you have the people who do lifts, who do tiles, who do other decoration, who install ticket barriers, the sparkies, etc etc, but each station at various times will need each of the sets... That doesn't help much if the stations are being fitted out by different contracting firms. The actual workers are unlikely to be directly employed by the main contractors. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graeme Wall wrote:
On 03/04/2019 15:11, Basil Jet wrote: On 03/04/2019 11:47, Graeme Wall wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47787367 "None of the stations are yet finished" Surprising word order aside, that is staggering. How could every one of them be running late? Weren't they built by different contractors? I was rather confused by the statement that some sections were now operating, I assume they were referring to testing, though Paddington - Reading wasn't included Liverpool St ("upstairs") - Shenfield and Paddington ("upstairs") - Hayes are operated by TfL Rail using 345s; Padd-Heathrow stopper is operated by TfL Rail using 360s. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
Someone Somewhere wrote: On 03/04/2019 23:08, Recliner wrote: Someone Somewhere wrote: On 03/04/2019 15:24, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 03/04/2019 11:47, Graeme Wall wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47787367 "None of the stations are yet finished" Surprising word order aside, that is staggering. How could every one of them be running late? Weren't they built by different contractors? Yes. I suspect that once the opening was delayed, they cut back on the overtime working that would have been required for even the most complete stations to meet the December 2018 target date. It's cheaper to complete the stations at a more relaxed pace. How much overtime weere they planning to work? The delay was finally admitted 4 months before opening, which was 5 months ago - even if everyone was working double shifts they should have finished by now... I believe a few of the new stations could have been just about ready to open, but not necessarily complete, by the December target date; at least a couple were many months behind, and wouldn't have been able to open at all by then. Now, they can take their time to finish even the near-complete stations. It's obviously extraordinary that the widespread delays to the stations, train signalling and testing weren't noticed (or at least reported) by the management until so close to the planned opening date. Was it a deliberate cover-up, or just incompetence at the senior management and political levels (or both)? I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one or more of the stations by now? If so, then any associated workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that down any further. There's no point rushing to finish a station, then moth-balling it for a year or so. What they did have to finish quickly was any trackside work, such as installing the PEDs, so that it didn't get in the way of test running. In any case, the stations will be at different levels of completion. Some may still be having wiring, lifts and escalators installed, while the more complete ones are probably just getting the final decorative finishing. ....which are all likely to involve different teams of people. Getting the lifts finished earlier at one station doesn’t mean you’ll be able to send those same workers to complete the tiling at another station. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/04/2019 13:25, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote:
Recliner wrote: Someone Somewhere wrote: On 03/04/2019 23:08, Recliner wrote: Someone Somewhere wrote: On 03/04/2019 15:24, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 03/04/2019 11:47, Graeme Wall wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47787367 "None of the stations are yet finished" Surprising word order aside, that is staggering. How could every one of them be running late? Weren't they built by different contractors? Yes. I suspect that once the opening was delayed, they cut back on the overtime working that would have been required for even the most complete stations to meet the December 2018 target date. It's cheaper to complete the stations at a more relaxed pace. How much overtime weere they planning to work? The delay was finally admitted 4 months before opening, which was 5 months ago - even if everyone was working double shifts they should have finished by now... I believe a few of the new stations could have been just about ready to open, but not necessarily complete, by the December target date; at least a couple were many months behind, and wouldn't have been able to open at all by then. Now, they can take their time to finish even the near-complete stations. It's obviously extraordinary that the widespread delays to the stations, train signalling and testing weren't noticed (or at least reported) by the management until so close to the planned opening date. Was it a deliberate cover-up, or just incompetence at the senior management and political levels (or both)? I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one or more of the stations by now? If so, then any associated workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that down any further. There's no point rushing to finish a station, then moth-balling it for a year or so. What they did have to finish quickly was any trackside work, such as installing the PEDs, so that it didn't get in the way of test running. In any case, the stations will be at different levels of completion. Some may still be having wiring, lifts and escalators installed, while the more complete ones are probably just getting the final decorative finishing. ...which are all likely to involve different teams of people. Getting the lifts finished earlier at one station doesn’t mean you’ll be able to send those same workers to complete the tiling at another station. No but the lift people may well be the same lift people at different stations, ditto tilers and so on. Also, if you complete and mothball a station at least you know it's finished and you're not predicating your plan on the continued availability of different things or certain trades which may well have gone out of stock, changed or become unavailable before you get around to finishing the station. Also, what does it realistically cost to mothball a station as opposed to going slow on the construction? |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 05/04/2019 13:25, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote: Recliner wrote: Someone Somewhere wrote: On 03/04/2019 23:08, Recliner wrote: Someone Somewhere wrote: On 03/04/2019 15:24, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 03/04/2019 11:47, Graeme Wall wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47787367 "None of the stations are yet finished" Surprising word order aside, that is staggering. How could every one of them be running late? Weren't they built by different contractors? Yes. I suspect that once the opening was delayed, they cut back on the overtime working that would have been required for even the most complete stations to meet the December 2018 target date. It's cheaper to complete the stations at a more relaxed pace. How much overtime weere they planning to work? The delay was finally admitted 4 months before opening, which was 5 months ago - even if everyone was working double shifts they should have finished by now... I believe a few of the new stations could have been just about ready to open, but not necessarily complete, by the December target date; at least a couple were many months behind, and wouldn't have been able to open at all by then. Now, they can take their time to finish even the near-complete stations. It's obviously extraordinary that the widespread delays to the stations, train signalling and testing weren't noticed (or at least reported) by the management until so close to the planned opening date. Was it a deliberate cover-up, or just incompetence at the senior management and political levels (or both)? I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one or more of the stations by now? If so, then any associated workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that down any further. There's no point rushing to finish a station, then moth-balling it for a year or so. What they did have to finish quickly was any trackside work, such as installing the PEDs, so that it didn't get in the way of test running. In any case, the stations will be at different levels of completion. Some may still be having wiring, lifts and escalators installed, while the more complete ones are probably just getting the final decorative finishing. ...which are all likely to involve different teams of people. Getting the lifts finished earlier at one station doesn’t mean you’ll be able to send those same workers to complete the tiling at another station. No but the lift people may well be the same lift people at different stations, ditto tilers and so on. They probably all work for subcontractors or are self-employed anyway. Also, if you complete and mothball a station at least you know it's finished and you're not predicating your plan on the continued availability of different things or certain trades which may well have gone out of stock, changed or become unavailable before you get around to finishing the station. We're not talking about a delay of years, just taking a few weeks or months longer to complete the stations that were almost ready. Also, what does it realistically cost to mothball a station as opposed to going slow on the construction? It's not so much a case of deliberately going slow, but saving money by no longer working to a tight deadline. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The blog on Pc trouble shooting skills,Networking,Linux | London Transport | |||
Trouble finding a hotel! | London Transport | |||
Oyster trouble | London Transport | |||
A Little Trouble with my Oyster... | London Transport | |||
Driver in Trouble over Stone Throwers | London Transport |