Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#171
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#172
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/12/2019 11:42, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 15/12/2019 10:44, Robin wrote: On 15/12/2019 10:25, Graeme Wall wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:19, Robin wrote: On 14/12/2019 21:55, Graeme Wall wrote: Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. I don't know what you mean by "long term" but the ONS project the population of the UK continuing to increase through to 2043. After the middle of the century as the offspring of the baby boomers start to die out and the influence of effective contraception took hold from the mid 1960s onward. Thanks for calibrating "long term". While you may of course be right I'll merely note that the statisticians at Eurostat do not agree.Â* They project the UK population continuing to increase (albeit more slowly) through to 2100. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/po...ta/main-tables A quick look at the fertility table shows the rate in the UK varying from a low of 1.27 in inner London to a high of 1.97 in outer London for 2017. The general trend is consistently falling across the country over the 5 year period on the chart. I'm unclear if you are saying Eurostat have made mistakes in their projections of population growth continuing through to 2100. All I know is that fertility is not the only factor. -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
#173
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Basil Jet
writes On 15/12/2019 09:59, wrote: I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, I think the A1/A1M has two or three roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. Off the top of my head the only one I can think of is the Black Cat. Google Maps says that, after the A411 in Borehamwood, there are two at Biggleswade, one at Sandy, the Black Cat, then the A1167 at Scremerston. -- Clive D.W. Feather |
#174
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/12/2019 13:34, Robin wrote:
On 15/12/2019 11:42, Graeme Wall wrote: On 15/12/2019 10:44, Robin wrote: On 15/12/2019 10:25, Graeme Wall wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:19, Robin wrote: On 14/12/2019 21:55, Graeme Wall wrote: Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. I don't know what you mean by "long term" but the ONS project the population of the UK continuing to increase through to 2043. After the middle of the century as the offspring of the baby boomers start to die out and the influence of effective contraception took hold from the mid 1960s onward. Thanks for calibrating "long term". While you may of course be right I'll merely note that the statisticians at Eurostat do not agree.Â* They project the UK population continuing to increase (albeit more slowly) through to 2100. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/po...ta/main-tables A quick look at the fertility table shows the rate in the UK varying from a low of 1.27 in inner London to a high of 1.97 in outer London for 2017. The general trend is consistently falling across the country over the 5 year period on the chart. I'm unclear if you are saying Eurostat have made mistakes in their projections of population growth continuing through to 2100. All I know is that fertility is not the only factor. Just saying those figures are of the same order as the ones I derived from the New Scientist report on population changes a few months back. They will, inevitably, lead to a decline in the population in the long term. Defining that long term is a bit woolly but I would think the Eurostat projections are a mite pessimistic. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
#175
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:50:52 +0000
Basil Jet wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:59, wrote: I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, I think the A1/A1M has two or three roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. And the rest: Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden All in the same 50 mile stretch and all with queues during a weekday and thats before you take into account some tight curves and average speed camera enforced speed restrictions in the non motorway bedfordshire section. I made the mistake of driving to Edinburgh up the A1 about 5 years ago. Its not one I shall be repeating anytime soon though given the endless roadworks on the M1 with barely a worker to be seen for 5 miles at a time its a PITA going north out of London for any significant distance atm. |
#177
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:22:53 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 16:58:48 on Sat, 14 Dec 2019, remarked: Sure, it all goes to plan for a few years. Then ever more people start to use the route and in a decade or so you're back where you started except now the jams have twice as many cars with twice the pollution. The best example of this in the UK is the M25. No matter how much they widen it it just jams up again in a few years. It has 6 lanes each way around Heathrow yet they're still often jammed solid in the rush hour. So what do you do, widen it to 8 lanes, 10? Where does it stop? When they plan it better and segregate the long distance and local traffic. The problem with that bit of the M25 (and I lived *there* 25yrs ago and saw it first hand) was mixing them up. And how do you plan to segregate them? Either you allow local traffic onto the M25 or you close the junctions. The newest bit of A14 (remember, the road we are discussing) segregates them, just as the A1(M) north of Huntingdon does, the road which hasn't shown any sign of jamming up 20yrs later. I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, too much slowing down and speeding up and too many selfish truckers doing the tortoise race holding up a quarter mile of traffic as they pass each other at 0.5mph difference in order to gain 1 minute that they immediately lose at the next roundabout anyway. A1 is now roundabout free from Buckden to Newcastle tim |
#178
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:50:52 +0000 Basil Jet wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:59, wrote: I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, I think the A1/A1M has two or three roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. And the rest: Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" tim |
#179
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , tim...
writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. I have a vague memory that if you try to divide the UK by population into three equal parts with two east-west lines, one goes through St. Albans and the other through Peterborough. But I could be wrong and can't be bothered to seek out the data and reconstruct it. -- Clive D.W. Feather |
#180
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
In article , tim... writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. Neil lives in northeast London. I have a vague memory that if you try to divide the UK by population into three equal parts with two east-west lines, one goes through St. Albans and the other through Peterborough. But I could be wrong and can't be bothered to seek out the data and reconstruct it. There's a general drift of the population in a southerly direction, so such lines have probably moved south, too. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heathrow Garden City and railway plan | London Transport | |||
Strike contingency plan Walthamstow to Heathrow | London Transport | |||
Cunning Plan-Congestion Charge at Heathrow - Mike Clasper BAA Chief Executive | London Transport | |||
Livingstone's latest wheeze | London Transport | |||
Latest official Crossrail Line Diagram | London Transport |