Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/10/2019 17:47, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 17:40:30 on Fri, 25 Oct 2019, MissRiaElaine remarked: On 25/10/2019 16:49, Roland Perry wrote: I leave the suction cup and stalk on the windscreen, and the camera justÂ* clips to that. Very reliably/repeatably. If I had to adjust it daily itÂ* would drive me potty. And said scrote, seeing the suction cup (or even if you did remove it, the marks left by it, unless you cleaned the screen every time) would break in looking to see if you'd hidden the camera somewhere. I don't think I've ever seen a car that appeared to have been broken into like that. And for ÂŁ39 of dashcam, would they bother? Because they're scrotes, it's what they do. They can sell it for a tenner, enough for their next fix. My car got broken into once because (I assume) they thought the glass mounted aerial on the back window was connected to a (then common) fixed car phone. It wasn't, it was for my 70cm amateur band radio, which I'd taken with me. -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 17:40:30 on Fri, 25 Oct 2019, MissRiaElaine remarked: On 25/10/2019 16:49, Roland Perry wrote: I leave the suction cup and stalk on the windscreen, and the camera just clips to that. Very reliably/repeatably. If I had to adjust it daily it would drive me potty. And said scrote, seeing the suction cup (or even if you did remove it, the marks left by it, unless you cleaned the screen every time) would break in looking to see if you'd hidden the camera somewhere. I don't think I've ever seen a car that appeared to have been broken into like that. And for ÂŁ39 of dashcam, would they bother? It was a common thing when satnavs first came in and were expensive, now almost every vehicle has one or the driver uses a mobile phone there is no market , so it is rare. You would have to leave it in a real dodgy area for them to bother now, not impossible but unlikely. GH |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/10/2019 13:37, Arthur Conan Doyle wrote:
Graeme Wall wrote: Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! (Sorry - I had to.) Cardinal Biggles I assume? Monty Python - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAn7baRbhx4 I know, I was there! -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graeme Wall wrote:
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! (Sorry - I had to.) Cardinal Biggles I assume? Monty Python - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAn7baRbhx4 I know, I was there! Of course! Totally forgot. |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:40:30PM +0100, MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 25/10/2019 16:49, Roland Perry wrote: I leave the suction cup and stalk on the windscreen, and the camera just clips to that. Very reliably/repeatably. If I had to adjust it daily it would drive me potty. And said scrote, seeing the suction cup (or even if you did remove it, the marks left by it, unless you cleaned the screen every time) would break in looking to see if you'd hidden the camera somewhere. Not in my experience. I've had one of those things attached to my windscreen for years without any problems. -- David Cantrell | even more awesome than a panda-fur coat |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/10/2019 09:50, David Cantrell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:40:30PM +0100, MissRiaElaine wrote: On 25/10/2019 16:49, Roland Perry wrote: I leave the suction cup and stalk on the windscreen, and the camera just clips to that. Very reliably/repeatably. If I had to adjust it daily it would drive me potty. And said scrote, seeing the suction cup (or even if you did remove it, the marks left by it, unless you cleaned the screen every time) would break in looking to see if you'd hidden the camera somewhere. Not in my experience. I've had one of those things attached to my windscreen for years without any problems. You obviously haven't parked in some of the areas of Birmingham that I have, then. They'd have your car stripped bare and standing on bricks before you got back if you weren't careful. -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 28/10/2019 09:50, David Cantrell wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:40:30PM +0100, MissRiaElaine wrote: On 25/10/2019 16:49, Roland Perry wrote: I leave the suction cup and stalk on the windscreen, and the camera just clips to that. Very reliably/repeatably. If I had to adjust it daily it would drive me potty. And said scrote, seeing the suction cup (or even if you did remove it, the marks left by it, unless you cleaned the screen every time) would break in looking to see if you'd hidden the camera somewhere. Not in my experience. I've had one of those things attached to my windscreen for years without any problems. You obviously haven't parked in some of the areas of Birmingham that I have, then. They'd have your car stripped bare and standing on bricks before you got back if you weren't careful. Seems a lot of work just to get a dash cam. In practise every large conurbation will have areas where it will not be wise to leave a vehicle unattended without precautions but for most that isn’t day to day life and isn’t in the same league as parking in the car park of Sainsbury’s . GH |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fare dodgers | London Transport | |||
fare dodgers | London Transport | |||
fare dodgers | London Transport | |||
fare dodgers | London Transport | |||
fare dodgers | London Transport |