Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... Yes, you could probably call them a "guard". I think the passengers are happier with the concept of no guard rather than no driver, though. I'd still call them the driver because obviously they would still have to be drive the trains manually occasionally (as I believe they already do) to remain fully trained. And with the peak loadings on both lines they would have to be in the cab for several hours a day anyway. Dave |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Darren
] writes Andrew P Smith wrote: Wrong. Very wrong. You can't get rid of the drivers on the Central and Victoria, They are there for passenger safety and when the computer fails they can drive the train manually. They are also looking out for obstructions and people on the line etc. DLR train captains can drive the train manually from the control panel. I was sitting in the front on a DLR train once when the captain came and sat near me and said he was taking control because "the track workers were out", we I didnt see anyone, and after driving carefully to the next station he closed the controls back up and everything carried on auto, could it have been that he had a report of someone on the line? Quite possibly. -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Liney
writes If you read my post again you'll notice that I don't say that you could. I just said that you could dispense with them staying in the cab. Obviously they would have to be there when the trains are heavily loaded but during the off-peak time they could be in the main passenger areas and act as a reassuring presence. Wrong. Who is going to look out for obstructions on the track etc if they are in the 5th carriage..... They are also looking out for obstructions and people on the line etc. Yet this isn't a problem on the DLR. Which runs along purpose built track. But it still gets people walking on it now and then. DLR train captains can drive the train manually from the control panel. I know. But most of the time they don't and so can be in with the passengers. Your point being? -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew P Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Dave Liney writes the off-peak time they could be in the main passenger areas and act as a reassuring presence. Wrong. Who is going to look out for obstructions on the track etc if they are in the 5th carriage..... Wrong? About what? They aren't going to be a reassuring presence? I think you'll find that they would be. Yet this isn't a problem on the DLR. Which runs along purpose built track. But it still gets people walking on it now and then. Whereas the Central and Victoria lines run along general purpose roads along with bicycles and pedestrians? DLR train captains can drive the train manually from the control panel. I know. But most of the time they don't and so can be in with the passengers. Your point being? That although they are in with the passengers there doesn't seem to be a huge number of deaths on the DLR. Dave. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Liney
writes "Andrew P Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Dave Liney writes the off-peak time they could be in the main passenger areas and act as a reassuring presence. Wrong. Who is going to look out for obstructions on the track etc if they are in the 5th carriage..... Wrong? About what? They aren't going to be a reassuring presence? I think you'll find that they would be. Yes they would be a reassuring presence but I would much prefer to have the driver of the train driving it. I get nervous when I see the Captain of an aircraft walking back through the cabin for anything other than a wee wee (in the toilet that is - not the cabin!!!!!!) Yet this isn't a problem on the DLR. Which runs along purpose built track. But it still gets people walking on it now and then. Whereas the Central and Victoria lines run along general purpose roads along with bicycles and pedestrians? The track is more accessible to the public than the DLR track. DLR train captains can drive the train manually from the control panel. I know. But most of the time they don't and so can be in with the passengers. Your point being? That although they are in with the passengers there doesn't seem to be a huge number of deaths on the DLR. Irrelevant. Dave. -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew P Smith" wrote in message
... In article , Dave Liney writes "Andrew P Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Dave Liney writes the off-peak time they could be in the main passenger areas and act as a reassuring presence. Wrong. Who is going to look out for obstructions on the track etc if they are in the 5th carriage..... Wrong? About what? They aren't going to be a reassuring presence? I think you'll find that they would be. Yes they would be a reassuring presence but I would much prefer to have the driver of the train driving it. I get nervous when I see the Captain of an aircraft walking back through the cabin for anything other than a wee wee (in the toilet that is - not the cabin!!!!!!) Yet this isn't a problem on the DLR. Which runs along purpose built track. But it still gets people walking on it now and then. Whereas the Central and Victoria lines run along general purpose roads along with bicycles and pedestrians? The track is more accessible to the public than the DLR track. DLR train captains can drive the train manually from the control panel. I know. But most of the time they don't and so can be in with the passengers. Your point being? That although they are in with the passengers there doesn't seem to be a huge number of deaths on the DLR. Irrelevant. DLR guards can now often be seen operating the doors, etc from the front panel, especially during busy times so that they can see the track ahead. Apparently they often get kids leaving things on the line in a deliberate attempt to derail trains. Daniel. -- email : heliomass (at) lykos (dot) co (dot) uk replace the 'k' with a 'c' in "lykos" |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew P Smith wrote the following in:
In article , Dave Liney writes Yet this isn't a problem on the DLR. Which runs along purpose built track. But it still gets people walking on it now and then. Whereas the Central and Victoria lines run along general purpose roads along with bicycles and pedestrians? The track is more accessible to the public than the DLR track. The whole of the Victoria line is in deep tube tunnels, apart from at the depot. I don't think it's possible for track to be less accessible to the public and there are certainly areas on the DLR where the track is more accessible to the public than that. So you are wrong. -- message by Robin May, but I would say that, wouldn't I? "GIVE IN! IT'S TIME TO GO!" - The NHS offers a high standard of care. "You MUST NOT drive dangerously" - the Highway Code Spelling lesson: then and than are different words. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Robin May
writes The whole of the Victoria line is in deep tube tunnels, apart from at the depot. I don't think it's possible for track to be less accessible to the public and there are certainly areas on the DLR where the track is more accessible to the public than that. So you are wrong. No I'm not. What is there to stop someone wandering off the platform and down a tunnel..... -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Roland Perry wrote: ps Is the Central automatic the whole length now? I thought it was only the middle section. I believe so, although I think one of the easterly sections is driven in manual mode at certain times to keep the drivers in practice. -- You dont have to be illiterate to use the Internet, but it help's. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Andrew P Smith wrote: What is there to stop someone wandering off the platform and down a tunnel..... The same thing that stops someone wandering off a platform and along the track at a DLR station? -- You dont have to be illiterate to use the Internet, but it help's. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DLR and Overground growth and future plans | London Transport | |||
London DLR and Overground growth and future plans | London Transport | |||
Oyster cards and one day travelcards. | London Transport | |||
I've been to London for business meetings and told myself that I'd be back to see London for myself. (rather than flying one day and out the next) I've used the tube briefly and my questions a | London Transport | |||
Oystercard and one day travelcards | London Transport |