Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From
https://www.cityam.com/mayor-of-london-election-sadiq-khan-pledges-to-name-london-overground-lines/ Sadiq Khan has pledged to give individual names to London Overground train lines if re-elected as mayor of London next month. Khan’s manifesto, released today, said the “London Overground network has grown considerably over recent years” and that “to reflect this I’ll launch a programme to name individual routes, giving each its own identity”. The London Overground now has 112 stations over six different lines, however none of the lines are named like on the London Underground. The policy announcement will see a programme launched by Khan to choose names for the six lines, if he wins re-election on 6 May, however no details were given on what the criteria will be. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 16:06:00 on Tue, 6 Apr 2021,
Recliner remarked: From https://www.cityam.com/mayor-of-lond...n-pledges-to-n ame-london-overground-lines/ Sadiq Khan has pledged to give individual names to London Overground train lines if re-elected as mayor of London next month. Khan’s manifesto, released today, said the “London Overground network has grown considerably over recent years” and that “to reflect this I’ll launch a programme to name individual routes, giving each its own identity”. The London Overground now has 112 stations over six different lines, however none of the lines are named like on the London Underground. The policy announcement will see a programme launched by Khan to choose names for the six lines, if he wins re-election on 6 May, however no details were given on what the criteria will be. If one isn't the "Wombling Line", then there's no justice in this world. -- Roland Perry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:06:00 on Tue, 6 Apr 2021, Recliner remarked: From https://www.cityam.com/mayor-of-lond...n-pledges-to-n ame-london-overground-lines/ Sadiq Khan has pledged to give individual names to London Overground train lines if re-elected as mayor of London next month. Khan’s manifesto, released today, said the “London Overground network has grown considerably over recent years” and that “to reflect this I’ll launch a programme to name individual routes, giving each its own identity”. The London Overground now has 112 stations over six different lines, however none of the lines are named like on the London Underground. The policy announcement will see a programme launched by Khan to choose names for the six lines, if he wins re-election on 6 May, however no details were given on what the criteria will be. If one isn't the "Wombling Line", then there's no justice in this world. Unfortunately, LO doesn't go anywhere near Wimbledon. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
From https://www.cityam.com/mayor-of-london-election-sadiq-khan-pledges-to-name-london-overground-lines/ Sadiq Khan has pledged to give individual names to London Overground train lines if re-elected as mayor of London next month. Khan’s manifesto, released today, said the “London Overground network has grown considerably over recent years” and that “to reflect this I’ll launch a programme to name individual routes, giving each its own identity”. The London Overground now has 112 stations over six different lines, however none of the lines are named like on the London Underground. The policy announcement will see a programme launched by Khan to choose names for the six lines, if he wins re-election on 6 May, however no details were given on what the criteria will be. Does the East London line even though services now go further still retain that name or has it been dropped, if it has been renewing it would seem logical. The Met only had exclusive use of it from the mid 1960’s till the Overground took over ,a comparatively short period in its long history when services like now went further. GH |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marland wrote:
Recliner wrote: From https://www.cityam.com/mayor-of-london-election-sadiq-khan-pledges-to-name-london-overground-lines/ Sadiq Khan has pledged to give individual names to London Overground train lines if re-elected as mayor of London next month. Khan’s manifesto, released today, said the “London Overground network has grown considerably over recent years” and that “to reflect this I’ll launch a programme to name individual routes, giving each its own identity”. The London Overground now has 112 stations over six different lines, however none of the lines are named like on the London Underground. The policy announcement will see a programme launched by Khan to choose names for the six lines, if he wins re-election on 6 May, however no details were given on what the criteria will be. Does the East London line even though services now go further still retain that name or has it been dropped, if it has been renewing it would seem logical. The Met only had exclusive use of it from the mid 1960’s till the Overground took over ,a comparatively short period in its long history when services like now went further. None of the LO services currently have official names, though of course locals might continue to use the historical names (DC Line, etc). The problem with some of the old geographic names is that multiple modern routes share some lines. For example, the physical East London line is used by routes to New Cross, West Croydon and Clapham Junction. Should these three routes warrent their own, different names? Or should they simply be regarded as three branches of the East London Line, just as the District Line has four western branches? But shouldn't the Clapham Junction route be called the South London Line? So you might have an East London Line with branches to New Cross and West Croydon, and the South London Line which shares part of the route, but then heads west to Clapham Junction. The old names also have oddities: the North London Line goes further west than the West London Line, and further east than the East London Line, while the East London Line to West Croydon goes further south than the South London Line. Net result: - the northern-most most LO branch isn't the North London Line - the eastern and western-most LO branches are on the North London Line - the southern-most branch is the East London line. A further complication is the possible confusion between the Northern LU line (which is the southern-most LU line) and the entirely separate North London LO line. Despite crossing each other, the Northern LU line has no single station interchanges with any LO line. Or you could invent Bakerloo-style composite names, but would the two entirely separate routes from H&I to Clapham Junction cause confusion? Other countries would just use route numbers, but that seems not to be our style. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/04/2021 23:39, Recliner wrote:
None of the LO services currently have official names, though of course locals might continue to use the historical names (DC Line, etc). The problem with some of the old geographic names is that multiple modern routes share some lines. I hope the Chingford Line and the Enfield Town/Cheshunt line get different names and colours on the map, because the latter calls at London Fields and Cambridge Heath and the former doesn't. I like Ermine Line for the Cheshunt line, because Liverpool Street, Stoke Newington, Bruce Grove, Edmonton Green and Theobalds Grove are all on the Roman road Ermine Street. But they'll probably go for George Floyd line instead. -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2002 - The Big Come Up - The Black Keys |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
On 06/04/2021 23:39, Recliner wrote: None of the LO services currently have official names, though of course locals might continue to use the historical names (DC Line, etc). The problem with some of the old geographic names is that multiple modern routes share some lines. I hope the Chingford Line and the Enfield Town/Cheshunt line get different names and colours on the map, because the latter calls at London Fields and Cambridge Heath and the former doesn't. I like Ermine Line for the Cheshunt line, because Liverpool Street, Stoke Newington, Bruce Grove, Edmonton Green and Theobalds Grove are all on the Roman road Ermine Street. But they'll probably go for George Floyd line instead. Whatever the names, I don't think they can get new colours. There just aren't enough distinct shades available. I wonder if they could use differently shaped dashed orange lines? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/04/2021 01:10, Recliner wrote:
Basil Jet wrote: On 06/04/2021 23:39, Recliner wrote: None of the LO services currently have official names, though of course locals might continue to use the historical names (DC Line, etc). The problem with some of the old geographic names is that multiple modern routes share some lines. I hope the Chingford Line and the Enfield Town/Cheshunt line get different names and colours on the map, because the latter calls at London Fields and Cambridge Heath and the former doesn't. I like Ermine Line for the Cheshunt line, because Liverpool Street, Stoke Newington, Bruce Grove, Edmonton Green and Theobalds Grove are all on the Roman road Ermine Street. But they'll probably go for George Floyd line instead. Whatever the names, I don't think they can get new colours. There just aren't enough distinct shades available. I wonder if they could use differently shaped dashed orange lines? They could use hollow lines, as currently used for the LO and DLR. The three DLR lines shown on https://tfl.gov.uk/maps/track/dlr should have names and colours on the main Tube map as well. -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2001 - Crow Sit On Blood Tree - Graham Coxon |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
On 07/04/2021 01:10, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 06/04/2021 23:39, Recliner wrote: None of the LO services currently have official names, though of course locals might continue to use the historical names (DC Line, etc). The problem with some of the old geographic names is that multiple modern routes share some lines. I hope the Chingford Line and the Enfield Town/Cheshunt line get different names and colours on the map, because the latter calls at London Fields and Cambridge Heath and the former doesn't. I like Ermine Line for the Cheshunt line, because Liverpool Street, Stoke Newington, Bruce Grove, Edmonton Green and Theobalds Grove are all on the Roman road Ermine Street. But they'll probably go for George Floyd line instead. Whatever the names, I don't think they can get new colours. There just aren't enough distinct shades available. I wonder if they could use differently shaped dashed orange lines? They could use hollow lines, as currently used for the LO and DLR. Yes, that could work. The three DLR lines shown on https://tfl.gov.uk/maps/track/dlr should have names and colours on the main Tube map as well. Are there only three DLR lines? Meanwhile, someone has suggested new names for the existing lines: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EyWytx_XAAIGWnB?format=jpg&name=large |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:44:48 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: The three DLR lines shown on https://tfl.gov.uk/maps/track/dlr should have names and colours on the main Tube map as well. Are there only three DLR lines? They're not really even lines, just routes with plenty of shared running. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Harrow and Wealdstone named London rail station of the year | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross fire (1987) : final victim named | London Transport | |||
1987 King's Cross fire victim named | London Transport |