Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. This would actually turn the LO into a tourist attraction, with people heading out to Romford just to see the Ladybird train. The I.O.W got there first. Such things date very quickly. https://www.flickr.com/photos/britis...0s/30918342656 GH |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote:
Basil Jet wrote: On 07/04/2021 22:13, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, and for nearly all of the LU stock to be liveried like the animals (apart from a few line-hopping spares in the current livery). ... So, the East London Line becomes "The Tiger" (no "line"), and the trains, bridges and map line have tiger appearance - the Chingford line becomes "The Giraffe", the Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. https://www.lothianbuses.com/news/2017/10/edinburgh-goes-wild-for-new-zoo-design-buses/ I know children who say things like “look, it’s the lemur bus!” Sam I wasn't suggesting the trains have pictures of animal faces or body shapes, but that the entire train be covered in zebra stripes etc. Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? Anglia have liveried trains for the Bittern line, East Suffolk line etc, but I've only ever seen them on the wrong lines! -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2004 - 18 Monkeys On A Dead Man's Chest - David Thomas & Two Pale Boys |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 09:24, Marland wrote:
Basil Jet wrote: My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. This would actually turn the LO into a tourist attraction, with people heading out to Romford just to see the Ladybird train. The I.O.W got there first. Such things date very quickly. https://www.flickr.com/photos/britis...0s/30918342656 They were tacky and childish. I don't think an entire train in giraffe patches would look bad. -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2004 - 18 Monkeys On A Dead Man's Chest - David Thomas & Two Pale Boys |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 07/04/2021 22:13, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, and for nearly all of the LU stock to be liveried like the animals (apart from a few line-hopping spares in the current livery). ... So, the East London Line becomes "The Tiger" (no "line"), and the trains, bridges and map line have tiger appearance - the Chingford line becomes "The Giraffe", the Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. https://www.lothianbuses.com/news/2017/10/edinburgh-goes-wild-for-new-zoo-design-buses/ I know children who say things like “look, it’s the lemur bus!” Sam I wasn't suggesting the trains have pictures of animal faces or body shapes, but that the entire train be covered in zebra stripes etc. Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. Anglia have liveried trains for the Bittern line, East Suffolk line etc, but I've only ever seen them on the wrong lines! You could argue that the smaller open access operators do exactly that! Sam -- The entity formerly known as Spit the dummy to reply |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG But at the end of the day, it comes down to how the LO diagrams are operated. Does each service have dedicated diagrams? Do Chingford and Enfield services share diagrams, for instance? -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2004 - 18 Monkeys On A Dead Man's Chest - David Thomas & Two Pale Boys |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 11:44:51 on Thu, 8 Apr 2021,
Basil Jet remarked: Anglia have liveried trains for the Bittern line, East Suffolk line etc, but I've only ever seen them on the wrong lines! Odd you should mention that... this morning one of the Fen Line GN trains was liveried "Gatwick Express". Which more different to the plain livery than the straying GA Stansted Express ones (which are at least the correct side of the river). EMR appear to gave given up re-liverying the ex Stagecoach 158's on the Liverpool-Norwich route - there's still only one that I see (and that mainly at weekends). Slightly OT: Stagecoach buses on the Cambridge-Ely routes (A10 direct, and via Newmarket) have for last year been a mixture of regular ones, and various separately-liveried Cambridge P&R. -- Roland Perry |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:56:46 +0100
Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 07/04/2021 22:13, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, and for nearly all of the LU stock to be liveried like the animals (apart from a few line-hopping spares in the current livery). ... So, the East London Line becomes "The Tiger" (no "line"), and the trains, bridges and map line have tiger appearance - the Chingford line becomes "The Giraffe", the Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. https://www.lothianbuses.com/news/2017/10/edinburgh-goes-wild-for-new-zoo-design-buses/ I know children who say things like “look, it’s the lemur bus!” Sam I wasn't suggesting the trains have pictures of animal faces or body shapes, but that the entire train be covered in zebra stripes etc. Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. Reading buses go in for different liveries for different routes. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 18:07, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 08/04/2021 15:53, wrote: On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:56:46 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. Quite a lot do it though. Here's a Brighton one... -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2015 - Daylight Versions - The Leaf Library |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Harrow and Wealdstone named London rail station of the year | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross fire (1987) : final victim named | London Transport | |||
1987 King's Cross fire victim named | London Transport |