Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
... Reading buses go in for different liveries for different routes. Some said that at one time the York Park&Ride buses used have different liveries for the different routes, depending on which P&R car-park they went to/from. But by the time I used them, they were a standard livery - the same as the non-P&R buses (*) - and distinguished only by the LED display with the number and the route name (I think it alternated between the colour-name of the route and the name of the car-park). What is always amusing is if a bus company has temporarily borrowed a few buses from another company: there's something a bit weird getting on a bus in York which has bus-company or place-of-interest adverts for Sheffield or Leeds. I think the furthest afield was one that was from the Exeter area. That's a hell of a long way to transport a bus that you've borrowed ;-) (*) It's a shame there wasn't a different livery that was common for all P&R buses (irrespective of route) so you could distinguish "your" bus from other routes that happened to use the same bus-stop in town. It would everyone standing up in anticipation, only to realise that it's the wrong bus as it gets close enough to read the LED sign. |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Basil Jet" wrote in message
... I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. Quite a lot do it though. Here's a Brighton one... That's fair enough. The buses that do long-distance routes (the Leeds-York-Malton-Scarborough/Whitby "Coastliner" is the one near me) tend to be higher spec and more powerful for going further and faster, and getting up hills (Whitwell Hill is the killer for buses on the A64), so they have a dedicated fleet with specific livery. But the livery doesn't go down to the level of separate paint jobs depending on whether the bus goes to Whitby or Scarborough after Malton :-) The Number 36 Ripon-Harrogate-Leeds buses are a specific livery with those destinations painted on the side - but that's a fast and frequent service with little extras like USB charging points and wifi (introduced long before it became common even on local buses). (By rights, that bus should be the reinstated Ripon railway service, but the 36 bus is so good that trains could probably not compete on price, and *maybe* not on journey time, so the line will probably never be re-opened now.) |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graeme Wall wrote:
On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. Reading buses go in for different liveries for different routes. That was used by some Edwardian Tram operators as in the 1900’s people were less literate than they are now, Glasgow was one of the larger operators to use the method and augmented the livery by having an appropriates coloured lamp shining forward which you probably could not do on a bus due to C+U regulations ruling out Red shining forward. The system ceased to be used from 1938. On such a large Network there had to be duplication. Someone has patiently created a LU style map of the routes. https://www.flickr.com/photos/kaputniq/46734214652/ The use of the number within the livery seems quite widespread where an operator runs a route it wishes to set apart from the tour around the suburbs operations such as the various X for express services around the country, sometimes with a line map of the stops served. Occasionally they have a really dedicated colour livery as well ,Stagecoach favour Gold for many such services. First operate some routes with a dedicated route livery such as between Poole and Exeter with scenic X53 Jurassic Coast service., this year they are delivering new vehicles to the service in a dedicated livery so they must still see some merit in such branding. https://twitter.com/firstdorset/stat...63208940793856 First pulled out of much of Devon a few years ago now leaving StageCoach to resurrect some routes. This meant that fast bus service between Exeter and Bude which was deliberately branded as the Atlantic Coast Express in homage to the train of that name parts of which ran that way lost the name. https://www.focustransport.org/2012/...rth-devon.html Are there any other bus services that use or used a former train service name. GH |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. Stagecoach do that a lot (at least in some areas). At weekends it's common to see buses on the wrong routes. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 21:35:31 +0100, "NY" wrote:
"Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... Reading buses go in for different liveries for different routes. Some said that at one time the York Park&Ride buses used have different liveries for the different routes, depending on which P&R car-park they went to/from. But by the time I used them, they were a standard livery - the same as the non-P&R buses (*) - and distinguished only by the LED display with the number and the route name (I think it alternated between the colour-name of the route and the name of the car-park). What is always amusing is if a bus company has temporarily borrowed a few buses from another company: there's something a bit weird getting on a bus in York which has bus-company or place-of-interest adverts for Sheffield or Leeds. I think the furthest afield was one that was from the Exeter area. That's a hell of a long way to transport a bus that you've borrowed ;-) When I lived im Manchester, we had Pacers which were withrawn from Cornwall because the curves were too tigh. These still had Cornish ads and wers till painted chocolate and cream )their only redeeming feature). We also had ex- Glasgoe Class 303 units, still painted in Strathclyde livery, with Glasgow adverts and maps. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NY wrote:
"Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... Reading buses go in for different liveries for different routes. Some said that at one time the York Park&Ride buses used have different liveries for the different routes, depending on which P&R car-park they went to/from. But by the time I used them, they were a standard livery - the same as the non-P&R buses (*) - and distinguished only by the LED display with the number and the route name (I think it alternated between the colour-name of the route and the name of the car-park). What is always amusing is if a bus company has temporarily borrowed a few buses from another company: there's something a bit weird getting on a bus in York which has bus-company or place-of-interest adverts for Sheffield or Leeds. I think the furthest afield was one that was from the Exeter area. That's a hell of a long way to transport a bus that you've borrowed ;-) Quite a long time ago now after the break up and privatisation of the National Bus Company one of the smaller operations created was the North Devon operation branded as Red Bus, an unusual colour for the area which had long been a bastion of Southern and Western National green. Till they were repainted the buses as well as having the name Red Bus applied on a white patch carried labels stating “This is now a Red Bus” which at least gave the new operation a little publicity in the area, however sometime later I saw one of the vehicles still in green either transferred or loaned to Hampshire bus on an Andover to Basingstoke service still carrying adverts for Devon businesses and also the “This is now a Red Bus” stickers. Gawd knows many stereotype opinions of people in the Southwest being country bumpkins were reinforced in observers. Going further back than I can remember during WW2 Bournemouth Corporation Trolleybuses were loaned to London Transport and their Primrose Yellow livery must have made quite a contrast to the usual in Ilford where they were based as with less seats than London Trolleys that area was quieter. They returned home when a batch of trolleys destined for South Africa were allocated to London , this required a change in UK construction and rules as they were 6 inches wider than and heavier than what was allowed on UK buses at the time they also went to Ilford as it was felt the streets were generally wider than those of central London , The change was permanent and post war buses were wider than their older brethren so drivers soon had to cope everywhere. The South Africans got a new batch postwar and London held onto the originals,they were regarded as quite luxurious as they retained tinted and opening windows for a climate they never saw though once it was obvious they were never going the front entrance doors temporarily covered were removed fully. The South African design influenced the Londons last batch of Trolleys post war the Q1 model which apart from minor details was also used by Glasgow and Newcastle. GH |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:56:46 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. And yet it's not uncommon. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graeme Wall wrote:
On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 07/04/2021 22:13, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, and for nearly all of the LU stock to be liveried like the animals (apart from a few line-hopping spares in the current livery). ... So, the East London Line becomes "The Tiger" (no "line"), and the trains, bridges and map line have tiger appearance - the Chingford line becomes "The Giraffe", the Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. https://www.lothianbuses.com/news/2017/10/edinburgh-goes-wild-for-new-zoo-design-buses/ I know children who say things like “look, it’s the lemur bus!” Sam I wasn't suggesting the trains have pictures of animal faces or body shapes, but that the entire train be covered in zebra stripes etc. Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. Reading buses go in for different liveries for different routes. As do First in Bristol, though some are shared between routes which have significant sections in common (eg 1/2 and 3/4). More recently they've changed some route liveries to be more generic 'north/south of city routes'. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/04/2021 06:15, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote:
Graeme Wall wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 07/04/2021 22:13, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, and for nearly all of the LU stock to be liveried like the animals (apart from a few line-hopping spares in the current livery). ... So, the East London Line becomes "The Tiger" (no "line"), and the trains, bridges and map line have tiger appearance - the Chingford line becomes "The Giraffe", the Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. https://www.lothianbuses.com/news/2017/10/edinburgh-goes-wild-for-new-zoo-design-buses/ I know children who say things like “look, it’s the lemur bus!” Sam I wasn't suggesting the trains have pictures of animal faces or body shapes, but that the entire train be covered in zebra stripes etc. Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. Reading buses go in for different liveries for different routes. As do First in Bristol, though some are shared between routes which have significant sections in common (eg 1/2 and 3/4). More recently they've changed some route liveries to be more generic 'north/south of city routes'. The classic use of different colours for different routes is in Buenos Aires where each of over 100 different routes has its own colour scheme. Originally the buses were all operated by owner-drivers and each driver belonged to a cooperative that had the licence to operate one route. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, and for nearly all of the LU stock to be liveried like the animals (apart from a few line-hopping spares in the current livery). An unrecognised asset pretty much unique to LO is loads of bridges in prominent locations like Camden and Shoreditch, and these could also be liveried like the trains. The livery would also appear in simplified form on the tube map line. So, the East London Line becomes "The Tiger" (no "line"), and the trains, bridges and map line have tiger appearance - the Chingford line becomes "The Giraffe", the Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. This would actually turn the LO into a tourist attraction, with people heading out to Romford just to see the Ladybird train. That's the kind of thing a Japanese private or third sector branch line might do! Anna Noyd-Dryver |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Harrow and Wealdstone named London rail station of the year | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross fire (1987) : final victim named | London Transport | |||
1987 King's Cross fire victim named | London Transport |