![]() |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
Would it not be easier to have the same rule as in the USA, where they can
turn right on a red signal? So we should be able to turn LEFT at a RED light. Of course the pedestrians and other cars on the green, have priority. This would save time, reduce pollution (whilst waiting) and get traffic moving, instead of sitting idle. What does London say ? |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
"Rajesh Kakad (BT)" wrote in message
... Would it not be easier to have the same rule as in the USA, where they can turn right on a red signal? So we should be able to turn LEFT at a RED light. Of course the pedestrians and other cars on the green, have priority. This would save time, reduce pollution (whilst waiting) and get traffic moving, instead of sitting idle. What does London say ? Some might say that a certain newt-collecting person who holds a mayoral post in London might actually *want* the traffic to remain stationary for longer so as to deter people from driving in London ;-) In general I'd say that a turn-left-on-red rule would probably work quite well. But to be effective, it would require a separate lane for left-turners - otherwise the person in front of you who wants to go straight on would prevent you getting past him to turn left. It would need a massive programme of re-education, not just of drivers but also of pedestrians and cyclists. Maybe it should only apply to junctions with a left filter, where the left lane sees one of two aspects: flashing amber (while straight ahead traffic has red, to warn you that you must still give way to traffic from your right and to pedestrians) and green (in sync with the green lights for straight-ahead traffic). Possibly more urgent is to upgrade traffic lights to have a phase for right-turning traffic: I've sat for ages at lights which only let one vehicle turn right for each cycle of the lights because there is an infinitesimally small time between the lights turning green to let you onto the junction and the oncoming traffic starting to move, blocking your right turn. I remember that there was a set of lights like this near Feltham, on the route that the Heathrow Airport to Feltham Station bus used: it would have been quicker to have got off the bus as it first stopped in the queue and walked the last few hundred yards to the station :-( |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
Rajesh Kakad (BT) wrote:
Would it not be easier to have the same rule as in the USA, where they can turn right on a red signal? So we should be able to turn LEFT at a RED light. Of course the pedestrians and other cars on the green, have priority. This would save time, reduce pollution (whilst waiting) and get traffic moving, instead of sitting idle. What does London say ? Even if there is a separate lane for left-turning traffic, which often there isn't room for in London, a left-turning driver would have poor visibility of conflicting traffic if a bus or truck is waiting in the adjacent lane at the lights. As a way of improving junction capacity, I prefer the French system (Parisian, anyway) of giving pedestrians priority over turning vehicles. At a cross-roads where north-south and east-west roads meet, when north-south traffic has green signals, the 'green man' is displayed for pedestrians crossing the east-west roads, and traffic turning into those roads has to give way to them. I'm sure the HSE would have a fit, but it does seem to work. The great advantage is that there is no need to halt all traffic for a pedestrian-only phase. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
On Fri, 28 May 2004 13:45:43 +0000 (UTC), Rajesh Kakad (BT)
wrote: Would it not be easier to have the same rule as in the USA, where they can turn right on a red signal? So we should be able to turn LEFT at a RED light. Of course the pedestrians and other cars on the green, have priority. This would save time, reduce pollution (whilst waiting) and get traffic moving, instead of sitting idle. What does London say ? Whilst we at it can we have flashing Amber traffic lights meaning give way on traffic lights that are not as important during late evening and early morning? Like they do in Italy How many times have you sat at a red light and nothing has passed through before the light has gone green again? also switch off pelican crossings after say 00.30 as people have a habit of pressing the button as the pass them not intending to cross anymore ideas? -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
also switch off pelican crossings after say 00.30 as people have a habit of pressing the button as the pass them not intending to cross anymore ideas? In the USA they often turnoff traffic lights at night. When off one direction flashes yellow - that's the major road. The other direction flashes red - flashing red means the same as a "stop" sign. Jeremy Parker |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
"gs" wrote in message
... On Fri, 28 May 2004 13:45:43 +0000 (UTC), Rajesh Kakad (BT) wrote: Would it not be easier to have the same rule as in the USA, where they can turn right on a red signal? So we should be able to turn LEFT at a RED light. Of course the pedestrians and other cars on the green, have priority. This would save time, reduce pollution (whilst waiting) and get traffic moving, instead of sitting idle. What does London say ? Whilst we at it can we have flashing Amber traffic lights meaning give way on traffic lights that are not as important during late evening and early morning? Like they do in Italy How many times have you sat at a red light and nothing has passed through before the light has gone green again? also switch off pelican crossings after say 00.30 as people have a habit of pressing the button as the pass them not intending to cross anymore ideas? -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ FWIW, here in the States there was quite a controversy when the idea was first floated for Right Turn on Red. The nay-sayers complained of the hundreds of thousands of pedestrians that would perish. There was, in fact, quite a learning curve (no pun intended) and there were some tragic crashes at first, but all-in-all it seems to work just fine now. As for a dedicated right turn lane (left in the UK), while we do have some, the bulk of intersections have none. Therefore if car #1 goes straight and car #2 wants to turn, car #2 waits for the traffic signal to change. What would really help here in the USA is British style roundabouts. I love driving in your country because the roundabouts at least keep traffic somewhat flowing as opposed to what someone else in this thread said about waiting for signals to change when not a cross traffic or pedestrian is in sight. BTW, if we want to turn left (in the USA) on to a one-way street that only goes to the left and we are also on a one-way street, we can legally turn left. Rich |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
In article , Jeremy Parker
writes also switch off pelican crossings after say 00.30 as people have a habit of pressing the button as the pass them not intending to cross anymore ideas? In the USA they often turnoff traffic lights at night. When off one direction flashes yellow - that's the major road. The other direction flashes red - flashing red means the same as a "stop" sign. Jeremy Parker Also done in some areas of Switzerland. In Eastern Germany, at certain sets of lights, a sign exists permitting you to turn right when the light is at red if the road is clear of other traffic. Seems to work OK - it's a hang over from the days of Communist East Germany. -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
Andrew Smith writes:
In Eastern Germany, at certain sets of lights, a sign exists permitting you to turn right when the light is at red if the road is clear of other traffic. ... A textual sign, or graphical? I find it hard to imagine the icon for that. In the US, intersections where you must *not* turn right on red (except in New York, where by municipal law the default is reversed) are marked with textual signs, NO TURN ON RED or similar wording. We used to have the same here, but now a no-right-turn icon is placed beside an icon of a traffic light with the red lit, and you're supposed to figure out for yourself that a preposition or conjunction connecting the two signs is implied. By the way, for those who have never experienced it, the North American right-on-red does require the driver to stop first, and wait for all conflicting traffic. In other words, here a red light is equivalent to a stop sign if you're making a right turn. (And dishonored about as much.) -- Mark Brader, Toronto | Keep out of eyes--if this occurs, rinse with water. | (Directions seen on shampoo bottle) My text in this article is in the public domain. |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
"Rich":
BTW, if we want to turn left (in the USA) on to a one-way street that only goes to the left and we are also on a one-way street, we can legally turn left. He means on red, of course. Otherwise it wouldn't be interesting. That is the usual rule in North America, but there is some variation between states and provinces. A few don't allow this, while a few allow left-on-red as long as you're turning *into* a one-way street (left and right turns into the same street would go into different lanes unless the one-way street was too narrow, so there's no conflict with converging traffic); or as long as you're turning *from* a one-way street. See e.g. http://www.geocities.com/jusjih/signals.html. -- Mark Brader, Toronto cat/dev/null got your tongue? -- Jutta Degener My text in this article is in the public domain. |
Reduce Traffic - Turn left on a RED
"Jeremy Parker" wrote in message
... In the USA they often turnoff traffic lights at night. When off one direction flashes yellow - that's the major road. The other direction flashes red - flashing red means the same as a "stop" sign. So what's the difference between a flashing yellow and a solid green? Incidentally, since the average life span of a traffic light bulb here is about none months, I would imagine that the life of these flashing bulbs must be a few weeks, unless they always use LEDs in them. BTW, has anyone else noticed that dead traffic light bulbs have become very common recently in London? -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk