Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why are bendy-buses not double-decker?
tom -- build the roof with holes in |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 at 17:49:53, Tom Anderson
wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Because wheelchair users can't climb stairs. -- Annabel Smyth http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html Website updated 6 June 2004 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Annabel Smyth" wrote in message ... On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 at 17:49:53, Tom Anderson wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Because wheelchair users can't climb stairs. Annabel Smyth Surely they could be accomodated on the lower deck ? Cheerz, Baz |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Because Bendy-Buses can accommodate more people plus allow for faster loading with 3 doors instead of 1 for Entry/1 for Exit. -- To reply direct, remove NOSPAM and replace with railwaysonline For railway information, news and photos see http://www.railways-online.co.uk |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Joe wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Incidentally, i am not the first person to think of this: http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Two-i...Decker_20Buses The EU document linked to at the end contains a definition of the term 'double-decker articulated bus or coach', which suggests that these things either exist or are likely to exist (or that EU lawmakers have too much time on their hands). Because Bendy-Buses can accommodate more people Hang on - how does a single-decker bendy accommodate more people than a double-decker bendy? I'd have thought the double-decker version would accomodate roughly twice as many! plus allow for faster loading with 3 doors instead of 1 for Entry/1 for Exit. Why couldn't a double-decker bendy have three doors, like a single-decker? And why didn't TfL get the four-door Citaro G? tom -- I DO IT WRONG!!! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote the following in:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Joe wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Incidentally, i am not the first person to think of this: I'd thought of it too. And also, the bus in the film "The Big Bus" is a double decker bendy bus (and nuclear powered too!). http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074205/ Because Bendy-Buses can accommodate more people Hang on - how does a single-decker bendy accommodate more people than a double-decker bendy? I'd have thought the double-decker version would accomodate roughly twice as many! I think everyone who has replied has interpreted what you said as meaning "Why not use double deckers instead of bendy buses?". The idea of a double decker bendy bus obviously seems quite strange! Personally, I'd like to see one, although whether I'd like to travel in it is another matter! -- message by Robin May-Silk and his close friend, Robert Kilroy-Kotton "GIVE IN! IT'S TIME TO GO!" - The NHS offers a high standard of care. Would you take the office of relief?: http://robinmay.fotopic.net/p4600200.html |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:49:53 +0100, Tom Anderson
wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Because the passengers on the top deck would get barbequed every other month? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marc Brett" wrote in message
... On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:49:53 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Because the passengers on the top deck would get barbequed every other month? You couldn't have a continuous floor upstairs, but I don't see why the front half and the back half couldn't have self-contained upstairs sections. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote in
message "Marc Brett" wrote in message ... On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:49:53 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Because the passengers on the top deck would get barbequed every other month? You couldn't have a continuous floor upstairs, but I don't see why the front half and the back half couldn't have self-contained upstairs sections. Wouldn't it waste space to have two sets of stairs? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , John Rowland
writes "Marc Brett" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:49:53 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: Why are bendy-buses not double-decker? Because the passengers on the top deck would get barbequed every other month? You couldn't have a continuous floor upstairs, but I don't see why the front half and the back half couldn't have self-contained upstairs sections. I presume that the simple answer is that double-deckers are big, lumbering and difficult to manoeuvre, bendy-buses are long, bendy and difficult to manoeuvre, so combining the two would be a recipe for trouble. -- Spyke Address is valid, but messages are treated as junk. The opinions I express do not necessarily reflect those of the educational institution from which I post. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|