On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:28:44 +0100, "John Rowland"
wrote:


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3895769.stm

Personally, I've never found the Victoria line as bad as Bank Central Line.

I use the Vic most nights and the bit north of Stockwell _is_ pretty
horrendous.
--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War:
http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm
625-Online - classic British television:
http://www.625.org.uk
'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic:
http://www.thingstocome.org.uk

"John Rowland" wrote in message ...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3895769.stm

Personally, I've never found the Victoria line as bad as Bank Central
Line.

Going OT a little, WAGN between Hitchin and Royston is pretty bad for
the fast mainline routes, though it's a comparatively short stretch
involved.

(Nick Cooper) wrote in message ...
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:28:44 +0100, "John Rowland"
wrote:


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3895769.stm

Personally, I've never found the Victoria line as bad as Bank Central Line.

I use the Vic most nights and the bit north of Stockwell _is_ pretty
horrendous.

Theres a pretty nasty bit between kings cross and highbury too. I wonder if it
has anything to do with them using concrete sleepers instead of woodern ones
(in the sense of them amplifying vibration instead of absorbing it)?

B2003