Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#102
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On 8 Sep 2004 08:52:29 -0700, (Boltar) wrote: And a modern double decker weights 11 or 12 tons. You have to wonder where that extra 3 or 4 tons of flab was needed. Length, width, height, interior trim and glass. A modern decker is *substantially* larger in all dimensions than a Routemaster. But the 1970s/80s generation of high-floor double-deckers were only around the 10 ton mark, and they're not much smaller than modern low-floor deckers. And no way were they as much as 25% bigger in area than RMLs - 12% longer, 4% wider (and no taller). Obvious conclusion: lots of extra metal needed to put the engine at the back, lots more again to make low-floor buses strong enough, and enormous amounts to keep a bendi-bus rigid and flexible in the right places. Colin McKenzie -- The great advantage of not trusting statistics is that it leaves you free to believe the damned lies instead! |
#103
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Colin McKenzie ) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying : Obvious conclusion: lots of extra metal needed to put the engine at the back, lots more again to make low-floor buses strong enough, and enormous amounts to keep a bendi-bus rigid and flexible in the right places. I wonder how heavy the Bendibuses that Sheffield used in the 80s were? |
#104
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Sep 2004 20:07:28 GMT, Adrian
wrote: I wonder how heavy the Bendibuses that Sheffield used in the 80s were? Or, indeed (to compare like for like), the old high-floor Mercedes O405 derivative bendies occasionally found in Germany. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To e-mail use neil at the above domain |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Routemaster lament | London Transport | |||
Routemaster lament | London Transport | |||
Routemaster lament | London Transport | |||
Routemaster lament | London Transport | |||
A Commuter's Lament | London Transport |