I've received two emails from Paul.Riddler
(Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)

Both were CC'd to Phil Backhouse (Phil.Backhouse/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)

One was sent on August 25th, the other today (September 3rd).

Now the strange bit - neither email had any message, although both had
the standard LUL multi-line disclaimer at the bottom.

Does anybody know if these people exist, or is somebody just rattling my
cage?

If anybody has received a genuine email from LUL recently and can do a
comparison, the second email's headers are thus:

=================================================


Return-Path: Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
Delivered-To:
Received: (qmail 76243 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 16:26:37 -0000
Received: from bmx2.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.131]) (envelope-
sender Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)
by nectarine.mail.uk.easynet.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for ; 3 Sep 2004 16:26:37 -0000
Received: from lulmail16.lul.co.uk ([212.133.22.3]
helo=luldmzmms16.lul.co.uk)
by bmx2.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1C3GtA-00066P-Uj
for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:26:13 +0100
Received: from LUL0X016MMS0001.lu.tfl.local (unverified) by
luldmzmms16.lul.co.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.10) with ESMTP id
for ;
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:26:07 +0100
Received: from lul0x022exc0005.lul.co.uk (unverified) by
LUL0X016MMS0001.lu.tfl.local
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.10) with ESMTP id
al for
;
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:20:42 +0100
Received: by lul0x022exc0005.lul.co.uk with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2655.55)
id QYSB5DBT; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:27:31 +0100
Message-ID:
FF5FCE576AF0D311826D0008C7735CBD04EE162F@lul0x022 exc0006.lul.co.uk
From: Riddler Paul Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
To: '"
Cc: Backhouse Phil Phil.Backhouse/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
Subject: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:27:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55)
Content-Type: text/plain

=================================================

I have obscured my address with and other addresses
with '/AT/' to prevent harvesting.

They *seem* valid headers


"Peter Wright" Overground wrote in message
...
I've received two emails from Paul.Riddler
(Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)

Both were CC'd to Phil Backhouse (Phil.Backhouse/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)

One was sent on August 25th, the other today (September 3rd).

Now the strange bit - neither email had any message, although both had
the standard LUL multi-line disclaimer at the bottom.

Does anybody know if these people exist, or is somebody just rattling my
cage?

If anybody has received a genuine email from LUL recently and can do a
comparison, the second email's headers are thus:

=================================================


Return-Path: Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
Delivered-To:
Received: (qmail 76243 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 16:26:37 -0000
Received: from bmx2.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.131]) (envelope-
sender Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)
by nectarine.mail.uk.easynet.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for ; 3 Sep 2004 16:26:37 -0000
Received: from lulmail16.lul.co.uk ([212.133.22.3]
helo=luldmzmms16.lul.co.uk)
by bmx2.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1C3GtA-00066P-Uj
for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:26:13 +0100
Received: from LUL0X016MMS0001.lu.tfl.local (unverified) by
luldmzmms16.lul.co.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.10) with ESMTP id
for ;
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:26:07 +0100
Received: from lul0x022exc0005.lul.co.uk (unverified) by
LUL0X016MMS0001.lu.tfl.local
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.10) with ESMTP id
al for
;
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:20:42 +0100
Received: by lul0x022exc0005.lul.co.uk with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2655.55)
id QYSB5DBT; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:27:31 +0100
Message-ID:
FF5FCE576AF0D311826D0008C7735CBD04EE162F@lul0x022 exc0006.lul.co.uk
From: Riddler Paul Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
To: '"
Cc: Backhouse Phil Phil.Backhouse/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
Subject: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:27:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55)
Content-Type: text/plain

=================================================

I have obscured my address with and other addresses
with '/AT/' to prevent harvesting.

The "from" format looks exactly the same as when I sent e-mails to my
home address from work. I haven't checked the rest out in detail. I've
copied your post to my work e-mail and when I next go in I'll check the LU
address book for those two names to confirm if they exist.

It may have been a hiccup in the system - they're currently changing
everyone over to XP at the moment.

Roger

In article ,
Overground (Peter Wright) wrote:

I've received two emails from Paul.Riddler
(Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)

Both were CC'd to Phil Backhouse (Phil.Backhouse/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)

One was sent on August 25th, the other today (September 3rd).

Now the strange bit - neither email had any message, although both had
the standard LUL multi-line disclaimer at the bottom.

Does anybody know if these people exist, or is somebody just rattling
my cage?

If anybody has received a genuine email from LUL recently and can do a
comparison, the second email's headers are thus:

=================================================


Return-Path: Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
Delivered-To:
Received: (qmail 76243 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 16:26:37 -0000
Received: from bmx2.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.6.131]) (envelope-
sender Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)
by nectarine.mail.uk.easynet.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for ; 3 Sep 2004 16:26:37 -0000
Received: from lulmail16.lul.co.uk ([212.133.22.3]
helo=luldmzmms16.lul.co.uk)
by bmx2.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1C3GtA-00066P-Uj
for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:26:13 +0100
Received: from LUL0X016MMS0001.lu.tfl.local (unverified) by
luldmzmms16.lul.co.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.10) with ESMTP id
for
;
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:26:07 +0100
Received: from lul0x022exc0005.lul.co.uk (unverified) by
LUL0X016MMS0001.lu.tfl.local
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.10) with ESMTP id
al for
;
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:20:42 +0100
Received: by lul0x022exc0005.lul.co.uk with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2655.55)
id QYSB5DBT; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:27:31 +0100
Message-ID:
FF5FCE576AF0D311826D0008C7735CBD04EE162F@lul0x022 exc0006.lul.co.uk
From: Riddler Paul Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
To: '"
Cc: Backhouse Phil Phil.Backhouse/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk
Subject: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:27:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55)
Content-Type: text/plain

=================================================

I have obscured my address with and other addresses
with '/AT/' to prevent harvesting.

In article ,
Overground (Peter Wright) wrote:

I've received two emails from Paul.Riddler
(Paul.Riddler/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)

Both were CC'd to Phil Backhouse (Phil.Backhouse/AT/tube.tfl.gov.uk)

One was sent on August 25th, the other today (September 3rd).

Now the strange bit - neither email had any message, although both had
the standard LUL multi-line disclaimer at the bottom.

Does anybody know if these people exist, or is somebody just rattling
my cage?

If anybody has received a genuine email from LUL recently and can do a
comparison, the second email's headers are thus:


I checked the internal address book yesterday and both people exist with
the address shown.

Roger

wrote in :

I checked the internal address book yesterday and both people exist with
the address shown.

Roger

Many thanks for making the effort.