![]() |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane
rules all over even small parts of London. On the same road it is quite easy to move from a permanent 24hr bus lane to a Monday-Friday (7:30-10:00 and 16:00-19:00) part time lane and then turn the corner into a Monday-Saturday 8:00-18:00) lane and various versions and mutations thereof. To compound this, many times you pop out of a side road across a bus lane which doesn't have a sign for another couple of hundred yards and can easily do all the wrong things. There are a few problems with this as I see it. 1. Roads are not used efficiently by drivers when bus lanes are not operational leading to undertaking by those who know or outside lane crawling by those who don't. 2. The potential to be caught out on the same road having read the first sign (part time) and then run along that bus lane correctly only to be caught out when in goes permanent. 3. Complicated signs which are impossible to read at even nominal speeds, let along 30mph because you are past them before you got to the bit that relates to you and your time. 4. All that thought processing (am I legal/not legal/what's the time/day?) distracts the driver from what he should be doing - driving safely. Is it not possible to simply call the bus lanes either full time or part time and have full times ones painted red and part times ones painted green and have only one possible part time option? I know that this will not be 100% suitable for 100% of the roads 100% of the time but I can't believe that the current system is either. It drives me mad, and I'm sure one day it will drive ne to a big fat inadvertant penalty notice. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
"Buttoneer" wrote in message
om... I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. On the same road it is quite easy to move from a permanent 24hr bus lane to a Monday-Friday (7:30-10:00 and 16:00-19:00) part time lane and then turn the corner into a Monday-Saturday 8:00-18:00) lane and various versions and mutations thereof. To compound this, many times you pop out of a side road across a bus lane which doesn't have a sign for another couple of hundred yards and can easily do all the wrong things. There are a few problems with this as I see it. 1. Roads are not used efficiently by drivers when bus lanes are not operational leading to undertaking by those who know or outside lane crawling by those who don't. 2. The potential to be caught out on the same road having read the first sign (part time) and then run along that bus lane correctly only to be caught out when in goes permanent. 3. Complicated signs which are impossible to read at even nominal speeds, let along 30mph because you are past them before you got to the bit that relates to you and your time. 4. All that thought processing (am I legal/not legal/what's the time/day?) distracts the driver from what he should be doing - driving safely. Is it not possible to simply call the bus lanes either full time or part time and have full times ones painted red and part times ones painted green and have only one possible part time option? A very good idea to distinguish full-time and part-time bus lanes by the colour of the road surface: nice and clear and unambiguous. I'd like to see the same applied to parking restrictions: to distinguish between public spaces ("anyone may park here for all or part of the day") and residents-only spaces ("unless you have a permit you may not park here at any time"). I got a ticket because there were numerous bays of parking spaces along a road near Magdalin Bridge in Oxford; most of these were public spaces with a one-hour limit, but a few here and there were for residents only. The only way to distinguish between them was the plate-on-a-pole. IF only the residents' bays had been marked with a different coloured surface and "Residents Only" road markings. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
In article , Buttoneer
writes I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. On the same road it is quite easy to move from a permanent 24hr bus lane to a Monday-Friday (7:30-10:00 and 16:00-19:00) part time lane and then turn the corner into a Monday-Saturday 8:00-18:00) lane and various versions and mutations thereof. Watch out also for signs saying Mon-Sun. Can be very deceptive (probably deliberate). -- Thoss |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
In article ,
Buttoneer wrote: Is it not possible to simply call the bus lanes either full time or part time and have full times ones painted red and part times ones painted green and have only one possible part time option? You can't do the latter because some are tidal and others weekdays only or Mon-Sat. What we really need - though the cost would probably be too high - is red runway-style lights demarcating bus lanes which are turned on when they are operational. -- Tony Bryer |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
|
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
"Marc Brett" wrote in message
... On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. What's the problem with making them all 24/7? Seriously. When traffic is heavy, the buses get a lane to themselves, as it should be. When traffic is light, there's no need for cars to use the extra lane anyway. And, of course, it ends the confusion of when it is or is not a bus lane. This would not work anywhere you have a business - you can ban loading for part of the day but not all of it. Otherwise you'll drive them out of business. And you can't allow loading all the time - otherwise there is no point having a bus lane in the first place. Different rules are needed to suit each location bit I agree clearer signagge is often needed. I don't think coloured surfacing would be a good method of indicating times - there are too many variations. Clear bus-lane signs at the start of the lane, and repeated at intervals is the answer - but so many lanes just have a sign at the beginning of the lane and not enough repeaters. Incidentally, if there are no days or hours shown at the start of a bus lane this means it is 'at any time'. However, I think putting 'at any time' on the sign is clearer! The same is NOT true for permit-parking signs. The hours of operation may be (and all too often are) omitted from the plates in CPZ parking bays and only have to be shown on the boundary signs at the entry points to the CPZ. I think the operational hours should be shown on all plates in all parking bays - as they are on all the schemes I have designed. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
"Marc Brett" wrote in message
... On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. What's the problem with making them all 24/7? The problem is that one is not currently allowed to use bus lanes for undertaking a car waiting to turn right. The other problem is that I can get around very quickly because I use bus lanes to undertake all the clowns who avoid them 24/7, and I couldn't do that if they were operational 24/7. What's the problem with people just staying out of bus lanes unless they've read the sign and checked the hours? Why do you see a 24/7 ban as an improvement, when no-one materially benefits from that? Why don't you just learn how to read instead of trying to punish people who can read? -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
"umpston" wrote in
: This would not work anywhere you have a business - you can ban loading for part of the day but not all of it. Otherwise you'll drive them out of business. And you can't allow loading all the time - otherwise there is no point having a bus lane in the first place. How about making the bus lane 24 by 7 for flowing traffic, but allow loading for specified times of the day. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
"Andrew Black (delete obvious bit)" wrote in
message ... "umpston" wrote in : This would not work anywhere you have a business - you can ban loading for part of the day but not all of it. Otherwise you'll drive them out of business. And you can't allow loading all the time - otherwise there is no point having a bus lane in the first place. How about making the bus lane 24 by 7 for flowing traffic, but allow loading for specified times of the day. Once you allow loading you no longer have 'flowing traffic' in the lane! However, many bus lanes already do exactly what you describe - for example bus lanes are often 7am-10am and 4pm-7pm. Between 10am and 4pm the bus lane restrictions don't apply - but there may well be yellow lines which allow loading but not parking at these times. In other places parking may well be allowed. Always look at the parking/loading signs as well as the bus-lane ones. If they are not clear - complain, otherwise they never will be. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:16:41 -0000, "John Rowland"
wrote: "Marc Brett" wrote in message .. . On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. What's the problem with making them all 24/7? The problem is that one is not currently allowed to use bus lanes for undertaking a car waiting to turn right. What about using them when a carriageway is blocked by police horse boxes? Shepherd's Bush Road for example, when they take over the northbound side for boxes, traffic displaced to the middle (s/b) lane, s/b traffic uses bus lane. And much use of bus lane to pass the rat runners turning right. (The bus lane is policed occasionally by plod hiding behind a bus shelter; lots of drivers crane necks to check if the coast is clear and use the last 1/2 mi stretch if so). What's the problem with people just staying out of bus lanes unless they've read the sign and checked the hours? TBH it's one more thing to decode: the signs are not standardised. As others have said, some are 24h, some are Mon-Sun, some are At All Times, some are At Any Time (when's that?) and the mix of 7-10 4-7 means distractions. California has no problem with controlled green ticks and red Xs to control use of HOV lanes. London has missed a trick here IMHO. If the road is heavily laden, keep the bus lane reserved for longer with a red X (or indeed if emergency access is needed); same with the congestion zone: illuminate the red C in control times. -- New anti-spam address cmylod at despammed dot com |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
Marc Brett wrote to uk.transport.london on Mon, 8 Nov 2004:
On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. What's the problem with making them all 24/7? Seriously. When traffic is heavy, the buses get a lane to themselves, as it should be. When traffic is light, there's no need for cars to use the extra lane anyway. And, of course, it ends the confusion of when it is or is not a bus lane. And when it is not in use as a bus lane there's usually cars parked all over it so it's unusable by moving traffic anyway. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 6 November 2004 with new photos |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
Colum Mylod wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 00:16:41 -0000, "John Rowland" wrote: "Marc Brett" wrote in message .. . On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. What's the problem with making them all 24/7? The problem is that one is not currently allowed to use bus lanes for undertaking a car waiting to turn right. What about using them when a carriageway is blocked by police horse boxes? Shepherd's Bush Road for example, when they take over the northbound side for boxes, traffic displaced to the middle (s/b) lane, s/b traffic uses bus lane. And much use of bus lane to pass the rat runners turning right. (The bus lane is policed occasionally by plod hiding behind a bus shelter; lots of drivers crane necks to check if the coast is clear and use the last 1/2 mi stretch if so). What's the problem with people just staying out of bus lanes unless they've read the sign and checked the hours? TBH it's one more thing to decode: the signs are not standardised. As others have said, some are 24h, some are Mon-Sun, some are At All Times, some are At Any Time (when's that?) and the mix of 7-10 4-7 means distractions. California has no problem with controlled green ticks and red Xs to control use of HOV lanes. London has missed a trick here IMHO. If the road is heavily laden, keep the bus lane reserved for longer with a red X (or indeed if emergency access is needed); same with the congestion zone: illuminate the red C in control times. That's exactly it. If you're on a road with a part time bus lane and are familiar with the hours of operation it's easy to just pop into that lane and buzz up the inside lane. What it doesn't help with is the occasional (and you do get them) vigilante driver who thinks it is his or her duty to try and block both lanes simply to prevent you from doing something 'cheeky' and because they have not read the sign properly. Happened to me more than once. And no, I don't do it when the traffic is moving. Some of these signs are really very hard to decipher and/or take in when you go past them on the entry to the controlled area. And then you get those people who are in the right hand lane (because they've not read the sign) and who suddenly decide they need to turn left in front of you with little warning. They should (and could) have been in the left lane and out of harms way. Clear signage, whatever the rules, has got to be the way forward. Personally, I'd prefer to see the hours standardised so everyone can tell at any a glance what the rules are for the road at any one time. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 20:47:17, Marc Brett wrote:
On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. What's the problem with making them all 24/7? Seriously. When traffic is heavy, the buses get a lane to themselves, as it should be. When traffic is light, there's no need for cars to use the extra lane anyway. And, of course, it ends the confusion of when it is or is not a bus lane. I'd go with that - as long as motor-cycles can use bus lanes at all times... (A motor-bike has *never* been known to hold up a bus, at least that's what Google leads me to believe.) -- Jim Crowther "It's MY computer" (tm SMG) Always learning. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
Jim Crowther wrote in message ...
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 20:47:17, Marc Brett wrote: On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. What's the problem with making them all 24/7? Seriously. When traffic is heavy, the buses get a lane to themselves, as it should be. When traffic is light, there's no need for cars to use the extra lane anyway. And, of course, it ends the confusion of when it is or is not a bus lane. I'd go with that - as long as motor-cycles can use bus lanes at all times... (A motor-bike has *never* been known to hold up a bus, at least that's what Google leads me to believe.) Motor-bikes using bus-lanes are more likely to be involved in accidents because they go faster than the traffic in the outside lane and may not be obvious to other drivers and pedestrians until it is too late (not always the rider's fault - but the risk is there just the same). The buses also go faster but are much bigger and easier to see. And would you agree with 24hr bus lanes if you owned a small business along a bus route? Part-time bus lanes may not be ideal, but are a necessary compromise, unless you only want to shop at supermarkets. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:50:58, UM Pston wrote:
Jim Crowther wrote in message ... On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 20:47:17, Marc Brett wrote: On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: I'm getting really quite fed up with the different crazy bus lane rules all over even small parts of London. What's the problem with making them all 24/7? Seriously. When traffic is heavy, the buses get a lane to themselves, as it should be. When traffic is light, there's no need for cars to use the extra lane anyway. And, of course, it ends the confusion of when it is or is not a bus lane. I'd go with that - as long as motor-cycles can use bus lanes at all times... (A motor-bike has *never* been known to hold up a bus, at least that's what Google leads me to believe.) Motor-bikes using bus-lanes are more likely to be involved in accidents because they go faster than the traffic in the outside lane and may not be obvious to other drivers and pedestrians until it is too late (not always the rider's fault - but the risk is there just the same). A biker would be foolish to 'roar' up the inside - they should use the same care as when filtering at any time. 10-15mph faster than the slow-moving or stationary traffic as a maximum. The buses also go faster but are much bigger and easier to see. And would you agree with 24hr bus lanes if you owned a small business along a bus route? Part-time bus lanes may not be ideal, but are a necessary compromise, unless you only want to shop at supermarkets. Granted. Personally I always check the bus-lane info, as often the cars haven't spotted it's open for business, and sometimes bikes are allowed anyway. :) Indeed, not using an available bus lane when it is 'out-of-hours' is a 'minor' failure point on a driving test (car or bike). -- Jim Crowther "It's MY computer" (tm SMG) Always learning. |
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 20:47:17 +0000, Marc Brett wrote:
On 8 Nov 2004 08:49:56 -0800, (Buttoneer) wrote: What's the problem with making them all 24/7? Seriously. When traffic is heavy, the buses get a lane to themselves, as it should be. When traffic is light, there's no need for cars to use the extra lane anyway. And, of course, it ends the confusion of when it is or is not a bus lane. you clearly don't have a buslane out side your shop/house -- u n d e r a c h i e v e r |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk