![]() |
West London Tram Scheme
I thought that newsgroup readers might like to see the Electric Tbus Group's analysis of the West London Transit sceeme using 'rubber tyred electric trams', ie. Trolleybuses, as submitted to TfL. The Group found that it would be possible to wire into Ealing Hospital, into Ealing Broadway Station and avoid all diversions of 'other' traffic on to side streets (page 4). Trolleybus overhead is lighter than tram equivalents and despite having 2 wires, has generally less visual impact. The document can be found at: http://www.cyberpictures.net/WLTTbusSolution.doc Being in Microsoft Word document format it might cause your PC security to throw a wobbly but I hope that you will find a solution to that problem to enable viewing of this document which has been several months in the making. Please feel to pass it on to others. Do post a message here if you'd like to know more, sadly giving a valid email address generates more spam than my humble inbox can cope with. David Bradley |
West London Tram Scheme
David Bradley wrote:
... The document can be found at: http://www.cyberpictures.net/WLTTbusSolution.doc Being in Microsoft Word document format ... .... it may happen that some readers can not access this document at all because they don't have a reader for this format. Would you be so kind and translate it into HTML? Then anybody with a web browser could read it. Jan-Martin |
West London Tram Scheme
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:33:20 GMT, Jan-Martin Hertzsch
wrote: David Bradley wrote: ... The document can be found at: http://www.cyberpictures.net/WLTTbusSolution.doc Being in Microsoft Word document format ... ... it may happen that some readers can not access this document at all because they don't have a reader for this format. Would you be so kind and translate it into HTML? Then anybody with a web browser could read it. Jan-Martin Converting the document into HTML format has resulted in the presentation of many of the tables into a most unsatisfactory format. They are corrupted so badly that the effort to manually tidy it all up would be extensive. Perhaps converting to PDF format might be a possibility, but I don't have that software. Then of course not every web browser renders mark-up in the same way, even if it is HTML4.01 compliant, so I can't win there either! For those that don't have MS Word available on their PC, then the solution is to use the free Word Viewer obtainable from: http://office.microsoft.com/download...wd97vwr32.aspx. Yes MS Word is not the best way to circulate the information to newsgroup readers but I am sure if the end user is really **that** interested, a way will be found to read the document. In excess of a 100 downloads have been made since posting my original message, so perhaps we are all worrying about this issue quite unnecessarily. David Bradley |
West London Tram Scheme
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:11:00 +0000, David Bradley
wrote: Then of course not every web browser renders mark-up in the same way, even if it is HTML4.01 compliant, so I can't win there either! Erm, that's the whole point! If you are trying to get your pages to look that same, you will go slowly mad to no benefit. Don't even try. If the document is important, it will be the content that matters, not the presentation. For those that don't have MS Word available on their PC, then the solution is to use the free Word Viewer obtainable from: http://office.microsoft.com/download...wd97vwr32.aspx. Yes MS Word is not the best way to circulate the information to newsgroup readers but I am sure if the end user is really **that** interested, a way will be found to read the document. But you've lost the people who might quickly glance at it to see if it was of interest. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
West London Tram Scheme
format. Would you be so kind and translate it into HTML?
Then anybody with a web browser could read it. Or PDF, which is far more cross-platform than Microsoft Word files. There are free PDF writers a-plenty nowadays. |
West London Tram Scheme
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:11:00 +0000, David Bradley
wrote in : Converting the document into HTML format has resulted in the presentation of many of the tables into a most unsatisfactory format. They are corrupted so badly that the effort to manually tidy it all up would be extensive. Perhaps converting to PDF format might be a possibility, but I don't have that software. I do the following: a) Print to a PostScript printer and select "print to file". b) In cygwin or Linux use ps2pdf13 to convert the PostScript to .pdf. Only works if you have a UNIX-alike system to play with, of course. -- Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. Room 40-1-B12, CERN KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty". |
West London Tram Scheme
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:40:34 -0500, "Fustanella"
wrote: format. Would you be so kind and translate it into HTML? Then anybody with a web browser could read it. Or PDF, which is far more cross-platform than Microsoft Word files. There are free PDF writers a-plenty nowadays. Great, just one suitable URL would be helpful. David Bradley |
West London Tram Scheme
"David Bradley" wrote in message
... On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:40:34 -0500, "Fustanella" wrote: format. Would you be so kind and translate it into HTML? Then anybody with a web browser could read it. Or PDF, which is far more cross-platform than Microsoft Word files. There are free PDF writers a-plenty nowadays. Great, just one suitable URL would be helpful. CutePDF is brilliant. Appears as a printer so it couldn't be easier. Doesn't work with NT though. http://www.cutepdf.com/Products/CutePDF/writer.asp Good luck! Angus |
West London Tram Scheme
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Dr Ivan D. Reid wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:11:00 +0000, David Bradley wrote in : Converting the document into HTML format has resulted in the presentation of many of the tables into a most unsatisfactory format. They are corrupted so badly that the effort to manually tidy it all up would be extensive. Perhaps converting to PDF format might be a possibility, but I don't have that software. I do the following: a) Print to a PostScript printer and select "print to file". b) In cygwin or Linux use ps2pdf13 to convert the PostScript to .pdf. Only works if you have a UNIX-alike system to play with, of course. You can do (b) with Ghostscript, which runs natively (ie without Cygwin) on Windows, too; you just feed it the PostScript file and tell it to use pdf as its output device (i forget the exact flags, but it's pretty straightforward). Alternatively, use a Mac, where you can print straight to PDF without any fancy software - or at least, any fancy software other than OS X! tom -- I'm angry, but not Milk and Cheese angry. -- Mike Froggatt |
West London Tram Scheme
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:46:11 +0000, Tom Anderson
wrote in : On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Dr Ivan D. Reid wrote: On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:11:00 +0000, David Bradley wrote in : Converting the document into HTML format has resulted in the presentation of many of the tables into a most unsatisfactory format. They are corrupted so badly that the effort to manually tidy it all up would be extensive. Perhaps converting to PDF format might be a possibility, but I don't have that software. I do the following: a) Print to a PostScript printer and select "print to file". b) In cygwin or Linux use ps2pdf13 to convert the PostScript to .pdf. Only works if you have a UNIX-alike system to play with, of course. You can do (b) with Ghostscript, which runs natively (ie without Cygwin) on Windows, too; you just feed it the PostScript file and tell it to use pdf as its output device (i forget the exact flags, but it's pretty straightforward). That's entirely reasonable, as the family of ps2pdf converters are just frontends for ghostscript. Alternatively, use a Mac, where you can print straight to PDF without any fancy software - or at least, any fancy software other than OS X! Which is, of course, a UNIX-alike. :-) -- Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. Room 40-1-B12, CERN GSX600F, RG250WD. "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO# 003, 005 WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon) KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty". |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk