Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"By 2004, the DVLA aims to have merged driver, vehicle and insurance
records into a "single or virtually single" database from which the number-plate microchips will be programmed". http://www.geocities.com/lclane2/microchips.html Anyone have any updates on how this plan is getting along? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"By 2004, the DVLA aims to have merged driver, vehicle and insurance
records into a "single or virtually single" database from which the number-plate microchips will be programmed". http://www.geocities.com/lclane2/microchips.html Anyone have any updates on how this plan is getting along? Anything relating to a Government department and an IT initiative usually ends up in millions of taxpayers money being wasted over several years and then the whole lot being scrapped as it suddenly becomes unworkable and too expensive. There is then another 2 years of Public Accounts Committee inquiry - with more money wasted on accountants and solicitors trying to work out what went wrong, by which time, nobody cares because the governments already got it's eye on another Big White Elephant. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 03:22:13 -0800, Matthew Church wrote:
"By 2004, the DVLA aims to have merged driver, vehicle and insurance records into a "single or virtually single" database from which the number-plate microchips will be programmed". http://www.geocities.com/lclane2/microchips.html Anyone have any updates on how this plan is getting along? Well, the last I heard (and there's about 45 days left in 2004) you couldn't buy Microchipped plates. If true it's a typical Public Sector IT project i.e. it doesn't work. It will annoy a lot of people, and the chips will be as tamper proof as the others, i.e. not at all. Or people will simply bust them (can you imagine the amount of hammering electronics on a car number plate will take). Or you could simply fake a plate that looks like a real one - so how will the "automatic detection" know if a car is there or not ? How will it cope with people who are insured rather than cars - people on company insurance ? How will it know the driver is insured to drive the car - all it will know is that there is *some* insurance on the car. It can't surely store "insurance validity" - if you cancel insurance will you detach the plates and take them in so they can be reprogrammed ? What will happen regarding foreign registered vehicles ? Getting Microchips for £1.00 is no problem ; hell they are cheaper than that. Getting something that will work and keep working for £1.00 is a different matter entirely. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Robson" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 03:22:13 -0800, Matthew Church wrote: "By 2004, the DVLA aims to have merged driver, vehicle and insurance records into a "single or virtually single" database from which the number-plate microchips will be programmed". http://www.geocities.com/lclane2/microchips.html Anyone have any updates on how this plan is getting along? Well, the last I heard (and there's about 45 days left in 2004) you couldn't buy Microchipped plates. If true it's a typical Public Sector IT project i.e. it doesn't work. It will annoy a lot of people, and the chips will be as tamper proof as the others, i.e. not at all. Or people will simply bust them (can you imagine the amount of hammering electronics on a car number plate will take). Or you could simply fake a plate that looks like a real one - so how will the "automatic detection" know if a car is there or not ? How will it cope with people who are insured rather than cars - people on company insurance ? How will it know the driver is insured to drive the car - all it will know is that there is *some* insurance on the car. It can't surely store "insurance validity" - if you cancel insurance will you detach the plates and take them in so they can be reprogrammed ? What will happen regarding foreign registered vehicles ? Getting Microchips for £1.00 is no problem ; hell they are cheaper than that. Getting something that will work and keep working for £1.00 is a different matter entirely. And that is why all cars should have a tachometer, that is taken into the post office every year and any outstanding speeding fines , parking tickets and indicator abuse can be payed up to date with neccasary points added to your licence etc etc etc. Thus the post office would survive the criminal car driver would'nt thrive, and more pedestrians would stay alive. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.781 / Virus Database: 527 - Release Date: 21/10/2004 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "CapStick" wrote in message ... "Paul Robson" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 03:22:13 -0800, Matthew Church wrote: "By 2004, the DVLA aims to have merged driver, vehicle and insurance records into a "single or virtually single" database from which the number-plate microchips will be programmed". http://www.geocities.com/lclane2/microchips.html Anyone have any updates on how this plan is getting along? Well, the last I heard (and there's about 45 days left in 2004) you couldn't buy Microchipped plates. If true it's a typical Public Sector IT project i.e. it doesn't work. It will annoy a lot of people, and the chips will be as tamper proof as the others, i.e. not at all. Or people will simply bust them (can you imagine the amount of hammering electronics on a car number plate will take). Or you could simply fake a plate that looks like a real one - so how will the "automatic detection" know if a car is there or not ? How will it cope with people who are insured rather than cars - people on company insurance ? How will it know the driver is insured to drive the car - all it will know is that there is *some* insurance on the car. It can't surely store "insurance validity" - if you cancel insurance will you detach the plates and take them in so they can be reprogrammed ? What will happen regarding foreign registered vehicles ? Getting Microchips for £1.00 is no problem ; hell they are cheaper than that. Getting something that will work and keep working for £1.00 is a different matter entirely. And that is why all cars should have a tachometer, that is taken into the post office every year and any outstanding speeding fines , parking tickets and indicator abuse can be payed up to date with neccasary points added to your licence etc etc etc. Thus the post office would survive the criminal car driver would'nt thrive, and more pedestrians would stay alive. thats ********, the post office survives anyway "criminal car drivers" can simply get the license plate changed to a registered one or just take in a registered number plate and more pedestrians wouldnt stay alive, think about it; nobody will know that the pedestrian will get run over until it happens, until then you cant stop it happening without affecting the majority, and after its happened theyre going to drive much more carefully and i highly doubt it would happen twice. the government should not be allowed to govern our lives to this extent, its a threat to the security of our society. also what if the tachometer stops working? what about foreign cars? what about car manufacturers that decide not to put them into their cars? they cant be shut down, most of them are foreign and they cant shut down a car manufacturer n the UK, think of the job losses and tax losses |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, the last I heard (and there's about 45 days left in 2004) you
couldn't buy Microchipped plates. If true it's a typical Public Sector IT project i.e. it doesn't work. Quite likely! My wife works in the NHS and you should hear about the amount they waste on failed IT projects. It will annoy a lot of people, and the chips will be as tamper proof as the others, i.e. not at all. Or people will simply bust them (can you imagine the amount of hammering electronics on a car number plate will take). This article is very misleading. The microchip is actually a transponder which sends out a unique identifier when read by an appropriate device. It does not in itself contain any information and is a sealed unit. There is no programming interface, the ID is set by the manufacturer in the manufacturing process. That unique identifier will be used to look up the information on the computer database. The system is actually no different from what is in existence now with automatic number plate readers fitted to cameras and police cars. These microchips are tansponders and are highly robust, and making a reading of the ID is easier than reading a written number plate, which could be mis-represented, dirty, or just hard to read due to ambient conditions. Transponders suffer none of these problems. Or you could simply fake a plate that looks like a real one - so how will the "automatic detection" know if a car is there or not ? Because the device reading the microchip will not detect its existence in the plate. Simple - if it ain't there, then it is fake! How will it cope with people who are insured rather than cars - people on company insurance ? Because on policies that have multiple vehicles and multiple drivers the cars are explicitly detailed on the policy. This in nothing new, the insurance / tax & mot status of all vehicles is already part of a database (MID for insurance) which the police can look up live now by reading your number plate. There are many police cars with this system already fitted, and it is used very sucessfully. How will it know the driver is insured to drive the car - all it will know is that there is *some* insurance on the car. as above - nothing new. Just because you are stopped does not mean you are instantly guilty, it just means that there is no record of insurance for that vehicle (or of you being insured to drive it) if you can later produce documentary evidence to the police then no action is taken - this is no different from what happens now when you get a producer. It can't surely store "insurance validity" - if you cancel insurance will you detach the plates and take them in so they can be reprogrammed ? What will happen regarding foreign registered vehicles ? Such a miniscule problem, why worry? Getting Microchips for £1.00 is no problem ; hell they are cheaper than that. Getting something that will work and keep working for £1.00 is a different matter entirely. I started work using transponders 15 years ago for an identification system in which they were subject to an industrial washing process, then temperatures of nearly 200deg C and they continued to work just fine! Anything that helps stop scum get away with no insurance/tax/mot has to be good. If it inconveniences legal motorists (although highly unlikely) then so what. Matt. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
what about car manufacturers that decide not to put them into their cars?
they cant be shut down, most of them are foreign and they cant shut down a car manufacturer n the UK, think of the job losses and tax losses WTF are you on about? That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. However, given your unsucessful atempts to produce sentences in English, your comment does not come as a complete surprise. Are you seriously suggesting that if a car manufacturer decides to produce a car that does not confirm to UK legal standards (e.g. they decide that the indicators do not look good on their new car, so they don't bother putting them on) that the government will be unable to stop these cars from being used legally? The government sets legal standards for motor vehicles. If manufacturers do not produce vehicles that abide by those standards, then they cannot be used on the public highway, simple as that. Matt |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Matthew
Maddock writes Or you could simply fake a plate that looks like a real one - so how will the "automatic detection" know if a car is there or not ? Because the device reading the microchip will not detect its existence in the plate. Simple - if it ain't there, then it is fake! From the transponder reader's pov, what's the difference between a car without a transponder and an empty space without a transponder? What will happen regarding foreign registered vehicles ? Such a miniscule problem, why worry? I'd like to know what will happen to foreign visitors if they bring their cars to the UK. Will the cars be impounded? How will the system detect a foreign car? -- Mike |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or you could simply fake a plate that looks like a real one - so how
will the "automatic detection" know if a car is there or not ? Because the device reading the microchip will not detect its existence in the plate. Simple - if it ain't there, then it is fake! From the transponder reader's pov, what's the difference between a car without a transponder and an empty space without a transponder? Presumably the system would be tied up with an appropriate camera which would detect the presence of a vehicle, but I take your point, and failing such a system it would depend on a person being present - say in a police car which had the facility to read the transponder. What will happen regarding foreign registered vehicles ? Such a miniscule problem, why worry? I'd like to know what will happen to foreign visitors if they bring their cars to the UK. Will the cars be impounded? Presumably if they commit an offence, they would be dealt with in the same way they are now. AIUI they are fast-tracked through the magistrates court if necessary. If they are not committing an offence, then there is no problem. Like I said, such a tiny problem, why worry? Let their own country deal with them - we reportedly have over one million uninsured motorists in the UK, lets worry about those first! How will the system detect a foreign car? You could say the same thing about the current system of number plate recognition - the UK system is setup to read UK number plates, not foreign ones - same problem. I do believe that this sort of device is the way forward. I'm not saying that it will be without its own set of problems, but if one million motorists are happily driving around uninsured, then the current system is far from acceptable. Whether the public sector has the ability to pull it off remains to be seen!! Matt. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Matthew
Maddock writes If manufacturers do not produce vehicles that abide by those standards, then they cannot be used on the public highway, simple as that. Matt That'll be why the government can't stop Citroen from fitting asbestos brake pads then. -- Clive. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cycle number plates | London Transport | |||
Bike number plates mooted | London Transport | |||
Black and yellow plates | London Transport | |||
Recycling bus number-plates | London Transport | |||
Underground data plates | London Transport |