![]() |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
The first L&SW trains to Kingston-on-Railway (nowadays Surbiton) were
notable for having people riding on top and people riding below. Were they double-deckers? |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
"Martin WY" wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Nov 04 02:55:07 GMT, (Charles Ellson) wrote: In article "Troy Steadman" writes: The first L&SW trains to Kingston-on-Railway (nowadays Surbiton) were notable for having people riding on top and people riding below. Were they double-deckers? Don't some old pictures show passengers on top of the stage-coaches-on-rails as used on early railways, not so much "on top" as at the ends. There were double deck trains in Lonon in the 40s and has been discussed on here before. http://www.yellins.co.uk/transporthi...l/ddtrain.html The Mumbles Railway had double-decked open-topped vehicles, which I rode on as a small child. However, though this was called a 'railway', it was really a cross between what the Americans refer to as an 'Interurban' and a tramway. Almost all the 'main line' was on a reserved track to the side of the main road to Mumbles. In the 1840s, some of the French companies used open-topped double deck stock on Paris suburban services, which were nicknamed 'Imperiales' as they appeared during the Second Empire- some of them may have even survived until the 1930s in commercial service, whilst there was a preserved example at the big SNCF exhibition in Paris last year. As for examples on the UK main line railways, I would have thought the loading gauge was a little restrictive. Brian |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
"BH Williams" wrote in message
... The Mumbles Railway had double-decked open-topped vehicles, which I rode on as a small child. However, though this was called a 'railway', it was really a cross between what the Americans refer to as an 'Interurban' and a tramway. Almost all the 'main line' was on a reserved track to the side of the main road to Mumbles. In the 1840s, some of the French companies used open-topped double deck stock on Paris suburban services, which were nicknamed 'Imperiales' as they appeared during the Second Empire- some of them may have even survived until the 1930s in commercial service, whilst there was a preserved example at the big SNCF exhibition in Paris last year. As for examples on the UK main line railways, I would have thought the loading gauge was a little restrictive. I never realised that they had some open-toppers. I only rode it once, in 1951, and it was a fascinating experience, with two cars coupled together, as I recall. How were the bow collectors mounted? -- Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society 75th Anniversary 2004, see http://www.omnibussoc.org/75th.htm E-mail: URL: http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/ |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
"Terry Harper" wrote in message ... "BH Williams" wrote in message ... The Mumbles Railway had double-decked open-topped vehicles, which I rode on as a small child. However, though this was called a 'railway', it was really a cross between what the Americans refer to as an 'Interurban' and a tramway. Almost all the 'main line' was on a reserved track to the side of the main road to Mumbles. In the 1840s, some of the French companies used open-topped double deck stock on Paris suburban services, which were nicknamed 'Imperiales' as they appeared during the Second Empire- some of them may have even survived until the 1930s in commercial service, whilst there was a preserved example at the big SNCF exhibition in Paris last year. As for examples on the UK main line railways, I would have thought the loading gauge was a little restrictive. I never realised that they had some open-toppers. I only rode it once, in 1951, and it was a fascinating experience, with two cars coupled together, as I recall. How were the bow collectors mounted? -- Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society 75th Anniversary 2004, see http://www.omnibussoc.org/75th.htm E-mail: I was only four or five at the time and much more interested in the seats which had backs that could be folded according to the direction of travel... It was a great pity that none were preserved _ I believe one was at the Middleton Railway, but got burnt. The Slow, Wicked and Terrible bus company used the last bit of the route into Mumbles as a dedicated bus route Brian |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, BH Williams wrote:
[excessive quotage now snipped] I was only four or five at the time and much more interested in the seats which had backs that could be folded according to the direction of travel... Sounds like me as a toddler on the rare occasions I was taken on Birmingham trams. Where can we see one of those today? We never actually went to the terminus (Rednal, IIRC), and I was fascinated by the idea of changing ends and reversing the seat backs. But they'd been abolished before I was paying proper attention. It was a great pity that none were preserved Indeed. I wouldn't want the place to be overrun with antiques, but we've plenty of scope for keeping a few. Works for me (the house is from the 1880's, perhaps a bit earlier ;-) |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
(Charles Ellson) wrote in message ...
In article "Troy Steadman" writes: The first L&SW trains to Kingston-on-Railway (nowadays Surbiton) were notable for having people riding on top and people riding below. Were they double-deckers? Don't some old pictures show passengers on top of the stage-coaches-on-rails as used on early railways, not so much "on top" as at the ends. Yup, the old stagecoaches had a driver on top at the front and a postillion (at least I've remembered that name even if I've no idea how to spell it) at the back. The early pictures of the L&SW show people perched on a seat outside on the top front of each carriage in the direct line of the smoke. |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
In article ,
Troy Steadman wrote: (Charles Ellson) wrote in message ... Don't some old pictures show passengers on top of the stage-coaches-on-rails as used on early railways, not so much "on top" as at the ends. Yup, the old stagecoaches had a driver on top at the front and a postillion (at least I've remembered that name even if I've no idea how to spell it) at the back. The early pictures of the L&SW show people perched on a seat outside on the top front of each carriage in the direct line of the smoke. "People" or "person" ? I'm not familar with the pictures you mention, but ISTR some early railways had a brakeman in a "dicky seat" on the outside of each vehicle - obviously borrowed from coaching practice ! Nick -- http://www.leverton.org/ ... So express yourself ... |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
"Nick Leverton" wrote in message ... In article , Troy Steadman wrote: (Charles Ellson) wrote in message ... Don't some old pictures show passengers on top of the stage-coaches-on-rails as used on early railways, not so much "on top" as at the ends. Yup, the old stagecoaches had a driver on top at the front and a postillion (at least I've remembered that name even if I've no idea how to spell it) at the back. The early pictures of the L&SW show people perched on a seat outside on the top front of each carriage in the direct line of the smoke. "People" or "person" ? I'm not familar with the pictures you mention, but ISTR some early railways had a brakeman in a "dicky seat" on the outside of each vehicle - obviously borrowed from coaching practice ! Nick -- http://www.leverton.org/ ... So express yourself ... A practice which continued on some continental railways on freight trains until relatively recent times- whilst the more recent ones were a covered section of platform,housing a screw brake, I have seen stock from as recently as the inter-war period where the cabin was raised sufficently for the brakeman to have a view along the length of the train. The Southern Railway built some four-wheel brakes for the Night Ferry which had a similar feature, albeit in the middle of the vehicle. Brian |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
"JF" wrote in message ... A few finger signposts around my part of Surrey survived the round-up of cast iron signposts during the last war. The finger is usually about three metres above ground level for the benefit of coach drivers. -- James Follett. Novelist. (G1LXP) What, so they could pick their noses as they passed by without having to take their hands off the reins? :o) -- Dave (Sgt. Pepper) Epsom, England Nikon D2H / D100 / Coolpix 5700 / Canon Ixus 400 / Paintshop Pro 8 My photo galleries at http://www.pbase.com/davecq |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
"BH Williams" wrote in message
... A practice which continued on some continental railways on freight trains until relatively recent times- whilst the more recent ones were a covered section of platform,housing a screw brake, I have seen stock from as recently as the inter-war period where the cabin was raised sufficently for the brakeman to have a view along the length of the train. The Southern Railway built some four-wheel brakes for the Night Ferry which had a similar feature, albeit in the middle of the vehicle. Hornby used to produce some French models of the vehicles with a brakeman's cabin in the 1930s. I can remember seeing them in their catalogue, along with a Nord 4-4-2 and CIWL cars. -- Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society 75th Anniversary 2004, see http://www.omnibussoc.org/75th.htm E-mail: URL: http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/ |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
Alan J. Flavell wrote to uk.transport.london on Thu, 18 Nov 2004:
Sounds like me as a toddler on the rare occasions I was taken on Birmingham trams. Where can we see one of those today? We never actually went to the terminus (Rednal, IIRC), and I was fascinated by the idea of changing ends and reversing the seat backs. Me, I was fascinated by those on the Star Ferry in Hong Kong when I was the mother of a toddler, never mind being one! -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 6 November 2004 with new photos |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
"Alan J. Flavell" wrote in message . gla.ac.uk...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, BH Williams wrote: [excessive quotage now snipped] I was only four or five at the time and much more interested in the seats which had backs that could be folded according to the direction of travel... Sounds like me as a toddler on the rare occasions I was taken on Birmingham trams. Where can we see one of those today? We never actually went to the terminus (Rednal, IIRC), and I was fascinated by the idea of changing ends and reversing the seat backs. But they'd been abolished before I was paying proper attention. It was a great pity that none were preserved Doesn't the Black Country Museum have a tram from that part of the World on its system? I seem to remember that they ran on track of a narrower gauge than standard, but I can't remember what it was. Many of the modern trains on New Jersey Transit have reversible backs. |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
In message , Stephen
Furley writes "Alan J. Flavell" wrote in message news:Pine.LN .. . On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, BH Williams wrote: [excessive quotage now snipped] I was only four or five at the time and much more interested in the seats which had backs that could be folded according to the direction of travel... Sounds like me as a toddler on the rare occasions I was taken on Birmingham trams. Where can we see one of those today? We never actually went to the terminus (Rednal, IIRC), and I was fascinated by the idea of changing ends and reversing the seat backs. But they'd been abolished before I was paying proper attention. It was a great pity that none were preserved Doesn't the Black Country Museum have a tram from that part of the World on its system? Well, they have three trams two "Tividale" type single deckers (of which one, 5, is no longer operational and the other, 34, provides the mainstay of the Museum service). A Wolverhampton District car (49) has also recently entered service but is used sparingly. I seem to remember that they ran on track of a narrower gauge than standard, but I can't remember what it was. It was 3' 6" (or 1067mm). Only one complete Birmingham tram remains in existence, car 395, which is now on display at Think Tank, Birmingham's Science and Technology Museum. Although they are very close (and shared a common tramway gauge (with connections) it is worth mentioning that Birmingham and the Black Country are very different area with much (friendly!) local rivalry. People from one area get slightly huffy at being mistaken for natives of the "other" area. For that reason alone, I suspect that seeing 395 restored to operational condition and operated on the Museum line at the Black Country Museum would be very unlikely. That said, I would dearly *love* to see it done! Many of the modern trains on New Jersey Transit have reversible backs. As do trains on the Sydney system, the only place I've ever seen that on a railway. -- Ian Jelf, MITG, Birmingham, UK Registered "Blue Badge" Tourist Guide for London & the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
"Stephen Furley" wrote in message ... "Alan J. Flavell" wrote in message . gla.ac.uk... On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, BH Williams wrote: [excessive quotage now snipped] I was only four or five at the time and much more interested in the seats which had backs that could be folded according to the direction of travel... Sounds like me as a toddler on the rare occasions I was taken on Birmingham trams. Where can we see one of those today? We never actually went to the terminus (Rednal, IIRC), and I was fascinated by the idea of changing ends and reversing the seat backs. But they'd been abolished before I was paying proper attention. It was a great pity that none were preserved Doesn't the Black Country Museum have a tram from that part of the World on its system? I seem to remember that they ran on track of a narrower gauge than standard, but I can't remember what it was. Many of the modern trains on New Jersey Transit have reversible backs. |
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
|
Trivia: Victorian double-decker trains?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk