![]() |
|
Late-night Tube plan announced
"Dave Liney" wrote in message .. . "Sir Benjamin Nunn" wrote in message ... What about people who've been out on Saturday, but whose trains (or ****ing replacement coaches) arrive late back into London? All the operators are guilty, but thinking specifically of Virgin Trains West Coast mainline, it is not unlikely for trains from Glasgow, Liverpool etc. to be delayed by more than an hour or two throughout the course of their journey? The /last/ thing I want to do when I've been travelling for about six hours is to have to extended my journey further via a combination of night buses to get to my destination. When I was delayed by 1.5 hours coming into Euston on the last train and so had missed the last tube Virgin paid for a taxi back to Clapham for me. I thought that was standard. When I was delayed by 4 hours on a ****ing rubbish coach, they said there would be someone there at Euston to arrange taxis. There wasn't. We all had to arrange and pay for our own taxis, and I'm still waiting to be reimbursed. BTN |
Late-night Tube plan announced
"Chris" wrote in message om... The /last/ thing I want to do when I've been travelling for about six hours is to have to extended my journey further via a combination of night buses to get to my destination. So I presume you are for the extended openning then? Very much so. Ideally, I'd like to see some sort of 24-hour service, or at the very least high-speed replacement nightbuses that only called at the stations. BTN |
Late-night Tube plan announced
|
Late-night Tube plan announced
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: You have routes like the N74 (Roehampton - Putney), N28 (Wandsworth - Camden Town) and N31 (Clapham Junction - Kilburn) which cross the centre without terminating. How does the N74 cross the centre between Roehampton and Putney then? Oops. I was trying to correct Putney to Roehampton, but accidentally corrected Baker Street to Roehampton. It's meant to be Baker Street to Roehampton. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Late-night Tube plan announced
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: You have routes like the N74 (Roehampton - Putney), N28 (Wandsworth - Camden Town) and N31 (Clapham Junction - Kilburn) which cross the centre without terminating. How does the N74 cross the centre between Roehampton and Putney then? Oops. I was trying to correct Putney to Roehampton, but accidentally corrected Baker Street to Roehampton. It's meant to be Baker Street to Roehampton. Thanks. I'm not sure I even count Roehampton to Baker Street as crossing the centre either as it happens. Depends on your definition of the centre! It enters the congestion charging zone and it spends a significant portion of its journey in Zone 1. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Late-night Tube plan announced
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Arquati wrote:
Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: You have routes like the N74 (Roehampton - Putney), N28 (Wandsworth - Camden Town) and N31 (Clapham Junction - Kilburn) which cross the centre without terminating. How does the N74 cross the centre between Roehampton and Putney then? Oops. I was trying to correct Putney to Roehampton, but accidentally corrected Baker Street to Roehampton. It's meant to be Baker Street to Roehampton. Thanks. I'm not sure I even count Roehampton to Baker Street as crossing the centre either as it happens. Depends on your definition of the centre! It enters the congestion charging zone and it spends a significant portion of its journey in Zone 1. Doesn't go anywhere central, though, does it? Hyde Park Corner? Park Lane? Marble Arch? All distinctly west. You've spent too much time at Kensington Polytechnic (or whatever it's called these days), young man! tom -- Gin makes a man mean; let's booze up and riot! |
Late-night Tube plan announced
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Arquati wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: You have routes like the N74 (Roehampton - Putney), N28 (Wandsworth - Camden Town) and N31 (Clapham Junction - Kilburn) which cross the centre without terminating. How does the N74 cross the centre between Roehampton and Putney then? Oops. I was trying to correct Putney to Roehampton, but accidentally corrected Baker Street to Roehampton. It's meant to be Baker Street to Roehampton. Thanks. I'm not sure I even count Roehampton to Baker Street as crossing the centre either as it happens. Depends on your definition of the centre! It enters the congestion charging zone and it spends a significant portion of its journey in Zone 1. Doesn't go anywhere central, though, does it? Hyde Park Corner? Park Lane? Marble Arch? All distinctly west. Don't say that to all those bloody tourists queueing at Gloucester Road on a Saturday morning for day travelcards. They might think their hotels weren't central enough. You've spent too much time at Kensington Polytechnic (or whatever it's called these days), young man! Well, they didn't produce 14 Nobel laureates by letting the students stay at home all day... -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Late-night Tube plan announced
|
Late-night Tube plan announced
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Arquati wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: You have routes like the N74 (Roehampton - Putney), N28 (Wandsworth - Camden Town) and N31 (Clapham Junction - Kilburn) which cross the centre without terminating. How does the N74 cross the centre between Roehampton and Putney then? Oops. I was trying to correct Putney to Roehampton, but accidentally corrected Baker Street to Roehampton. It's meant to be Baker Street to Roehampton. Thanks. I'm not sure I even count Roehampton to Baker Street as crossing the centre either as it happens. Depends on your definition of the centre! It enters the congestion charging zone and it spends a significant portion of its journey in Zone 1. Doesn't go anywhere central, though, does it? Hyde Park Corner? Park Lane? Marble Arch? All distinctly west. Considering that Hyde Park Corner was at one time the point from which distances from London were measured (before being replaced for that task by Charing Cross), it would seem to eminently central. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Late-night Tube plan announced
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Richard J. wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Arquati wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: You have routes like the N74 (Roehampton - Putney), N28 (Wandsworth - Camden Town) and N31 (Clapham Junction - Kilburn) which cross the centre without terminating. How does the N74 cross the centre between Roehampton and Putney then? Oops. I was trying to correct Putney to Roehampton, but accidentally corrected Baker Street to Roehampton. It's meant to be Baker Street to Roehampton. Thanks. I'm not sure I even count Roehampton to Baker Street as crossing the centre either as it happens. Depends on your definition of the centre! It enters the congestion charging zone and it spends a significant portion of its journey in Zone 1. Doesn't go anywhere central, though, does it? Hyde Park Corner? Park Lane? Marble Arch? All distinctly west. Considering that Hyde Park Corner was at one time the point from which distances from London were measured (before being replaced for that task by Charing Cross), it would seem to eminently central. Key phrases here are "was at one time", "were measured", and "before being replaced", all of which pertain to past states of affairs, rather than those holding at the present :). The centre of London is like the magnetic north pole - it drifts. In particular, it seems to drift from palace to palace - from the Tower, to Buck House (the era when Hyde Park Corner was central, presumably), to Westminster, and, most recently, the Palace Theatre. tom -- It's almost over now. |
Late-night Tube plan announced
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: I'm not sure I even count Roehampton to Baker Street as crossing the centre either as it happens. Depends on your definition of the centre! It enters the congestion charging zone and it spends a significant portion of its journey in Zone 1. Doesn't cross Zone 1 and emerge the other side though. This could go on for a while. Shall we forget about the N74? -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Late-night Tube plan announced
Dave Arquati wrote in message ...
Tom Anderson wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Dave Arquati wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (Dave Arquati) wrote: You have routes like the N74 (Roehampton - Putney), N28 (Wandsworth - Camden Town) and N31 (Clapham Junction - Kilburn) which cross the centre without terminating. How does the N74 cross the centre between Roehampton and Putney then? Oops. I was trying to correct Putney to Roehampton, but accidentally corrected Baker Street to Roehampton. It's meant to be Baker Street to Roehampton. Thanks. I'm not sure I even count Roehampton to Baker Street as crossing the centre either as it happens. Depends on your definition of the centre! It enters the congestion charging zone and it spends a significant portion of its journey in Zone 1. Doesn't go anywhere central, though, does it? Hyde Park Corner? Park Lane? Marble Arch? All distinctly west. Don't say that to all those bloody tourists queueing at Gloucester Road on a Saturday morning for day travelcards. They might think their hotels weren't central enough. Aka why the hotels near Paddington station are a very good idea - you have the FGW ticket office as well as the LU one to choose from. |
Late-night Tube plan announced
"UM Pston" wrote in message
om... Paul Weaver wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:18:58 +0000, umpston wrote: Yes you are. There is no need for an hour less of useful workers - in todays "can do" society companies can just change their shifts to match the tubes. Or helpfully advise their employees to get bikes. Anybody else has no business to be up at such unearthly hours on the weekend. A another 9-5 shiftist. No. I work when I feel like it, whether it be 10-6 or 7-3. I'd recommend the same for anybody. Still the same, 8 hours 5 days single minded biggotry -- Everything above is the personal opinion of the author, and nothing to do with where he works and all that lovely disclaimery stuff. Posted in his lunch hour too. |
Late-night Tube plan announced
So we disadvantage the early morning traveller getting to work WITH a
ticket, in favour of the drunk, abusive chav, without a ticket, Nurse Nurse more drugs please. Mad Von Clinkerhoffen Phil Richards wrote: redtube wrote: "A plan to run London Underground services for an extra hour on Friday and Saturday nights will be put to Londoners, the Mayor has said. Oh yeah are they going to put the idea to the Train Ops as well? So a change to rosters, perhaps. What's wrong with that? Most staff who finish work late in the day will still have to rely upon getting home by car or night bus with the existing arrangements, I can't see what extra difficulties will be met with finishing say an hour or two later two nights a week. It seems the case is clear. You can have a later closed close down time at Weekends at the expense of a later start up time the following mornings? Perhaps we ought to be questioning whether or not the maintenance work can be fitted around slightly longer operational hours by retaining existing start up times and for two nights a week just loosing an hour or two at the end of the day. |
Late-night Tube plan announced
General Von Clinkerhoffen wrote to uk.transport.london on Wed, 1 Dec
2004: So we disadvantage the early morning traveller getting to work WITH a ticket, in favour of the drunk, abusive chav, without a ticket, Nurse Nurse more drugs please. But I wonder how many people actually *need* to get to work at, for instance, 6.00 am on a Sunday? Sure, some do, but it is only a very small minority of people who would be seriously inconvenienced. Besides which, AIUI, this is a proposal, not a done deed - and a proposal means just that - you can write and say "Oi, what about me and my ilk?" and put the case for the status quo. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 28 November 2004 |
Late-night Tube plan announced
Oh dear Mrs Redboots.....no one gets to work on the tube at 6am on a
sunday......there is a fair few people getting to work at 7am though. Oh and a huge amount of people going home from the night before! Always makes an interesting early shift....the new lovers...the dumped partners.....quite amazing!! "Mrs Redboots" wrote in message ... General Von Clinkerhoffen wrote to uk.transport.london on Wed, 1 Dec 2004: So we disadvantage the early morning traveller getting to work WITH a ticket, in favour of the drunk, abusive chav, without a ticket, Nurse Nurse more drugs please. But I wonder how many people actually *need* to get to work at, for instance, 6.00 am on a Sunday? Sure, some do, but it is only a very small minority of people who would be seriously inconvenienced. Besides which, AIUI, this is a proposal, not a done deed - and a proposal means just that - you can write and say "Oi, what about me and my ilk?" and put the case for the status quo. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 28 November 2004 |
Late-night Tube plan announced
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 20:23:18 GMT, "Malcolm & Nika"
wrote: Oh dear Mrs Redboots.....no one gets to work on the tube at 6am on a sunday......there is a fair few people getting to work at 7am though. Oh and a huge amount of people going home from the night before! Always makes an interesting early shift....the new lovers...the dumped partners.....quite amazing!! Which is why Ken is consulting on the proposals - he doesn't have to. He could just bulldoze them through.... Rob. -- rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk |
Late-night Tube plan announced
"Paul Weaver" wrote in message
... "UM Pston" wrote in message om... Paul Weaver wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:18:58 +0000, umpston wrote: Yes you are. There is no need for an hour less of useful workers - in todays "can do" society companies can just change their shifts to match the tubes. Or helpfully advise their employees to get bikes. Anybody else has no business to be up at such unearthly hours on the weekend. A another 9-5 shiftist. No. I work when I feel like it, whether it be 10-6 or 7-3. I'd recommend the same for anybody. Still the same, 8 hours 5 days single minded biggotry I may be opinionated, flippant and a little rude sometimes but bigoted? It appears you are the one with a prejudice - are you seriously suggesting there is something wrong with working regular hours? Many people like it. I don't think it would suit me but I have no quarrel in principle with anyone who prefers an alternative lifestyle to mine. |
Late-night Tube plan announced
Malcolm & Nika wrote to uk.transport.london on Wed, 1 Dec 2004:
Oh dear Mrs Redboots.....no one gets to work on the tube at 6am on a sunday......there is a fair few people getting to work at 7am though. Oh and a huge amount of people going home from the night before! Always makes an interesting early shift....the new lovers...the dumped partners.....quite amazing!! I sometimes get an early (6.30 ish) bus down to Streatham on a Sunday morning - time was, before they improved bus timetables, it would be the first bus of the day, full of home-bound revellers, and smelling of beer! -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 28 November 2004 |
Late-night Tube plan announced
In message ,
Tom Anderson writes Buck House Ah, the biggest council house in the land, and rent free too. -- Clive. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk