Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
.... at putting hundreds at risk.
The 11.53 today (Sunday) ex-Hayes to Paddington FGWL strain arrived - well eventually - fully 25 minutes late - but packed to the gunnels. It was a three car unit - the rear car was completely locked out of use. This meant that EVERYONE had to pack into the two forward cars. We left after a ten minute squeeze into an already jammed train. We stopped at Southall where even more tried to get on board - most failed - most were left behind - they'd waited an hour. By this time you'd have thought that an apology was due from the driver - but NONE was made. We endured the most appalling cattle truck conditions - babies and mothers, the elderly, hundreds of others - until Ealing - where there was a gigantic squash for some to disembark, and many more embark. Again this took about 10 minutes. We arrived at Paddington almost an HOUR late. Again no apology - no-one to complain to - no apology from the driver. As someone remarked is this really 2004. God help us when they reduce the local service even further in December to make way for more over-priced HEX services. (I use the word 'service' with complete sarcasm - FGWL wouldn't know what a service was). SB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "S.Byers" wrote in message om... ... at putting hundreds at risk. surely they put themselves at risk by attempting to get into an already full train. Indeed those getting on at Southall exacerbated the situation and put "babies and mothers, the elderly, hundreds of others" at even greater risk by squeezing in. Would an apology from the driver have magically conjured up another three cars? Al |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Huge wrote:
(S.Byers) writes: The 11.53 today (Sunday) ex-Hayes to Paddington FGWL strain arrived - well eventually - fully 25 minutes late - but packed to the gunnels. It's "gunwhales", BTW. actually, it's "gunwales". CC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "S.Byers" wrote in message om... ... at putting hundreds at risk. The 11.53 today (Sunday) ex-Hayes to Paddington FGWL strain arrived - well eventually - fully 25 minutes late - but packed to the gunnels. It was a three car unit - the rear car was completely locked out of use. This meant that EVERYONE had to pack into the two forward cars. We left after a ten minute squeeze into an already jammed train. We stopped at Southall where even more tried to get on board - most failed - most were left behind - they'd waited an hour. By this time you'd have thought that an apology was due from the driver - but NONE was made. We endured the most appalling cattle truck conditions - babies and mothers, the elderly, hundreds of others - until Ealing - where there was a gigantic squash for some to disembark, and many more embark. Again this took about 10 minutes. We arrived at Paddington almost an HOUR late. Again no apology - no-one to complain to - no apology from the driver. As someone remarked is this really 2004. God help us when they reduce the local service even further in December to make way for more over-priced HEX services. (I use the word 'service' with complete sarcasm - FGWL wouldn't know what a service was). SB FGWL, hmmmn. I love the way they launched the service proclaiming that they were going to be so much better than Thames Trains when I, as a daily commuter between Ealing Broadway and Paddington, have seen the service reduced to ridiculously poor levels. I see on-board posters "boasting" of improved services - I'm not quite sure how they worked that out; more than a little bit of wishful thinking.. Lately there have been on-board posters stating "no-one likes a dirty train" and talks about how they are deep cleaning all of the trains. This would be a great idea if they could actually get the basics of running a train company correct in the first place - i.e. an efficient on-time service.. Surely the majority of the staff are the same now as when they were Thames Trains so what has happened...? The new timetable launches on 12th December - if this makes things better than they are now then they will proclaim that as a great success story. In my opinion, things would have to greatly improve to even be on par with the service offered by Thames Trains this time last year. Regarding the new timetable, has anyone noticed that they claim the new timetable will make more space on the track for a new stopping service between Paddington and Heathrow BUT that this will not be introduced until Spring '05... great so from December 12 to "Spring '05" are we going to be running at an even lower capacity than normal? Anyway, moaning over, except to say that I think we should start a campaign to ban them from using the word "great" in their company name. -- Ant May |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Huge" wrote in message ... (S.Byers) writes: .... at putting hundreds at risk. The 11.53 today (Sunday) ex-Hayes to Paddington FGWL strain arrived - well eventually - fully 25 minutes late - but packed to the gunnels. It's "gunwhales", BTW. Actually it isn't - it's gunwales. No 'h'. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ant May wrote: Regarding the new timetable, has anyone noticed that they claim the new timetable will make more space on the track for a new stopping service between Paddington and Heathrow BUT that this will not be introduced until Spring '05... great so from December 12 to "Spring '05" are we going to be running at an even lower capacity than normal? The half hourly Paddington-Heathrow service will run from 12 December but only as far as Hayes, and will be worked by Class 165s. It will be extended from Hayes to Heathrow next Spring when the first four 360/2 Desiros are available. The first of these units is already at Old Oak Common. Other services will also be strengthened after 12 December, with more trains formed of two 165/166s instead of one providing more seats. David |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ant May" wrote in message ... Regarding the new timetable, has anyone noticed that they claim the new timetable will make more space on the track for a new stopping service between Paddington and Heathrow BUT that this will not be introduced until Spring '05... great so from December 12 to "Spring '05" are we going to be running at an even lower capacity than normal? Until the new trains for the stopping service to Heathrow are available, FGWL will operate Paddington - Hayes & Harlington trains in the paths set aside for the new service. From 12 December they should be able to alleviate some of the overcrowding, as Adelantes will take over some journeys from Thames Turbo (mainly Oxford and Worcester services), and Chiltern are taking over the Stratford-upon-Avon service, so FGWL will not run north of Banbury. Peter |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Huge wrote:
(S.Byers) writes: The 11.53 today (Sunday) ex-Hayes to Paddington FGWL strain arrived - well eventually - fully 25 minutes late - but packed to the gunnels. It's "gunwhales", BTW. According to the OED it is either "gunwale" or "gunnel" as the original poster spelled it. Of course it additionally lists archaic variant spellings such as the one you used and gonne walle, gunwayle, gunwaile, gun-wall, gun(n)al, and gunhill. -- Michael Hoffman |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thames Link Progress - Or Lack Of It | London Transport | |||
Pedicabs: a public nuisance on the public highway | London Transport | |||
London's next public transport link: Emirates Air Line | London Transport | |||
MAJOR Disruption at Slough on FGW | London Transport | |||
FIRST GREAT WESTERN LINK WORSE THAN THAMES STRAINS | London Transport |