London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Frequent service maps... (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/2685-frequent-service-maps.html)

Dan Gravell January 20th 05 10:34 AM

Frequent service maps...
 
wrote:
...have begun appearing in certain tube stations in place of the London
Connections map.

I appluad the sentiment (and was pleasantly surprised by how much of
the south London network qualifies), but isn't there anyway they could
be made both clearer and less ugly? Perhaps by using a different colour
for each London terminal (and Thameslink), and use broken lines instead
of less bold ones for infrequent services. Then those routes qualifying
for the map because of services to two stations (the Bexleyheath line,
for example) could be shown by running two sets of broken lines
together to form a whole one.
Idle thoughts on a weekday afternoon, I know.


I still think their waterline should be at least eight trains an hour.
Four is not frequent.

Dan

[email protected] January 20th 05 11:59 AM

Frequent service maps...
 
I'd advocate six, but I think 8 is unrealistic - major stations aside
(East Croydon, Wimbledon etc) how many routes have 8tph?

Jonn


Paul Cummins January 20th 05 12:26 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
In article . com,
() wrote:

I'd advocate six, but I think 8 is unrealistic - major stations aside
(East Croydon, Wimbledon etc) how many routes have 8tph?


London Bridge to Forest Hill and return - 12TPH.

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981

Dan Gravell January 20th 05 12:30 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
wrote:
I'd advocate six, but I think 8 is unrealistic - major stations aside
(East Croydon, Wimbledon etc) how many routes have 8tph?


Put simply - build them. You're right that few have 8tph, but the
setting of the waterline at four seems more a decision based on
marketing than it does the semantics of the word "frequent".

Dan

Dave Arquati January 20th 05 01:04 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
Dan Gravell wrote:
wrote:

I'd advocate six, but I think 8 is unrealistic - major stations aside
(East Croydon, Wimbledon etc) how many routes have 8tph?


Put simply - build them. You're right that few have 8tph, but the
setting of the waterline at four seems more a decision based on
marketing than it does the semantics of the word "frequent".


I think a 15 minute interval is just enough to qualify - after all,
given that the average wait should be 7.5mins, that's just enough time
at the big terminals to buy a ticket and find the platform if you're
unfamilar with the place.

4tph is also the off-peak frequency to London at Richmond, Ealing
Broadway (District) and Rickmansworth outwards. I accept that that's a
small proportion of stations.

It is interesting that 6tph is "standard" offpeak Tube frequency on
outer London Tube services like the Central line's West Ruislip branch
or the Piccadilly's Rayners Lane branch, whereas 4tph is deemed
sufficient on National Rail, even at inner London stations like
Loughborough Junction, Streatham Hill, Deptford and St Johns.

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Tom Anderson January 20th 05 03:56 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:

Dan Gravell wrote:
wrote:

I'd advocate six, but I think 8 is unrealistic - major stations aside
(East Croydon, Wimbledon etc) how many routes have 8tph?


Put simply - build them. You're right that few have 8tph, but the
setting of the waterline at four seems more a decision based on
marketing than it does the semantics of the word "frequent".


I think a 15 minute interval is just enough to qualify - after all,
given that the average wait should be 7.5mins, that's just enough time
at the big terminals to buy a ticket and find the platform if you're
unfamilar with the place.


I think worst-case time is more important than average - i want to know
i'm not going to have to wait longer than a given time.

4tph is also the off-peak frequency to London at Richmond, Ealing
Broadway (District) and Rickmansworth outwards. I accept that that's a
small proportion of stations.


Basically, where NR and LU share (how about the Bakerloo?) - it should be
banned!

And no, Ealing Broadway isn't shared, but that's not important right now.

It is interesting that 6tph is "standard" offpeak Tube frequency on
outer London Tube services like the Central line's West Ruislip branch
or the Piccadilly's Rayners Lane branch, whereas 4tph is deemed
sufficient on National Rail, even at inner London stations like
Loughborough Junction, Streatham Hill, Deptford and St Johns.


This must be some new meaning of the word 'interesting' of which i was not
previously aware - a synonym for 'criminal', i take it :).

Add most of the West Anglia line that list (not Hackney Downs or Tottenham
Hale, though) - in fact, i think it's even less above Hackney (Cambridge
Heath etc).

6 tph should be the benchmark for 'frequent' service. 8 tph should be an
aspiration. 4 tph is absurd.

Also, those six trains should be evenly spaced. Perhaps the rule should
actaually be no more than 10 min between departures; 6 evenly-spaced tph
would satisfy this, but 8 tph would be needed if they weren't even.

Oh, and the map should deal with the multiple-destinations problem by
treating services to different destinations as separate lines; i don't
think a station on two infrequent lines should be count as frequently
served, but i don't think it's entirely clear.

tom

--
Socialism - straight in the mainline!


Peter Smyth January 20th 05 05:36 PM

Frequent service maps...
 

"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
...
Dan Gravell wrote:
wrote:

I'd advocate six, but I think 8 is unrealistic - major stations aside
(East Croydon, Wimbledon etc) how many routes have 8tph?


Put simply - build them. You're right that few have 8tph, but the setting
of the waterline at four seems more a decision based on marketing than it
does the semantics of the word "frequent".


I think a 15 minute interval is just enough to qualify - after all, given
that the average wait should be 7.5mins, that's just enough time at the
big terminals to buy a ticket and find the platform if you're unfamilar
with the place.

4tph is also the off-peak frequency to London at Richmond, Ealing Broadway
(District) and Rickmansworth outwards. I accept that that's a small
proportion of stations.


Richmond and Ealing Broadway both have 6tph off-peak. Rickmansworth -
Amersham has 6tph if you include the Chilterns. The only stations of LU with
less than 6tph are Chesham (2tph), Woodford-Hainault (3tph), Kensington
Olympia and Mill Hill East (4tph), New Cross and New Cross Gate (5tph each).

Peter Smyth



Dave Arquati January 20th 05 06:41 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
Peter Smyth wrote:
"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
...

Dan Gravell wrote:

wrote:


I'd advocate six, but I think 8 is unrealistic - major stations aside
(East Croydon, Wimbledon etc) how many routes have 8tph?

Put simply - build them. You're right that few have 8tph, but the setting
of the waterline at four seems more a decision based on marketing than it
does the semantics of the word "frequent".


I think a 15 minute interval is just enough to qualify - after all, given
that the average wait should be 7.5mins, that's just enough time at the
big terminals to buy a ticket and find the platform if you're unfamilar
with the place.

4tph is also the off-peak frequency to London at Richmond, Ealing Broadway
(District) and Rickmansworth outwards. I accept that that's a small
proportion of stations.



Richmond and Ealing Broadway both have 6tph off-peak. Rickmansworth -
Amersham has 6tph if you include the Chilterns. The only stations of LU with
less than 6tph are Chesham (2tph), Woodford-Hainault (3tph), Kensington
Olympia and Mill Hill East (4tph), New Cross and New Cross Gate (5tph each).


My apologies about Richmond and Ealing - I didn't check beforehand. But
Rickmansworth only has 4tph direct to central London between 10am and
3pm weekdays, including the Chilterns - Met departures are at xx00 and
xx30, Chilterns at xx10 and xx40.


--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Peter Smyth January 20th 05 07:00 PM

Frequent service maps...
 

"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
...

4tph is also the off-peak frequency to London at Richmond, Ealing
Broadway (District) and Rickmansworth outwards. I accept that that's a
small proportion of stations.



Richmond and Ealing Broadway both have 6tph off-peak. Rickmansworth -
Amersham has 6tph if you include the Chilterns. The only stations of LU
with less than 6tph are Chesham (2tph), Woodford-Hainault (3tph),
Kensington Olympia and Mill Hill East (4tph), New Cross and New Cross
Gate (5tph each).


My apologies about Richmond and Ealing - I didn't check beforehand. But
Rickmansworth only has 4tph direct to central London between 10am and 3pm
weekdays, including the Chilterns - Met departures are at xx00 and xx30,
Chilterns at xx10 and xx40.


You must be looking at an out of date timetable. It has been 4+2tph for at
least a year - see
http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/first...oundWTT318.pdf

Looking further I see that the TfL Interactive Map http://map.tfl.gov.uk
gives the times you quote from a timetable poster dated 29/09/02. In fact
none of the timetables on the map seem to have been updated for some time.

Peter Smyth



Peter Smyth January 20th 05 07:47 PM

Frequent service maps...
 

"Paul Cummins" wrote in message
.. .
In article . com,
() wrote:

I'd advocate six, but I think 8 is unrealistic - major stations aside
(East Croydon, Wimbledon etc) how many routes have 8tph?


London Bridge to Forest Hill and return - 12TPH.


How do you work that out? Seems to be 6 to me, 2 to Victoria via Crystal
Palace, 2 to Caterham and 2 to Sutton.

Peter Smyth



Paul Cummins January 20th 05 10:01 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
In article ,
(Peter Smyth) wrote:

How do you work that out? Seems to be 6 to me, 2 to Victoria via
Crystal Palace, 2 to Caterham and 2 to Sutton.


Then 6 to London Brodge as well...

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981

Dave Arquati January 20th 05 10:19 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
Paul Cummins wrote:
In article ,
(Peter Smyth) wrote:


How do you work that out? Seems to be 6 to me, 2 to Victoria via
Crystal Palace, 2 to Caterham and 2 to Sutton.



Then 6 to London Brodge as well...


It's a bit silly to count both directions... not many people turn up at
a station and get on the first train that's going anywhere.

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Dave Arquati January 20th 05 10:30 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
Peter Smyth wrote:
"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
...


4tph is also the off-peak frequency to London at Richmond, Ealing
Broadway (District) and Rickmansworth outwards. I accept that that's a
small proportion of stations.


Richmond and Ealing Broadway both have 6tph off-peak. Rickmansworth -
Amersham has 6tph if you include the Chilterns. The only stations of LU
with less than 6tph are Chesham (2tph), Woodford-Hainault (3tph),
Kensington Olympia and Mill Hill East (4tph), New Cross and New Cross
Gate (5tph each).


My apologies about Richmond and Ealing - I didn't check beforehand. But
Rickmansworth only has 4tph direct to central London between 10am and 3pm
weekdays, including the Chilterns - Met departures are at xx00 and xx30,
Chilterns at xx10 and xx40.



You must be looking at an out of date timetable. It has been 4+2tph for at
least a year - see
http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/first...oundWTT318.pdf

Looking further I see that the TfL Interactive Map http://map.tfl.gov.uk
gives the times you quote from a timetable poster dated 29/09/02. In fact
none of the timetables on the map seem to have been updated for some time.


That's where I was. The newer frequency is a pretty good boost.

It's quite impressive that at only 8 stations out of 275 do you have to
wait more than 10 minutes for a train.

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Tom Anderson January 20th 05 11:32 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:

Paul Cummins wrote:
In article ,
(Peter Smyth) wrote:

How do you work that out? Seems to be 6 to me, 2 to Victoria via
Crystal Palace, 2 to Caterham and 2 to Sutton.


Then 6 to London Brodge as well...


It's a bit silly to count both directions... not many people turn up at
a station and get on the first train that's going anywhere.


Except at termini. And Penge.

tom

--
Michael Jackson had that idea back in the 80s. There was even a ride at Disneyland.


Dave Arquati January 21st 05 03:28 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:


Paul Cummins wrote:

In article ,
(Peter Smyth) wrote:


How do you work that out? Seems to be 6 to me, 2 to Victoria via
Crystal Palace, 2 to Caterham and 2 to Sutton.

Then 6 to London Brodge as well...


It's a bit silly to count both directions... not many people turn up at
a station and get on the first train that's going anywhere.



Except at termini. And Penge.


I'm not going to turn up at Victoria and get on the first train that's
going anywhere. I might be innocently trying to get to Wandsworth Road,
and end up in Brighton instead.

Why do you get on the first train at Penge? Is Penge really so bad you
want to escape as soon as possible? :-)

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Tom Anderson January 21st 05 04:11 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:

Tom Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:

Paul Cummins wrote:

In article ,
(Peter Smyth) wrote:

How do you work that out? Seems to be 6 to me, 2 to Victoria via
Crystal Palace, 2 to Caterham and 2 to Sutton.

Then 6 to London Brodge as well...

It's a bit silly to count both directions... not many people turn up at
a station and get on the first train that's going anywhere.


Except at termini. And Penge.


I'm not going to turn up at Victoria and get on the first train that's
going anywhere.


I was thinking of tube termini (Walthamstow, Cockfosters, etc), where
there's only one direction - i did express it rather badly, though. And
places like Morden and Uxbridge don't work anyway.

Why do you get on the first train at Penge? Is Penge really so bad you
want to escape as soon as possible? :-)


Yes.

tom

--
In Milan, [traffic lights] are instructions, in Rome suggestions, and in Naples Christmas decorations. -- James Dowden


[email protected] January 22nd 05 04:05 PM

Frequent service maps...
 

I think a 15 minute interval is just enough to qualify - after all,
given that the average wait should be 7.5mins, that's just enough

time
at the big terminals to buy a ticket and find the platform if

you're
unfamilar with the place.


I think worst-case time is more important than average - i want to

know
i'm not going to have to wait longer than a given time.


In Putney theres a sign advertising up to 6 trains per hour (off peak)
to Waterloo. Thats fine except on a Sunday when all 6 trains leave
between ten to and twenty past


Paul Terry January 22nd 05 05:43 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
In message .com,
writes

In Putney theres a sign advertising up to 6 trains per hour (off peak)
to Waterloo.


Its often much more than that (according to the TFL map mentioned near
the start of this thread, Putney has a daytime service of 10 trains an
hour to Waterloo and the SWT timetable says every 5-8 minutes).

It must be more than 6 during weekday off-peaks (which is the main
measure) since there are 2 Kingston loopers, 2 ex-Staines, 2 Hounslow
loopers and 2 Windsor fasts - there are also Reading fasts, although
some don't stop at Putney off-peak, AFAIR.

Thats fine except on a Sunday when all 6 trains leave between ten to
and twenty past


According to the timetable they are typically 2, 14, 19, 32, 48 and 56
minutes past - but Sunday travel is often disrupted by engineering, and
especially on that line at present.

I don't particularly want to defend the often ghastly SWT, but the
services on the Richmond line are actually very good in the main - I
often use it in preference to the overcrowded Piccadilly line.

--
Paul Terry

Tom Anderson January 22nd 05 09:51 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
On 22 Jan 2005 wrote:

I think a 15 minute interval is just enough to qualify - after all,
given that the average wait should be 7.5mins, that's just enough
time at the big terminals to buy a ticket and find the platform if
you're unfamilar with the place.


I think worst-case time is more important than average - i want to
know i'm not going to have to wait longer than a given time.


In Putney theres a sign advertising up to 6 trains per hour (off peak)
to Waterloo. Thats fine except on a Sunday when all 6 trains leave
between ten to and twenty past


Bingo. A heinous act of schedulecrime.

tom

--
if you can't beat them, build them


Colin Rosenstiel January 25th 05 11:30 AM

Frequent service maps...
 
In article , (Dave Arquati)
wrote:

It's quite impressive that at only 8 stations out of 275 do you have to
wait more than 10 minutes for a train.


In theory at least!

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Clive Coleman January 25th 05 03:39 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
In message , Paul Terry
writes
hats fine except on a Sunday when all 6 trains leave between ten to
and twenty past

Our rush hour merits a train every two hours, that being a single
carriage, I wish I had your problems, I could save myself a bomb taking
my car off of the road.
--
Clive.

Paul Terry January 25th 05 06:54 PM

Frequent service maps...
 
In message , Clive Coleman
writes

In message , Paul Terry
writes


hats fine except on a Sunday when all 6 trains leave between ten to
and twenty past


Our rush hour merits a train every two hours, that being a single
carriage, I wish I had your problems,


Nope, you have misquoted ... someone else wrote that.

I have no rush-hour problems - mainly because I work from home, but even
if I didn't the rush-hour service interval of more than one bus a minute
in these parts (and ample trains) would ensure that I have no real
complaint about public transport.

--
Paul Terry


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk