Chiltern vs the Central line
 

One might think that a journey from the outskirts of London into the
centre would be quickest via a fast National Rail operator, like c2c vs
the District line from Upminster into the City.

I made a journey from High Wycombe into Kensington last week. Usually I
take a train into Marylebone, then either use Bakerloo+ Circle,
Bakerloo+Piccadilly or Circle from Edgware Road to reach Gloucester
Road, taking about an hour and a quarter in total.

However, this time, I only had a ticket between Wycombe and South
Ruislip, having used the Tube to reach Ruislip on the outward journey as
I started at Holland Park earlier in the day. The bonus of using the
Tube from South Ruislip is the cheap Oyster fare in the offpeak.

I definitely didn't expect to travel from Wycombe to Gloucester Road in
almost exactly an hour. It turns out that the Central is very quick from
Ruislip to Notting Hill Gate (23 mins), only a few minutes more than the
time it takes any Chiltern train stopping at Ruislip to reach Marylebone
(20 mins minimum). Obviously this is advantageous in reaching western areas.

This doesn't really apply to the faster trains which skip the Ruislips -
but even an ideal scenario with a non-stop train (usually taking around
33 mins) from Wycombe to Marylebone, followed by a 5-min walk and a
Circle journey from Edgware Road (13 mins) gets you to Gloucester Road
in 51 minutes.

Although my hour-only journey via the Central line involved just a
minute's wait at both South Ruislip and Notting Hill Gate, it also
involves a tortuous interchange at Notting Hill and, in this case, an
all-stations train from Wycombe (including a stop at the fantastic
Denham Golf Club).

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:

One might think that a journey from the outskirts of London into the
centre would be quickest via a fast National Rail operator,
^^^^^^

I made a journey from High Wycombe into Kensington last week.
^^^^^^^^^^

Dave, are we going to have to go over this again? :)

I definitely didn't expect to travel from Wycombe to Gloucester Road in
almost exactly an hour.

Sit down with a map - a real map, not Mr Beck's filthy propaganda - and
have a look at the routes. The surprisingly fast route is also
surprisingly direct!

I take your point, though - by rights, a non-stop train from Ruislip to
Marylebone should be faster than a stopper to Notting Hill. The Central is
a bit of a speed demon, but i suspect the problem is really that the
Chiltern trains are a bit slow. I have no idea why; probably some line
speed thing, or else complications arising from congestion.

(including a stop at the fantastic Denham Golf Club).

Do expand on that.

tom

--
Michael Jackson had that idea back in the 80s. There was even a ride at Disneyland.

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

Dave Arquati wrote:
One might think that a journey from the outskirts of London into the
centre would be quickest via a fast National Rail operator, like c2c vs
the District line from Upminster into the City.
[snip]

I used to travel from Hayes (Hillingdon) to Imperial College by a bus to
Hayes & Harlington, Thames Trains to Paddington, then Circle round to
Gloucester Road. Not only did this exclude me from student fares at the
time, it also meant travelling into Zone 1 and having to tolerate the
Circle.

About 18 months ago I switched to a bus to Northolt, tube to Notting
Hill Gate and then a 52 or 70 to Imperial (the 70 dropping me off right
outside). Not only did it cut my journey time by 15-30 minutes both
ways, it also means I never enter Zone 1 except by bus, halving the
amount I was paying on travel (as I became eligible for student fares as
well).

I considered the Circle from NHG to GR, but it takes so long that it's
really not worth it, particularly as I'd have to walk from GR and it
costs a lot more.

I've found the Central Line fantastically fast and have had very few
problems with it - frozen brakes on a train on the way to an exam was
probably the most problematic, but I still got there in time!

--
Ashley Brown
Serial Lurker
Also Imperial College, SW7

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

Tom Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:


One might think that a journey from the outskirts of London into the
centre would be quickest via a fast National Rail operator,
^^^^^^

I made a journey from High Wycombe into Kensington last week.
^^^^^^^^^^

Dave, are we going to have to go over this again? :)

Oh dear, not this old chestnut... you'll just have to accept that Dave's
definition of Central London is Zone 1 :-)

I'm having flashbacks to the whole "Metropolitan Kent" argument.

I definitely didn't expect to travel from Wycombe to Gloucester Road in
almost exactly an hour.

Sit down with a map - a real map, not Mr Beck's filthy propaganda - and
have a look at the routes. The surprisingly fast route is also
surprisingly direct!

Yes, should have thought of that... it happens to be extremely similar
to the route I take on the rare occasion that I drive it (Western Avenue
then either West Cross + Cromwell Road or Westway + Hyde Park).

But then again, the direct route is not necessarily the fastest
(especially when Chiltern makes a maximum of 4 intermediate stops, but
the Central makes 9).

I take your point, though - by rights, a non-stop train from Ruislip to
Marylebone should be faster than a stopper to Notting Hill. The Central is
a bit of a speed demon, but i suspect the problem is really that the
Chiltern trains are a bit slow. I have no idea why; probably some line
speed thing, or else complications arising from congestion.

Sometimes they sit outside Marylebone for a bit, but I don't think
that's the main problem - line speed between Northolt Junction and
Neasden seems to be a bit slow.

(including a stop at the fantastic Denham Golf Club).

Do expand on that.

The king of Chiltern's rural stations. I've never seen anyone get on or
off there - not even with any golf clubs. I reckon most people
travelling to Denham Golf Club do so by BMW rather than Chiltern Turbo
(although the latter has more plentiful room for one's clubs).

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

Ashley Brown wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote:

One might think that a journey from the outskirts of London into the
centre would be quickest via a fast National Rail operator, like c2c
vs the District line from Upminster into the City.

[snip]

I used to travel from Hayes (Hillingdon) to Imperial College by a bus to
Hayes & Harlington, Thames Trains to Paddington, then Circle round to
Gloucester Road. Not only did this exclude me from student fares at the
time, it also meant travelling into Zone 1 and having to tolerate the
Circle.

About 18 months ago I switched to a bus to Northolt, tube to Notting
Hill Gate and then a 52 or 70 to Imperial (the 70 dropping me off right
outside). Not only did it cut my journey time by 15-30 minutes both
ways, it also means I never enter Zone 1 except by bus, halving the
amount I was paying on travel (as I became eligible for student fares as
well).

I considered the Circle from NHG to GR, but it takes so long that it's
really not worth it, particularly as I'd have to walk from GR and it
costs a lot more.

This is only a trip I make every few weeks so it's not too much of an
issue for me (the off-peak fare would be 10p extra if I got off at NHG
and took the bus), and I wasn't travelling to College itself anyway. But
for a regular journey it's certainly a good idea.

I even wrote a brief article for the student paper about why the Circle
line is so crap (amongst other things).

I've found the Central Line fantastically fast and have had very few
problems with it - frozen brakes on a train on the way to an exam was
probably the most problematic, but I still got there in time!

I presume the automatic train operation on the Central helps speed up
journey times a bit.


--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

In article , Dave Arquati
writes
(including a stop at the fantastic Denham Golf Club).
Do expand on that.
The king of Chiltern's rural stations. I've never seen anyone get on or
off there - not even with any golf clubs.

I did once. SWMBO was driving from Cambridge to meet me before we
continued to Bristol. I walked through the golf course and associated
open spaces to meet her just off the A40. On a nice day it's a nice
walk.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

Dave Arquati wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote:

Do expand on that.

The king of Chiltern's rural stations. I've never seen anyone get on
or
off there - not even with any golf clubs. I reckon most people
travelling to Denham Golf Club do so by BMW rather than Chiltern
Turbo
(although the latter has more plentiful room for one's clubs).

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

It is eleven years since I last travelled the GC/GW joint. Is the
Pagoda still at Denham Golf Club?

A.

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

Adrian Auer-Hudson wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote:

Tom Anderson wrote:


Do expand on that.

The king of Chiltern's rural stations. I've never seen anyone get on

or

off there - not even with any golf clubs. I reckon most people
travelling to Denham Golf Club do so by BMW rather than Chiltern

Turbo

(although the latter has more plentiful room for one's clubs).

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London


It is eleven years since I last travelled the GC/GW joint. Is the
Pagoda still at Denham Golf Club?

A.

Yup. I don't think anything's really changed at Denham Golf Club in the
last 100-ish years.

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

snip

http://therailwaystationgallery.foto...t/c126732.html
RPM has pictures of Denham Golf Club that show the pagoda.

Chiltern vs the Central line
 

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:

Tom Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Dave Arquati wrote:


One might think that a journey from the outskirts of London into the
centre would be quickest via a fast National Rail operator,
^^^^^^

I made a journey from High Wycombe into Kensington last week.
^^^^^^^^^^

Dave, are we going to have to go over this again? :)

Oh dear, not this old chestnut... you'll just have to accept that Dave's
definition of Central London is Zone 1 :-)

I'm having flashbacks to the whole "Metropolitan Kent" argument.

I think we did Essex a bit before that.

Still, correct definitions are important, and, moreover, this group
collects argumentative pedants like uk.local.london collects raving
lunatics.

(including a stop at the fantastic Denham Golf Club).

Do expand on that.

The king of Chiltern's rural stations. I've never seen anyone get on or
off there - not even with any golf clubs. I reckon most people
travelling to Denham Golf Club do so by BMW rather than Chiltern Turbo
(although the latter has more plentiful room for one's clubs).

Why on earth does this station exist? Why does it *still* exist?

tom

--
I see large and small words on this page, arranged in long rows separated by little dotty characters. Suspect written by little dotty characters, too. -- RonJeffries