Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "TheOneKEA" wrote in message oups.com... Brimstone wrote: All of which can be overcome, especially the loading gauge question. I don't see tube stock clouting any of the bridges. between Ealing Bdy and West Ealing. WRT to speeds, 92 stock accelerates quicker than anything on the mainline and it's only travelling about three- quaters of a mile anyway. It's not a matter of the tube trains hitting lineside structures, it's a matter of what you're going to use to get a defective 1992TS off of the line when it can't move itself... What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch or a l65 on the Amersham line? |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tom Anderson wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, PaulBowery wrote: What about this for an idea- combine the Greenford branch and Barking to Gospel Oak into a single service via Ealing Broadway and Willesden Junction. This would provide an interchange between the North London Line and the west via Ealing Broadway. If paths in the Willesden Junction area are a problem then some of the Stratford trains could run to Willesden Junction low level via Queens Park. I do think killing the service to Paddington, or anywhere similarly central, would be a bit fatal. How about making the branch part of the Central Line? You'd need about a mile of four-tracking to get to the junction from Ealing Broadway; would that be at all feasible? tom Operationally converting the branch to be a Central Line extension makes sense. The question is: Would the construction costs be justified? Adrian. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() One doubts the Health and Safety folks would allow any new cases of tube and mainline interlining. A. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brimstone wrote:
What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch or a l65 on the Amersham line? Somebody probably goes and finds a barrier coach. The DC lines once had them to allow standard stock to mate with Oerlikons, to allow the latter to push the former out of the way. I haven't a clue what they use nowadays. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "TheOneKEA" wrote in message ups.com... Brimstone wrote: What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch or a l65 on the Amersham line? Somebody probably goes and finds a barrier coach. The DC lines once had them to allow standard stock to mate with Oerlikons, to allow the latter to push the former out of the way. I haven't a clue what they use nowadays. Probably nothing as methods of dealing with failed trains have developed. It's extremely rare that an EMU can't be got moving under it's own power albeit on reduced power. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Adrian Auer-Hudson" wrote in message oups.com... One doubts the Health and Safety folks would allow any new cases of tube and mainline interlining. The HSE won't have railways as part of their remit for much longer. Hopefully sanity will return. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brimstone wrote:
"TheOneKEA" wrote in message oups.com... Brimstone wrote: All of which can be overcome, especially the loading gauge question. I don't see tube stock clouting any of the bridges. between Ealing Bdy and West Ealing. WRT to speeds, 92 stock accelerates quicker than anything on the mainline and it's only travelling about three- quaters of a mile anyway. It's not a matter of the tube trains hitting lineside structures, it's a matter of what you're going to use to get a defective 1992TS off of the line when it can't move itself... What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch Battery loco from Lillie Bridge or Acton Town? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard J." wrote in message . uk... Brimstone wrote: "TheOneKEA" wrote in message oups.com... Brimstone wrote: All of which can be overcome, especially the loading gauge question. I don't see tube stock clouting any of the bridges. between Ealing Bdy and West Ealing. WRT to speeds, 92 stock accelerates quicker than anything on the mainline and it's only travelling about three- quaters of a mile anyway. It's not a matter of the tube trains hitting lineside structures, it's a matter of what you're going to use to get a defective 1992TS off of the line when it can't move itself... What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch Battery loco from Lillie Bridge or Acton Town? The control systems on a D can be split in half, so that if there is a failure on one the other can get the train back to depot. Even on LU metals the need for an assisting train is extremely rare and only due to a catastrophic failure. |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barry Salter wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:15:31 +1030, (Aidan Stanger) wrote: The GOBLIN has a far greater potential as a light rail route. And what would you propose doing with the substantial freight traffic along the route should such a conversion come to fruition? Using the NLL. From Camden to Dalston track space isn't a problem - indeed it was once 4 track and could easily be again. From Dalston to Stratford adding another track would be a bit more difficult, but could still be done without any demolishion (apart from one industrial building near the Lea). The work could be combined with the upgrading of that stretch of NLL to become part of Crossrail 2. If Crossrail 1 can take over the WCML Slow lines (which would provide an alternative route into London so attractive that it would enable boarding and alighting restrictions between Euston and Watford Junction to be lifted) then it would provide a dedicated freight route from Stratford to Euston. Linking it with the LTS would be harder (probably requiring a short tunnel to link it with the E end of the GOBLIN) but the resulting line woudl not only free up the GOBLIN for tram conversion but also provide a much more direct dedicated freight route. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian Auer-Hudson wrote:
Operationally converting the [Greenford] branch to be a Central Line extension makes sense. The question is: Would the construction costs be justified? And which end do you connect it at? Though a loop at both ends has its attractions from an aesthetic point of view! If tube tunnels were dug between West Ealing and just east of Ealing Broadway, it would free up surface capacity at Ealing Broadway station for the desperately-needed rebuilding. There are endless options, and I think a wholesale reorganisation of services might be beneficial, because - the area needs north-south rail services - the line parallel to the Central line is ridiculously under-used - passengers beyond Northolt are not best served by an all-stations service - The Ealing Broadway Central Line branch will lose most of its passengers to Crossrail I'm thinking maybe a much enhanced Chiltern service from the Ruislips, and new Central Line branches closer in: West Ealing via Castlebar Park, and maybe something heading north into Park Royal. Colin McKenzie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Greenford | London Transport | |||
PAYG Ealing Broadway - Greenford | London Transport | |||
Sightseeing in Greenford | London Transport | |||
Trackbashers alert ( was Greenford Branch - two collisions today?) | London Transport | |||
Parking near Greenford | London Transport |