Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last night some bright spark at Brent Cross had set all the gates to
enter only, they all displayed no exit. Fortunately the side gate hadn't been locked. What happens to people with Oyster cards in this situation. Kevin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just was well it was unlocked then.
Kevin |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kat typed
wrote: Last night some bright spark at Brent Cross had set all the gates to enter only, they all displayed no exit. Fortunately the side gate hadn't been locked. What happens to people with Oyster cards in this situation. They should use the Oyster reader by the manual gate. Except this sometimes *still* results in an 'incomplete journey'... -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can someone explain why the gates being closed for exit when the side
gate was open is a breach of safety? Barry Salter wrote: On 19 Apr 2005 00:14:06 -0700, wrote: Last night some bright spark at Brent Cross had set all the gates to enter only, they all displayed no exit. Odd...I was under the impression that the bare minimum of gates was specified as 1 entry, 1 exit, 1 reversible; and I believe this is/was the arrangement at Bow Road, for example. I stand for correction on this matter, but I do find it *very* hard to believe that there wasn't at *least* one gate available for exit (unless, for some reason, the 'fixed' exit gate had failed). Cheers, Barry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barry Salter wrote:
On 19 Apr 2005 00:14:06 -0700, wrote: Last night some bright spark at Brent Cross had set all the gates to enter only, they all displayed no exit. Odd...I was under the impression that the bare minimum of gates was specified as 1 entry, 1 exit, 1 reversible; and I believe this is/was the arrangement at Bow Road, for example. I stand for correction on this matter, but I do find it *very* hard to believe that there wasn't at *least* one gate available for exit (unless, for some reason, the 'fixed' exit gate had failed). Some have their preferences and are used to working in one direction only but in theory electronic gates can be set open, closed, entry or exit. -- Kat |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() General Von Clinkerhoffen wrote: Can someone explain why the gates being closed for exit when the side gate was open is a breach of safety? At a guess the amount of people specified in the 'fire capacity' cannont be evacuated quickly enough through only the side gate. Also, if the gate is unlocked but closed, how does one know to try it? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barry Salter typed
On 19 Apr 2005 00:14:06 -0700, wrote: Last night some bright spark at Brent Cross had set all the gates to enter only, they all displayed no exit. Odd...I was under the impression that the bare minimum of gates was specified as 1 entry, 1 exit, 1 reversible; and I believe this is/was the arrangement at Bow Road, for example. I stand for correction on this matter, but I do find it *very* hard to believe that there wasn't at *least* one gate available for exit (unless, for some reason, the 'fixed' exit gate had failed). I don't find this *at all* difficult to believe. Burnt Oak had all its gates set to 'exit' a few weeks ago. The situation *might* have changed after I tried to sort out some incomplete journeys on my, and my partner's, Oyster Prepay cards. Wecomplained loudly at another station about the situation at Burnt Oak... I won't have the problem now I have my Freedom Pass ;-) -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris! wrote:
At a guess the amount of people specified in the 'fire capacity' cannont be evacuated quickly enough through only the side gate. Do the gates not all automatically open in the event of a fire alarm signal? We operate a restricted entry system at work, and several days was spent testing that they would open in the event of an alarm being triggered. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris wrote:
Chris! wrote: At a guess the amount of people specified in the 'fire capacity' cannont be evacuated quickly enough through only the side gate. Do the gates not all automatically open in the event of a fire alarm signal? We operate a restricted entry system at work, and several days was spent testing that they would open in the event of an alarm being triggered. They should do. I've been in the ticket hall (at Stepney Green, as it happens) when an Inspector Sands announcement turned into an evacuation, and as soon as the evacuation announcement started all the gates opened automatically. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Drilling breach into F Park - Moorgate tunnels | London Transport | |||
Oxford Street trams - again - again | London Transport | |||
Unions to decide safety inspections on LUL track? | London Transport | |||
the quest for safety | London Transport |