![]() |
Jubilee Line Closure
On 26 May 2005 21:45:07 GMT, Adrian wrote:
Presumably to protect against a situation where the JLE doors "think" it's a long train, but it isn't. Good point, hadn't thought of the PEDs. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
Jubilee Line Closure
"Paul Weaver" wrote in message ... "Adrian" wrote in message . 244.170... Oh. Hardly peak time. Panic over. Glad I've got a car - if I relied on public transport to get to work It'd be a nightmare. Funnily enough, where I work far more car drivers are late for work than those who come in by PT... -- Cheers, Steve. Change from jealous to sad to reply. |
Jubilee Line Closure
In message , Barry Salter
writes Doesn't really surprise me, especially for those based at Arnos Grove. The North Circ's a nightmare most of the day, and Bowes Road ain't much better...The sooner it gets widened, the better. I thought it had been decided not to actually widen the NCR but to do an assortment of 'improvements' to the various junctions as that would be cheaper? -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
Jubilee Line Closure
In message , Steve
Dulieu writes Funnily enough, where I work far more car drivers are late for work than those who come in by PT... Hah! - you don't call that work ;-) -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
Jubilee Line Closure
"Steve Fitzgerald" ] wrote in message ... In message , Steve Dulieu writes Funnily enough, where I work far more car drivers are late for work than those who come in by PT... Hah! - you don't call that work ;-) Hmmm, good point Steve. OK, funnily enough, where I spend my days in relaxed indolence far more car drivers etc, etc...:-) -- Cheers, Steve. Change from jealous to sad to reply. |
Jubilee Line Closure
Funnily enough, where I work far more car drivers are late for work than
those who come in by PT... I arrived 20 minutes early for work at 11PM last night. Had I gone via train I'd have had to leave 15 minutes earlier and (as it turns out) would have been late. Of course this morning I left at 11:20, and even after stopping for petrol and heavy traffic in chiswich, I was home 20 minutes before I'd have been via the train - assuming a tube to Ealing had turned up on time. How would I get to work (Shepherds Bush) on Boxing Day if I lived at stanmore without a car? Public transport is great for the 9-5 masses, but for the rest of us the complete closures at various weekends means that it's simply not reliable. |
Jubilee Line Closure
Paul Weaver wrote to uk.transport.london on Fri, 27 May 2005:
Funnily enough, where I work far more car drivers are late for work than those who come in by PT... I arrived 20 minutes early for work at 11PM last night. Had I gone via train I'd have had to leave 15 minutes earlier and (as it turns out) would have been late. However, you are only one person. I could give a counter-example, in that it takes my husband approximately 45-50 minutes, door-to-door, going to work by public transport. On the rare occasions he takes the car, it takes him at least 1 1/2 hours. [Snip] How would I get to work (Shepherds Bush) on Boxing Day if I lived at stanmore without a car? Public transport is great for the 9-5 masses, but for the rest of us the complete closures at various weekends means that it's simply not reliable. I think I've missed something here - why would people not use public transport most of the time, but occasionally use the car when they had a good reason to do so, such as PT not running? -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 May 2005 |
Jubilee Line Closure
However, you are only one person. I could give a counter-example, in
that it takes my husband approximately 45-50 minutes, door-to-door, going to work by public transport. On the rare occasions he takes the car, it takes him at least 1 1/2 hours. Why would he take the car? I think I've missed something here - why would people not use public transport most of the time, but occasionally use the car when they had a good reason to do so, such as PT not running? Once you own a car, the cost of a journey collapses dramatically (insurance, tax etc doesnt increase per mile), and ends up below that of P.T. For the majority of the country a car is always faster than P.T. London is a special case, as it's such an overcrowded ********, but even in London its faster offpeak to travel by car. I agree I will subject myself to the train if I have to get into work for some unusual time like 9AM, however those are few and far between (and last time I drove in for arround 9AM - as there were 2 trains an hour peak time when there's normally 6) I went to heathrow, and it ended up faster anyway. |
Jubilee Line Closure
Steve Dulieu wrote:
Funnily enough, where I work far more car drivers are late for work than those who come in by PT... Surely it's those Train Ops who drive in who can use the excuse "sorry I'm late, bl**dy traffic at Staples Corner, Hanger Lane, M1" etc without any expectation that the truth of this can be verified, whereas those using LU services know any such false claims of disruption are far more easily exposed? Thus PT users are more likely to leave for work with time to spare. Call me a cynic ("You're a cynic....") Kim Rennie |
Jubilee Line Closure
Paul Weaver wrote to uk.transport.london on Fri, 27 May 2005:
However, you are only one person. I could give a counter-example, in that it takes my husband approximately 45-50 minutes, door-to-door, going to work by public transport. On the rare occasions he takes the car, it takes him at least 1 1/2 hours. Why would he take the car? If we are going on somewhere after work - most usually, it is more convenient for both of us for him to meet me at the station (not necessarily near his work, often near where we are going) so that we can drive home together afterwards, usually late at night. I think I've missed something here - why would people not use public transport most of the time, but occasionally use the car when they had a good reason to do so, such as PT not running? Once you own a car, the cost of a journey collapses dramatically (insurance, tax etc doesnt increase per mile), and ends up below that of P.T. For the majority of the country a car is always faster than P.T. London is a special case, as it's such an overcrowded ********, but even in London its faster offpeak to travel by car. Depends on when off peak, and where you are going! In the small hours of the morning, I'd be inclined to agree. But at 2.00 or 8.00 pm it can be very slow going. Our car tends to live in the garage and only come out for the occasional evening trip (and the occasions described above, which are not frequent) and on weekend mornings. I agree I will subject myself to the train if I have to get into work for some unusual time like 9AM, however those are few and far between (and last time I drove in for arround 9AM - as there were 2 trains an hour peak time when there's normally 6) I went to heathrow, and it ended up faster anyway. But if you were going to Heathrow to fly on, then it works out more expensive since you have to pay for car parking! There are times it's worth doing that, but not often. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 May 2005 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk