Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
He (Ken Livingstone) added: "Simply bidding for the Games has brought
forward a host of transport improvements - with the East London Line extension, the new £400m ticket hall at King's Cross, and the £91m package of improvements to the North London Line all given added momentum." What are the improvements to the NLL? £91M doesn't seem to by much these days so it can't be much of an improvement. Kevin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe the NLL's forthcoming truncation east of Stratford? (Albeit
replaced by a new DLR branch.) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about some improvements to the South London Line? Reinstating a station
at Brixton (with platform level interchange to the main line) would be a start! -- Regards, Max B Visit me at http://www.thebattens.ndonet.com "Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... wrote: He (Ken Livingstone) added: "Simply bidding for the Games has brought forward a host of transport improvements - with the East London Line extension, the new £400m ticket hall at King's Cross, and the £91m package of improvements to the North London Line all given added momentum." What are the improvements to the NLL? £91M doesn't seem to by much these days so it can't be much of an improvement. It should be for: - signalling enhancements - improved power supply - new "resilience measures" to counter late-running freight services - I think this just means a new/reinstated freight loop - platform extensions for 6-car trains where necessary - frequency doubling to 8tph I'm not sure how they are squeezing the £91m for those measures, but that's what it's for. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0524-0, 13/06/2005 Tested on: 13/06/2005 15:57:48 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
wrote: What are the improvements to the NLL? £91M doesn't seem to by much these days so it can't be much of an improvement. http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/105 -- Mike Bristow - really a very good driver |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MaxB wrote:
What about some improvements to the South London Line? Reinstating a station at Brixton (with platform level interchange to the main line) would be a start! This is being considered as part of the second phase of the East London Line project, but it would cost an absolute fortune; the previous station on the SLL at Brixton was halfway to Loughborough Junction, and constructing new platforms at Brixton itself would be extremely difficult. It would probably cost about £70m just by itself. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And Heaven forbid that we should spend any money south of the river, after
all we have the South Circular to keep us happy (well occupied anyway)! -- Regards, Max Batten Visit me at http://www.thebattens.ndonet.com "Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... MaxB wrote: What about some improvements to the South London Line? Reinstating a station at Brixton (with platform level interchange to the main line) would be a start! This is being considered as part of the second phase of the East London Line project, but it would cost an absolute fortune; the previous station on the SLL at Brixton was halfway to Loughborough Junction, and constructing new platforms at Brixton itself would be extremely difficult. It would probably cost about £70m just by itself. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0524-0, 13/06/2005 Tested on: 13/06/2005 22:59:48 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Arquati wrote: wrote: He (Ken Livingstone) added: "Simply bidding for the Games has brought forward a host of transport improvements - with the East London Line extension, the new £400m ticket hall at King's Cross, and the £91m package of improvements to the North London Line all given added momentum." What are the improvements to the NLL? £91M doesn't seem to by much these days so it can't be much of an improvement. It should be for: - signalling enhancements - improved power supply - new "resilience measures" to counter late-running freight services - I think this just means a new/reinstated freight loop - platform extensions for 6-car trains where necessary - frequency doubling to 8tph I'm not sure how they are squeezing the £91m for those measures, but that's what it's for. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London Are they actually planning to increase the length of trains, where will the extra trains come from, also for increased frequency. Incredible for a line that 30 years ago BR would hve quite happily confined to the waste dump (passenger services anyway). I have always thought the 3 car trains from Euston to Watford Junc needed extra carriages when you see the overcrowding so would have thought that this should take priority over the NLL. Kevin |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: wrote: He (Ken Livingstone) added: "Simply bidding for the Games has brought forward a host of transport improvements - with the East London Line extension, the new £400m ticket hall at King's Cross, and the £91m package of improvements to the North London Line all given added momentum." What are the improvements to the NLL? £91M doesn't seem to by much these days so it can't be much of an improvement. It should be for: - signalling enhancements - improved power supply - new "resilience measures" to counter late-running freight services - I think this just means a new/reinstated freight loop - platform extensions for 6-car trains where necessary - frequency doubling to 8tph I'm not sure how they are squeezing the £91m for those measures, but that's what it's for. Are they actually planning to increase the length of trains, where will the extra trains come from, also for increased frequency. Incredible for a line that 30 years ago BR would hve quite happily confined to the waste dump (passenger services anyway). I have always thought the 3 car trains from Euston to Watford Junc needed extra carriages when you see the overcrowding so would have thought that this should take priority over the NLL. The same could be said about the trains on the WAGN lines. I really don't get Ken's infatuation with the NLL; it's just not serving a corridor with heavy demand, so why give it so much attention? Mind you, 91 million isn't exactly a lot. tom -- I content myself with the Speculative part [...], I care not for the Practick. I seldom bring any thing to use, 'tis not my way. Knowledge is my ultimate end. -- Sir Nicholas Gimcrack |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster product pickup improvements | London Transport | |||
Leyton Station improvements | London Transport | |||
Shepherds Bush Central line station improvements | London Transport | |||
C-charge monitoring shows sustained traffic improvements | London Transport News |