Mornington Crescent
 

In message , Soulbass
writes

"Ian F." wrote in message
...

"Soulbass" wrote in
message ...

Now, can anybody explain 'Nip'?

Are we allowing swiving?

Ian

Ian,

do you mean swiving under the Québécoise/French Canadian rules, Pre '74
Whiting-Bellamy accord rules or open-play swiving?

I understood that swiving was only allowed in a game that started from Blake
Hall, but as that station has been closed for some time and you are still
managing to swiv, think you may find that you are the greatest exponent of
this lost (and by me) much missed art.

(I can dip in and out of this game all day!! I work from home. What's your
excuse?)

Giles


What about Sir Henry Cruns exceptions - if someone can explain it
properly to a newbie like me!

--
Mike Hughes
A Taxi driver licensed for London and Brighton
at home in Tarring, West Sussex, England

Mornington Crescent
 

"Soulbass" wrote in message
...

do you mean swiving under the Québécoise/French Canadian rules, Pre '74
Whiting-Bellamy accord rules or open-play swiving?

Open-play. I'm not sure the others still apply following the publication of
Stovold's Rules and Origins.

I understood that swiving was only allowed in a game that started from
Blake Hall, but as that station has been closed for some time and you are
still managing to swiv, think you may find that you are the greatest
exponent of this lost (and by me) much missed art.

I do my best. ;-)

(I can dip in and out of this game all day!! I work from home. What's your
excuse?)

I work from home! But I'm off out soon, so maybe we should call it quits
now.

Mornington Crescent!

Ian

Mornington Crescent
 

tim (moved to sweden) wrote:
"Ian F." wrote in message
...

"Nick Leverton" wrote in message
...


Waterloo (sunset)!

That has a ring of 'Gruntfuttock's Posture' about it.

Euston Square.



I challenge anyone to prove that you're not making this up as you go along

:-(

tim


Is that a new station on the Docklands Railway?

Mornington Crescent
 

Ian F. wrote:

Mornington Crescent!

Damn.
--
Michael Hoffman

Mornington Crescent
 

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Michael Hoffman wrote:

Ian F. wrote:

Mornington Crescent!

Damn.

That was a good little match, chaps. Funnily enough, the opening was
rather reminiscent of Brooke-Taylor's devastating attack in his match
against IBM's Deep Tube computer back in '99.

tom

--
This isn't right. This isn't even wrong.

Mornington Crescent
 

"Ian F." wrote in message
...
"Soulbass" wrote in
message ...

do you mean swiving under the Québécoise/French Canadian rules, Pre '74
Whiting-Bellamy accord rules or open-play swiving?

Open-play. I'm not sure the others still apply following the publication
of Stovold's Rules and Origins.

I understood that swiving was only allowed in a game that started from
Blake Hall, but as that station has been closed for some time and you are
still managing to swiv, think you may find that you are the greatest
exponent of this lost (and by me) much missed art.

I do my best. ;-)

(I can dip in and out of this game all day!! I work from home. What's
your excuse?)

I work from home! But I'm off out soon, so maybe we should call it quits
now.

Mornington Crescent!

Ian

Mornington Crescent
 

In message , David
Boothroyd writes
Of course we have all heard of the impossibly trendy Farquharson
amendment which treats closed stations as wild.

Therefore I move to:

Holborn Viaduct.

South Kentish Town (Courtesy of the Betjeman variation, obviously).

--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk

Mornington Crescent
 

In message , Soulbass
writes
Pre1974 (and as all experienced players will know) the Whiting-Bellamy
accord was the loophole to get from Euston Square to Southwark in a
Bakerloo line or non-Bakerloo line starting game.

No, that amendment was actually introduced in 1965, to coincide with the
creation of the Greater London Council. It was not widely adopted by
non London players until 1973, when local government reform reached the
rest of England and Wales, finally reaching Scotland with their reforms
in 1974.

--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk

Mornington Crescent
 

In message , Tom
Anderson writes
That was a good little match, chaps. Funnily enough, the opening was
rather reminiscent of Brooke-Taylor's devastating attack in his match
against IBM's Deep Tube computer back in '99.

Tea all over monitor.......

--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk

Mornington Crescent
 

"Ian Jelf" wrote in message
...
In message , Soulbass
writes
Pre1974 (and as all experienced players will know) the Whiting-Bellamy
accord was the loophole to get from Euston Square to Southwark in a
Bakerloo line or non-Bakerloo line starting game.

No, that amendment was actually introduced in 1965, to coincide with the
creation of the Greater London Council. It was not widely adopted by non
London players until 1973, when local government reform reached the rest
of England and Wales, finally reaching Scotland with their reforms in
1974.

--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk

How could I have made such a schoolboy error and committed it to print?!! It
always catches me out that Pre'74 is in fact Post'65 within the old GLC
boundary. Sorry for any confusion caused.

Giles

Mornington Crescent
 

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Ian Jelf wrote:

In message , Tom Anderson
writes

That was a good little match, chaps. Funnily enough, the opening was rather
reminiscent of Brooke-Taylor's devastating attack in his match against
IBM's Deep Tube computer back in '99.

Tea all over monitor.......

Yes, that's the one.

tom

--
[Philosophy] is kind of like being driven behind the sofa by Dr Who - scary, but still entertaining. -- Itchyfidget

Mornington Crescent
 

Now we have the Olympics, will there be a petition to get Mornington
Crescent as an Olympic sport?

Neill

Mornington Crescent
 

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 09:56:35 +0100, Soulbass wrote:

Glad to have been of some service to you.

Now, can anybody explain 'Nip'?

No explanation is needed. Your problem is that you are looking in the
wrong place for the information. Try "knip".

--
http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p12119121.html
(142 043 with a bag over its coupler to keep the snow out, 23 Feb 2005)

Mornington Crescent
 

On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:11:01 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
SheWolf might well have written:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:52:02 -0600, Clark W. Griswold, Jr. wrote:

James Farrar wrote:

If you wish to learn the rules, I suggest you consult a rulebook.

A pointer to such would be very helpful. I've listened to several "Sorry, I
Haven't A Clue" radio programmes and haven't been able to pick it up.

People that can successfully play it have earned my admiration though!

I thought it was last seen under Nyk's sofa?

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

--
/__
\_|\/
/\

Mornington Crescent
 

NJT wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:11:01 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
SheWolf might well have written:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:52:02 -0600, Clark W. Griswold, Jr. wrote:

James Farrar wrote:

If you wish to learn the rules, I suggest you consult a rulebook.

A pointer to such would be very helpful. I've listened to several "Sorry, I
Haven't A Clue" radio programmes and haven't been able to pick it up.

People that can successfully play it have earned my admiration though!

I thought it was last seen under Nyk's sofa?

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

--
HTML-to-text and markup removal with Detagger
http://www.jafsoft.com/detagger/

Mornington Crescent
 

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:57:34 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:
NJT wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:11:01 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
SheWolf might well have written:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:52:02 -0600, Clark W. Griswold, Jr. wrote:

James Farrar wrote:

If you wish to learn the rules, I suggest you consult a rulebook.

A pointer to such would be very helpful. I've listened to several "Sorry, I
Haven't A Clue" radio programmes and haven't been able to pick it up.

People that can successfully play it have earned my admiration though!

I thought it was last seen under Nyk's sofa?

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

--
/__
\_|\/
/\

Mornington Crescent
 

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:34:25 +0100, NJT wrote:


I thought it was last seen under Nyk's sofa?

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

How about using a rule book, I think I've got one somewhere...

Mornington Crescent
 

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat
--
HTML-to-text and markup removal with Detagger
http://www.jafsoft.com/detagger/

Mornington Crescent
 

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:17:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:
Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

--
/__
\_|\/
/\

Mornington Crescent
 

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:54:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
Andy Macklin might well have written:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:34:25 +0100, NJT wrote:


I thought it was last seen under Nyk's sofa?

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

How about using a rule book, I think I've got one somewhere...

Is that the one with the brick-red cover?

--
/__
\_|\/
/\

Mornington Crescent
 

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:41:43 +0100, NJT wrote:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:17:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:
Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.

Mornington Crescent
 

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:42:10 +0100, NJT wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:54:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
Andy Macklin might well have written:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:34:25 +0100, NJT wrote:


I thought it was last seen under Nyk's sofa?

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

How about using a rule book, I think I've got one somewhere...

Is that the one with the brick-red cover?

Yellow brick I think (sorry I'm puce-yellow colour blind)

Mornington Crescent
 

NJT wrote:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:17:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:
Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

Come to think of it I think that may be how the whole Dollis Hill
fiasco got started :-(

--
HTML-to-text and markup removal with Detagger
http://www.jafsoft.com/detagger/

Mornington Crescent
 

Andy Macklin wrote:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:41:43 +0100, NJT wrote:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:17:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:
Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.

It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)

--
HTML-to-text and markup removal with Detagger
http://www.jafsoft.com/detagger/

Mornington Crescent
 

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:38:39 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
Andy Macklin might well have written:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:42:10 +0100, NJT wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:54:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
Andy Macklin might well have written:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:34:25 +0100, NJT wrote:


I thought it was last seen under Nyk's sofa?

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

How about using a rule book, I think I've got one somewhere...

Is that the one with the brick-red cover?

Yellow brick I think (sorry I'm puce-yellow colour blind)

That'll be the one then.

--
/__
\_|\/
/\

Mornington Crescent
 

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:54:46 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:
Andy Macklin wrote:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:41:43 +0100, NJT wrote:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:17:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:
Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.

It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)


Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.

--
/__
\_|\/
/\

Mornington Crescent
 

NJT wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:54:46 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:

Andy Macklin wrote:


On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:41:43 +0100, NJT wrote:


On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:17:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:

Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.

It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.

No, *that's* the WonderBra

Stuart

Mornington Crescent
 

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.

It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)


Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.

No, *that's* the WonderBra

I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?

--
HTML-to-text and markup removal with Detagger
http://www.jafsoft.com/detagger/

Mornington Crescent
 

John A Fotheringham wrote:
Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.

It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra


I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?

No, that's squirrel sh*t

Mornington Crescent
 

John A Fotheringham wrote:
Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.

It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra


I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?

Aren't we going off-topic here?

Mornington Crescent
 

Stuart Gray wrote:
John A Fotheringham wrote:

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat


Don't you have a problem with looping?


I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.


It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra



I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?

Aren't we going off-topic here?

No, it's Mornington Crescent with the clothing and chocolate option
--
Bruce Fletcher
Stronsay, Orkney
www.stronsay.co.uk/claremont

Mornington Crescent
 

In article , Bruce
Fletcher writes
Stuart Gray wrote:
John A Fotheringham wrote:

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat


Don't you have a problem with looping?


I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.


It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra



I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?

Aren't we going off-topic here?

No, it's Mornington Crescent with the clothing and chocolate option
Ahh - how about Angel whip?

--
John Alexander,

Remove NOSPAM if replying by e-mail

Mornington Crescent
 

John wrote:
In article , Bruce
Fletcher writes

Stuart Gray wrote:

John A Fotheringham wrote:


Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat


Don't you have a problem with looping?


I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.


It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra



I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?


Aren't we going off-topic here?

No, it's Mornington Crescent with the clothing and chocolate option

Ahh - how about Angel whip?


Sorry, religion is forbidden in Mornington Crescent.
--
Bruce Fletcher
Stronsay, Orkney
www.stronsay.co.uk/claremont

Mornington Crescent
 

In article , Bruce
Fletcher writes
John wrote:
In article , Bruce
Fletcher writes

Stuart Gray wrote:

John A Fotheringham wrote:


Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat


Don't you have a problem with looping?


I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.


It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra



I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?


Aren't we going off-topic here?

No, it's Mornington Crescent with the clothing and chocolate option

Ahh - how about Angel whip?


Sorry, religion is forbidden in Mornington Crescent.

Religion? Are you talking Angel or the whip?

--
John Alexander,

Remove NOSPAM if replying by e-mail

Mornington Crescent
 

Bruce Fletcher wrote:
John wrote:
In article ,
Bruce Fletcher writes

Stuart Gray wrote:

John A Fotheringham wrote:


Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes
up the play somewhat


Don't you have a problem with looping?


I've found that this actually causes more problem with
spoon, as well as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.


It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your
tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or
was that the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra



I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?


Aren't we going off-topic here?

No, it's Mornington Crescent with the clothing and chocolate
option

Ahh - how about Angel whip?


Sorry, religion is forbidden in Mornington Crescent.

Come off it, Mornington Crescent *is* a religion.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

Mornington Crescent
 

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:30:40 +0100, John wrote:


(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra



I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?

Aren't we going off-topic here?

No, it's Mornington Crescent with the clothing and chocolate option
Ahh - how about Angel whip?
I'm afraid that's £20 extra

Mornington Crescent
 

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:53:35 +0100, John A Fotheringham
wrote:

NJT wrote:

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:17:19 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
John A Fotheringham might well have written:
Although I do now have a sofa (see archives), I still can't see any
rulebooks under it. Just some fluff.

Will that do?

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Hang on, I'll have a look.

No, sorry, . It's all carpet-coloured. It might work if I used a
contrasting surface...

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

Come to think of it I think that may be how the whole Dollis Hill
fiasco got started :-(

Can you re-arrange the fluff to make some new rules?

Mornington Crescent
 

Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra



I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?


Aren't we going off-topic here?

No, it's Mornington Crescent with the clothing and chocolate option

Ahh - how about Angel whip?


Sorry, religion is forbidden in Mornington Crescent.

Religion? Are you talking Angel or the whip?

Both (but different religions)


--
HTML-to-text and markup removal with Detagger
http://www.jafsoft.com/detagger/

Mornington Crescent
 

SheWolf wrote:

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:29:26 +0100, John A Fotheringham wrote:

Try putting your rules through a Dyson. It really mixes up the
play somewhat

Don't you have a problem with looping?

I've found that this actually causes more problem with spoon, as well
as sometimes leading to a knip in the air.

It does tend to stretch the diagonals and separate your tokens

(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)


Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.

No, *that's* the WonderBra

I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?

Thats a whole other topic

This thread is turning into a bit of a marathon
(no snickering at the back please)

--
HTML-to-text and markup removal with Detagger
http://www.jafsoft.com/detagger/

Mornington Crescent
 

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:08:12 +0100 in alt.games.mornington.cresent,
Andy Macklin might well have written:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:30:40 +0100, John wrote:


(and being a Dyson it *keeps* stretching and separating - or was that
the WonderBra)



Well at least it doesn't beat as it sweeps as it cleans.


No, *that's* the WonderBra



I thought that was a hazelnut in every bite?

Aren't we going off-topic here?

No, it's Mornington Crescent with the clothing and chocolate option
Ahh - how about Angel whip?
I'm afraid that's £20 extra

phone number?

--
/__
\_|\/
/\