![]() |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
A few weeks ago, I got an eMail from the London 2012 bid team saying
that a free event would be taking place on the 6th Jly to mark the announcemnt of who would be holding the games. It said to look on the Ldn 2012 site, though I cant seem to find anything. Anyone know the times & location? |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In message .com, Joe
writes A few weeks ago, I got an eMail from the London 2012 bid team saying that a free event would be taking place on the 6th Jly to mark the announcemnt of who would be holding the games. It said to look on the Ldn 2012 site, though I cant seem to find anything. Anyone know the times & location? http://www.london2012.com/en/news/pr...6-15-08-00.htm -- Paul Terry |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
"Paul Terry" wrote in message ... In message .com, Joe writes A few weeks ago, I got an eMail from the London 2012 bid team saying that a free event would be taking place on the 6th Jly to mark the announcemnt of who would be holding the games. It said to look on the Ldn 2012 site, though I cant seem to find anything. Anyone know the times & location? Cancelled due to a lack of interest |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In message , Paul Terry
writes In message .com, Joe writes A few weeks ago, I got an eMail from the London 2012 bid team saying that a free event would be taking place on the 6th Jly to mark the announcemnt of who would be holding the games. It said to look on the Ldn 2012 site, though I cant seem to find anything. Anyone know the times & location? http://www.london2012.com/en/news/pr.../june/2005-06- 15-08-00.htm I was in Trafalgar Square this afternoon. They're building a stage or something for the event. It'll be a bit of a damp squib should the decision go to Paris. -- congokid Good restaurants in London? Number one on Google http://congokid.com |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In message , congokid
writes I was in Trafalgar Square this afternoon. They're building a stage or something for the event. It'll be a bit of a damp squib should the decision go to Paris. I very much hope that it will - they are much better able to fund the likely multi-billion pound debt (I see that Toronto are still paying off the interest nearly 30 years later, while Greece is saddled with a chain of unused facilities that nobody wants and is trying to justify breaking EU monetary rules by claiming that Athens was virtually bankrupted by the last Olympics). -- Paul Terry |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
"Paul Terry" wrote in message ... In message , congokid writes I was in Trafalgar Square this afternoon. They're building a stage or something for the event. It'll be a bit of a damp squib should the decision go to Paris. I very much hope that it will - they are much better able to fund the likely multi-billion pound debt (I see that Toronto are still paying off the interest nearly 30 years later, while Greece is saddled with a chain of unused facilities that nobody wants and is trying to justify breaking EU monetary rules by claiming that Athens was virtually bankrupted by the last Olympics). -- Paul Terry I think you mean Montreal - '76 games. I think London will have some problems in coping, particularly with transport. Regards David Bennetts Australia |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
David Bennetts wrote: "Paul Terry" wrote in message ... In message , congokid writes I was in Trafalgar Square this afternoon. They're building a stage or something for the event. It'll be a bit of a damp squib should the decision go to Paris. I very much hope that it will - they are much better able to fund the likely multi-billion pound debt (I see that Toronto are still paying off the interest nearly 30 years later, while Greece is saddled with a chain of unused facilities that nobody wants and is trying to justify breaking EU monetary rules by claiming that Athens was virtually bankrupted by the last Olympics). -- Paul Terry I think you mean Montreal - '76 games. I think London will have some problems in coping, particularly with transport. Regards David Bennetts Australia I notice that Ken Livingstone, who is so anti air travel, is in Singapore at the moment. No chance that he could have done his bit by video link then. Kevin |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
David Bennetts wrote:
"Paul Terry" wrote in message ... In message , congokid writes I was in Trafalgar Square this afternoon. They're building a stage or something for the event. It'll be a bit of a damp squib should the decision go to Paris. I very much hope that it will - they are much better able to fund the likely multi-billion pound debt (I see that Toronto are still paying off the interest nearly 30 years later, while Greece is saddled with a chain of unused facilities that nobody wants and is trying to justify breaking EU monetary rules by claiming that Athens was virtually bankrupted by the last Olympics). -- Paul Terry I think you mean Montreal - '76 games. I think London will have some problems in coping, particularly with transport. Regards David Bennetts Australia I'm all in favour of the Olympics coming to London, and I very much hope that the London bid does win - but we'll know what is to be on wednesday. Regarding the announcement from Singapore - it is estimated that the announcement will be around 12.50pm UK time, and as the press release says, there's an event at Trafalgar Square where large television screens will show the result, as well as a similar event in Meridian Square in Stratford, also with a large screen. BBC London radio will be broadcasting live from Singapore, Stratford and Trafalgar Square (on 94.9 FM). I don't have an infinite amount of time to debate the pros & cons of hosting the Olympics (fortunately!), but I will make three quick points... (1) Transport - Stratford will be served by a dedicated "Olympic Javelin" train from St. Pancras, which will take 7 minutes to reach Stratford via the CTRL tunnels. The transport package, which was originally seen by the IOC as a weakness, is now increasingly said to be seen as a strength. See: http://www.london2012.com/en/bid/bes...mes+transport/ (2) The Montreal/Athens debt legacies - New IOC rules now demand that cities bidding for the games have a far more detailed budget and financial plans in place in an attempt to avoid previous problems of overspending. (3) The facilities and their legacy - London (and much of the UK) has pretty poor sporting facilities (compared to equivalent countries) for top tier athletes. There are detailed plans for what will happen to all the facilities after the Games are over, and I'm certain that they will not suffer from a lack of usage as has occurred on other cities. The legacy of the sporting facilities is a real plus point (IMHO of course!) of hosting the games. See: http://www.london2012.com/en/bid/reg...meforsport.htm |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying
: I notice that Ken Livingstone, who is so anti air travel, is in Singapore at the moment. No chance that he could have done his bit by video link then. Ah, but that's different, because he's "one of them" not "one of us". He's Important, so the same rules don't apply. |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
|
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
Adrian wrote: ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : I notice that Ken Livingstone, who is so anti air travel, is in Singapore at the moment. No chance that he could have done his bit by video link then. Ah, but that's different, because he's "one of them" not "one of us". He's Important, so the same rules don't apply. Yes amazing, our journies aren't important but give a politician a chance to go on a jolly and they can never say "well actually this journey is a waste of resources and contributes unnecesarrily to co2 immisssions". This from the guy who doesn't flush his toilet after a ****. I'd hate to have the job of cleaning his wc pan. Kevin |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 18:50:19 +0200, "Skokkie"
wrote: Cancelled due to a lack of interest Utter ******** mate. It's all going ahead. There's hardly anyone against this bid, we're all up for it, apart from a few smelly salmon-smokers in E15. |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 20:31:43 +0100, Paul Terry
wrote: In message , congokid writes I was in Trafalgar Square this afternoon. They're building a stage or something for the event. It'll be a bit of a damp squib should the decision go to Paris. I very much hope that it will - they are much better able to fund the likely multi-billion pound debt (I see that Toronto are still paying off the interest nearly 30 years later, Do you mean Montreal? That was the last Games to lose money. A lot of things have changed since then. while Greece is saddled with a chain of unused facilities that nobody wants Hence the "no white elephants" policy. There's a reason why the bid team has been banging on about the legacy aspect. We'll know soon enough... -- James Farrar September's coming soon |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In article ,
Tristán White wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 18:50:19 +0200, "Skokkie" wrote: Cancelled due to a lack of interest Utter ******** mate. It's all going ahead. There's hardly anyone against this bid, we're all up for it, apart from a few smelly salmon-smokers in E15. What *did* you do at Glastonbury, Tris ?? Nick -- http://www.leverton.org/ ... So express yourself |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In message , James Farrar
writes Do you mean Montreal? Yes I did, sorry! That was the last Games to lose money. Eh? Even Sydney ended up with "a debt that will take a decade to pay off and unused facilities that require millions of dollars in public subsidies every year". The Athens Olympics were initially estimated to cost $1.3 billion. When the detailed planning was finished, the cost to $5.3 billion. After the games were over, Greece found it had actually spent some $14.2 billion and had seriously damaged its economy in the process. while Greece is saddled with a chain of unused facilities that nobody wants Hence the "no white elephants" policy. That's what they said about the dome :( We'll know soon enough... Yes, I'm keeping my fingers crossed. -- Paul Terry |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In message , David Bennetts
writes I think London will have some problems in coping, particularly with transport. I genuinely don't believe that to be the case. (Although I suspect that *any* of the cities up for it *could* stage the games.) -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 12:52:43 +0100, Paul Terry
wrote: In message , James Farrar writes Hence the "no white elephants" policy. That's what they said about the dome :( Irrelevant comparison. The Dome had two possible purposes, between which the government compromised, leading to something pointless. The purpose of sporting facilities is self-defined. -- James Farrar September's coming soon |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In message , James Farrar
writes The Dome had two possible purposes, between which the government compromised, leading to something pointless. The purpose of sporting facilities is self-defined. As in "Pickett's Lock" ? Anyway, I see London have won the bid - I'm sure it'll all be fun in 2012, but I am sure the cost (especially to Londoners) will be enormous and, unlike Pickett's Lock, we won't have the option of pulling-out when it all becomes too expensive. -- Paul Terry |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
"Stuart" wrote in message . uk... wrote: I notice that Ken Livingstone, who is so anti air travel, is in Singapore at the moment. No chance that he could have done his bit by video link then. What a video screen on wheels moving robotically around the Raffles conference centre talking to people? Surely he's only anti cheap or un-necessary air travel Yes, encouraging air travel to the UK for the Olympics |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In message , James Farrar
writes The Dome had two possible purposes, between which the government compromised, leading to something pointless. The purpose of sporting facilities is self-defined. The purpose of sporting facilities is defined primarily in terms of value for money, and that includes demand and longevity. The 28 days of the Olympics is a mere (if brilliant) flash in the pan. I certainly agree that the London bid has given more thought to long term use than those Olympics that have resulted in concrete monstrosities that saw little or no use after the games ended. However, is the public demand to see cyclists going round in circles so overwhelming that we really need a permanent velodrome in the Lea Valley that will accommodate thousands of spectators? Will venues such as Horse Guard's Parade or Hyde Park really be re-dedicated to improving the sporting prowess of our young? If the Dome is so good for indoor sport, why is it not already being used for that purpose? Whatever happened to our "National Sports Centre" at Crystal Palace? As a former teacher (one who taught sport in earlier days) I would rather see the money being used to restore all of the swimming pools, ice rinks and school sports facilities that have been lost or sold off in London over the last 30 years, than being expended on a publicity stunt that will be as short-lived as a glorious firework display. -- Paul Terry |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:48:50 +0100, Paul Terry
wrote: I certainly agree that the London bid has given more thought to long term use than those Olympics that have resulted in concrete monstrosities that saw little or no use after the games ended. Possibly from the Manchester example. The City of Manchester stadium, for one, is now used for football and live music, while the Manchester Aquatics Centre (which I tended to "lovingly" know as Oxford Road Baths) still seems very much in use, though admittedly it is looking a bit tatty now with a number of boarded windows. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:52:51 +0100, Paul Terry
wrote: In message , James Farrar writes The Dome had two possible purposes, between which the government compromised, leading to something pointless. The purpose of sporting facilities is self-defined. As in "Pickett's Lock" ? Pickett's Lock fell victim to the wrangling over athletics at Wembley... -- James Farrar September's coming soon |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
Paul Terry wrote to uk.transport.london on Wed, 6 Jul 2005:
If the Dome is so good for indoor sport, why is it not already being used for that purpose? It's going to be; they are hoping for a permanent ice rink there, and to host the 2008 World Championships. Whatever happened to our "National Sports Centre" at Crystal Palace? It's still there, but badly in need of refurbishment/replacement. As a former teacher (one who taught sport in earlier days) I would rather see the money being used to restore all of the swimming pools, ice rinks and school sports facilities that have been lost or sold off in London over the last 30 years, than being expended on a publicity stunt that will be as short-lived as a glorious firework display. Only one ice rink, as far as I know - and the sooner they bring that back, the better. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 May 2005 |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
In message , Mrs Redboots
writes Only one ice rink, as far as I know - and the sooner they bring that back, the better. Not much chance of Richmond being brought back, I would have thought - I've lived here most of my life and seen endless plans to have the rink rebuilt, but none have come to anything. But I'm sure other rinks have closed. Weren't there rinks at Haringey, Alexandra Palace, and Wembley - and (some time ago) Golder's Green? And I'm sure there was one somewhere in SE London where I went as a schoolboy ... Lewisham or Catford, perhaps - I don't thinkl we went as far as Streatham. -- Paul Terry |
Olympic Announcement 'Event'
Paul Terry wrote to uk.transport.london on Thu, 7 Jul 2005:
In message , Mrs Redboots writes Only one ice rink, as far as I know - and the sooner they bring that back, the better. Not much chance of Richmond being brought back, I would have thought - I've lived here most of my life and seen endless plans to have the rink rebuilt, but none have come to anything. Doesn't stop people still campaigning! But I'm sure other rinks have closed. Weren't there rinks at Haringey, Alexandra Palace, and Wembley - and (some time ago) Golder's Green? And I'm sure there was one somewhere in SE London where I went as a schoolboy ... Lewisham or Catford, perhaps - I don't thinkl we went as far as Streatham. There still is a rink at Alexandra Palace - I was skating there just last night. Don't know about the other rinks, though, not heard of them. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 May 2005 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk