wrote in message
oups.com...
I got home on Thursday just as the press conference started. I was not
impressed by Tom Otoole's performance especially when answering the
question about reporting the incindent first as a power surge and the
as a derailment.


Option 1. People were confused
option 2. 'power surge' keep the situation under control and people will
remain claim - I guess when the bus exploded that was the end of the 'power
surge' story

In article , dave F
writes
Why "must"? It's a hypothesis, but that's all. He could equally have
walked along the platform and out through the Thameslink station. If,
indeed, he planted the bomb there.
Hmm? sorry I don't think so. How can you fit the Thameslink station within
the bomb planting operation?

If, indeed, he planted the bomb at KXSP Piccadilly Line platform, he
could have then exited via the Thameslink station connecting tunnel.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:09:37 +0000 (UTC), "dave F"
wrote:

Option 1. People were confused

Probably that one. The LUL control room reported things as blown
fuses, which would tend to be caused by power surges.

The bus, as others have posted, was a bit of a giveaway...

Neil

--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK
When replying please use neil at the above domain
'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read.

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:48:06 -0500, Ed Lake wrote:

What kind of area is King's Cross?

What kinds have you got?
--
http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9767282.html
(The interesting chimneys suggest Eastleigh station will be warm! 1985)