![]() |
More bombs??
In ,
Bob Wood typed: Now picked up by the BBC site: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4703777.stm This is being constantly updated - and is now reporting "detonators only" LT are reporting "Code Amber". All trains being stopped at platforms and evacuated to ground level. -- Bob |
More bombs??
Bob Wood wrote:
LT are reporting "Code Amber". All trains being stopped at platforms and evacuated to ground level. Just out of interest, how exactly does this work? I can't help feeling that there are usually more trains on the system than there are stations, and that therefore some trains get stopped between stations. Do they detrain people in the tunnel and get them to walk along to a station? Or do they hold trains in the tunnel until the train ahead has been emptied and shunted forward? -- Pat Ricroft, City of Salford, UK ================================ |
More bombs??
"Pat Ricroft" wrote in message oups.com... Bob Wood wrote: LT are reporting "Code Amber". All trains being stopped at platforms and evacuated to ground level. Just out of interest, how exactly does this work? I can't help feeling that there are usually more trains on the system than there are stations, and that therefore some trains get stopped between stations. Do they detrain people in the tunnel and get them to walk along to a station? Or do they hold trains in the tunnel until the train ahead has been emptied and shunted forward? If there is a case of more than one train between stations, the first pulls in, unloads and then pulls forward, either by one car, or fully out of the platform, enabling the second one to trip past the signals and into the platform. |
More bombs??
In oups.com,
Pat Ricroft typed: Bob Wood wrote: LT are reporting "Code Amber". All trains being stopped at platforms and evacuated to ground level. Just out of interest, how exactly does this work? I can't help feeling that there are usually more trains on the system than there are stations, and that therefore some trains get stopped between stations. Do they detrain people in the tunnel and get them to walk along to a station? Or do they hold trains in the tunnel until the train ahead has been emptied and shunted forward? I don't know exactly how it works, but I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. I am sure that some body will be along in due course to give us the exact numbers. I doubt if there would very often be two trains before a pair of stations, but it's not difficult to imagine that at times there could be a train in a station when the order to evacuate was given and another one already have left the station behind. The choice would then be to move the first one into the tunnel to let the next one arrive - or to evacuate into the tunnel through end doors (but this couldn't happen while the power is still on - or to pull the second train up to the back of the first train and to evacuate through the front end door of the second train into the rear end door of the first train and then through that car to the platform. -- Bob |
More bombs??
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:38:16 GMT someone who may be "Bob Wood"
wrote this:- I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. No exact numbers from me. However, I suspect that on certain lines at certain times there are more trains than stations in the central area (a term I use in a vague way). That may also be the case outwith the central area, where the distance between stations is much greater. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000. |
More bombs??
In message , Bob Wood
writes I don't know exactly how it works, but I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. I feel sure that the Waterloo and City has more trains than stations (and probably rather different procedures for evacuation than other lines). -- Paul Terry |
More bombs??
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:09:54 +0100, David Hansen
wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:38:16 GMT someone who may be "Bob Wood" wrote this:- I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. No exact numbers from me. However, I suspect that on certain lines at certain times there are more trains than stations in the central area (a term I use in a vague way). That may also be the case outwith the central area, where the distance between stations is much greater. The Circle Line IME is likely got more trains than stations during the rush hour due to "intruders" from the Met, District and Hammersmith and City although the effect will be lessened to some degree when clearance is required by use of various sidings/extra platforms or escape routes to other lines. The central parts of the Northern Line are possibly another candidate for having more trains than platforms (rather than stations) during the rush hour but I suspect the "excess" trains (if any) do not amount to more than a few. |
More bombs??
"Bob Wood" wrote in message ... In oups.com, Pat Ricroft typed: Bob Wood wrote: LT are reporting "Code Amber". All trains being stopped at platforms and evacuated to ground level. Just out of interest, how exactly does this work? I can't help feeling that there are usually more trains on the system than there are stations, and that therefore some trains get stopped between stations. Do they detrain people in the tunnel and get them to walk along to a station? Or do they hold trains in the tunnel until the train ahead has been emptied and shunted forward? I don't know exactly how it works, but I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. I am sure that some body will be along in due course to give us the exact numbers. On the Victoria line there are 15 stations or 31 platforms and 37 trains during the peaks. Peter Smyth |
More bombs??
"Peter Smyth" wrote in message ... "Bob Wood" wrote in message ... In oups.com, Pat Ricroft typed: Bob Wood wrote: LT are reporting "Code Amber". All trains being stopped at platforms and evacuated to ground level. Just out of interest, how exactly does this work? I can't help feeling that there are usually more trains on the system than there are stations, and that therefore some trains get stopped between stations. Do they detrain people in the tunnel and get them to walk along to a station? Or do they hold trains in the tunnel until the train ahead has been emptied and shunted forward? I don't know exactly how it works, but I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. I am sure that some body will be along in due course to give us the exact numbers. On the Victoria line there are 15 stations or 31 platforms and 37 trains during the peaks. So where are there three platforms (or are you counting one at Northumberland Road?) tim |
More bombs??
On the Victoria line there are 15 stations or 31 platforms and 37 trains
during the peaks. So where are there three platforms (or are you counting one at Northumberland Road?) Seven Sisters? |
More bombs??
Charles Ellson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:09:54 +0100, David Hansen wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:38:16 GMT someone who may be "Bob Wood" wrote this:- I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. No exact numbers from me. However, I suspect that on certain lines at certain times there are more trains than stations in the central area (a term I use in a vague way). That may also be the case outwith the central area, where the distance between stations is much greater. The Circle Line IME is likely got more trains than stations during the rush hour due to "intruders" from the Met, District and Hammersmith and City The Circle Line itself runs only every 8.5 minutes, thus allowing room for the "intruders". The timetabled interval between trains of the combined service is not less than 2 minutes, whereas the stations are generally 1.5 to 2 minutes' running time apart. (Farringdon to King's Cross is the main exception at 3.5 minutes.) So there are, on average anyway, more platforms than trains. although the effect will be lessened to some degree when clearance is required by use of various sidings/extra platforms or escape routes to other lines. The central parts of the Northern Line are possibly another candidate for having more trains than platforms (rather than stations) during the rush hour but I suspect the "excess" trains (if any) do not amount to more than a few. I think that generally in the central area, trains run at 2-minute intervals or more, and stations are 2 minutes apart or less. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
More bombs??
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:51:46 +0100, Paul Terry
wrote: I feel sure that the Waterloo and City has more trains than stations (and probably rather different procedures for evacuation than other lines). Two and two (in service), I thought? Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
More bombs??
In message
Paul Terry wrote: In message , Bob Wood writes I don't know exactly how it works, but I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. I feel sure that the Waterloo and City has more trains than stations (and probably rather different procedures for evacuation than other lines). I thought the W&C had two trains and two stations. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
More bombs??
"tim (moved to sweden)" wrote in message ... "Peter Smyth" wrote On the Victoria line there are 15 stations or 31 platforms and 37 trains during the peaks. So where are there three platforms (or are you counting one at Northumberland Road?) Seven Sisters Peter |
More bombs??
In ,
Paul Terry typed: In message , Bob Wood writes I don't know exactly how it works, but I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. I feel sure that the Waterloo and City has more trains than stations But not more trains than platforms. Of the five trains, four are required to work the peak service; the fifth would be in the depot beyond the platforms at Waterloo. There are two platforms at each of the two termini, so every train could get to a platform. -- Bob |
More bombs??
In ,
Peter Smyth typed: "Bob Wood" wrote in message ... In oups.com, Pat Ricroft typed: Bob Wood wrote: LT are reporting "Code Amber". All trains being stopped at platforms and evacuated to ground level. Just out of interest, how exactly does this work? I can't help feeling that there are usually more trains on the system than there are stations, and that therefore some trains get stopped between stations. Do they detrain people in the tunnel and get them to walk along to a station? Or do they hold trains in the tunnel until the train ahead has been emptied and shunted forward? I don't know exactly how it works, but I think that there are more trains than stations only in your imagination. I am sure that some body will be along in due course to give us the exact numbers. On the Victoria line there are 15 stations or 31 platforms and 37 trains during the peaks. I think there are 16 stations on the Victoria Line - but your point is taken. -- Bob |
More bombs??
"Neil Williams" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:51:46 +0100, Paul Terry wrote: I feel sure that the Waterloo and City has more trains than stations (and probably rather different procedures for evacuation than other lines). Two and two (in service), I thought? IIRC at least in the peaks the W&C has 4 trains in service. Normally all passengers alight from a loaded train each time it enters a platform, and at Waterloo the train runs forward into the headshunt/depot in order to reverse. Presumably after the Code Amber evacuation, on other lines trains run forward ecs to a depot, allowing a following train to enter the same platform to evacuate. Peter |
More bombs??
In message , Graeme Wall
writes I thought the W&C had two trains and two stations. No. Four trains and, for the peak service, six drivers. -- Paul Terry |
More bombs??
In article .com, Pat
Ricroft writes LT are reporting "Code Amber". All trains being stopped at platforms and evacuated to ground level. Just out of interest, how exactly does this work? I can't help feeling that there are usually more trains on the system than there are stations, and that therefore some trains get stopped between stations. The numbers vary. The Victoria Line has a peak of 38 trains for 16 stations and 33 platforms. Overall, the current peak services (pre 7th July) involve: Bakerloo: 32 trains (31 in the evening peak) Central: 72 trains Jubilee: 51 trains (see note) Northern: 91 trains Piccadilly: 76 trains Victoria: 38 trains Waterloo & City: 4 trains Circle + H&C: 30 trains, plus 2 standing spare District: 77 trains (67 D stock, 10 C stock) East London: 6 trains Metropolitan: 45 trains, plus a half train on the Chesham shuttle [In the morning peak, one Jubilee train comes out of service shortly before the last of the 51 enters service.] Do they detrain people in the tunnel and get them to walk along to a station? Or do they hold trains in the tunnel until the train ahead has been emptied and shunted forward? The latter is more common, I believe. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk